Cargando…

Sex differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are sex differences in the cardiorespiratory and sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to central, peripheral, and combined central and peripheral chemoreflex activation. Ten women (29 ± 6 years, 22.8 ± 2.4 kg/m(2): mean ± SD) and 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sayegh, Ana Luiza C., Fan, Jui‐Lin, Vianna, Lauro C., Dawes, Mathew, Paton, Julian F. R., Fisher, James P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35482235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/JP282327
_version_ 1784756901372755968
author Sayegh, Ana Luiza C.
Fan, Jui‐Lin
Vianna, Lauro C.
Dawes, Mathew
Paton, Julian F. R.
Fisher, James P.
author_facet Sayegh, Ana Luiza C.
Fan, Jui‐Lin
Vianna, Lauro C.
Dawes, Mathew
Paton, Julian F. R.
Fisher, James P.
author_sort Sayegh, Ana Luiza C.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are sex differences in the cardiorespiratory and sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to central, peripheral, and combined central and peripheral chemoreflex activation. Ten women (29 ± 6 years, 22.8 ± 2.4 kg/m(2): mean ± SD) and 10 men (30 ± 7 years, 24.8 ± 3.2 kg/m(2)) undertook randomized 5 min breathing trials of: room air (eucapnia), isocapnic hypoxia (10% oxygen (O(2)); peripheral chemoreflex activation), hypercapnic hyperoxia (7% carbon dioxide (CO(2)), 50% O(2); central chemoreflex activation) and hypercapnic hypoxia (7% CO(2), 10% O(2); central and peripheral chemoreflex activation). Control trials of isocapnic hyperoxia (peripheral chemoreflex inhibition) and hypocapnic hyperoxia (central and peripheral chemoreflex inhibition) were also included. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography), mean arterial pressure (MAP; finger photoplethysmography) and minute ventilation ([Formula: see text] (E); pneumotachometer) were measured. Total MSNA (P = 1.000 and P = 0.616), MAP (P = 0.265) and [Formula: see text] (E) (P = 0.587 and P = 0.472) were not different in men and women during eucapnia and during isocapnic hypoxia. Women exhibited attenuated increases in [Formula: see text] (E) during hypercapnic hyperoxia (27.3 ± 6.3 vs. 39.5 ± 7.5 l/min, P < 0.0001) and hypercapnic hypoxia (40.9 ± 9.1 vs. 53.8 ± 13.3 l/min, P < 0.0001) compared with men. However, total MSNA responses were augmented in women (hypercapnic hyperoxia 378 ± 215 vs. 258 ± 107%, P = 0.017; hypercapnic hypoxia 607 ± 290 vs. 362 ± 268%, P < 0.0001). No sex differences in total MSNA, MAP or [Formula: see text] (E) were observed during isocapnic hyperoxia and hypocapnic hyperoxia. Our results indicate that young women have augmented sympathetic responses to central chemoreflex activation, which explains the augmented MSNA response to combined central and peripheral chemoreflex activation. KEY POINTS: Sex differences in the control of breathing have been well studied, but whether there are differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation between healthy women and men is incompletely understood. We observed that, compared with young men, young women displayed augmented increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity during both hypercapnic hyperoxia (central chemoreflex activation) and hypercapnic hypoxia (central and peripheral chemoreflex activation) but had attenuated increases in minute ventilation. In contrast, no sex differences were found in either muscle sympathetic nerve activity or minute ventilation responses to isocapnic hypoxia (peripheral chemoreceptor stimulation). Young women have blunted ventilator, but augmented sympathetic responses, to central (hypercapnic hyperoxia) and combined central and peripheral chemoreflex activation (hypercapnic hypoxia), compared with young men. The possible causative association between the reduced ventilation and heightened sympathetic responses in young women awaits validation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9324851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93248512022-07-30 Sex differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation Sayegh, Ana Luiza C. Fan, Jui‐Lin Vianna, Lauro C. Dawes, Mathew Paton, Julian F. R. Fisher, James P. J Physiol Cardiovascular ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are sex differences in the cardiorespiratory and sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to central, peripheral, and combined central and peripheral chemoreflex activation. Ten women (29 ± 6 years, 22.8 ± 2.4 kg/m(2): mean ± SD) and 10 men (30 ± 7 years, 24.8 ± 3.2 kg/m(2)) undertook randomized 5 min breathing trials of: room air (eucapnia), isocapnic hypoxia (10% oxygen (O(2)); peripheral chemoreflex activation), hypercapnic hyperoxia (7% carbon dioxide (CO(2)), 50% O(2); central chemoreflex activation) and hypercapnic hypoxia (7% CO(2), 10% O(2); central and peripheral chemoreflex activation). Control trials of isocapnic hyperoxia (peripheral chemoreflex inhibition) and hypocapnic hyperoxia (central and peripheral chemoreflex inhibition) were also included. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography), mean arterial pressure (MAP; finger photoplethysmography) and minute ventilation ([Formula: see text] (E); pneumotachometer) were measured. Total MSNA (P = 1.000 and P = 0.616), MAP (P = 0.265) and [Formula: see text] (E) (P = 0.587 and P = 0.472) were not different in men and women during eucapnia and during isocapnic hypoxia. Women exhibited attenuated increases in [Formula: see text] (E) during hypercapnic hyperoxia (27.3 ± 6.3 vs. 39.5 ± 7.5 l/min, P < 0.0001) and hypercapnic hypoxia (40.9 ± 9.1 vs. 53.8 ± 13.3 l/min, P < 0.0001) compared with men. However, total MSNA responses were augmented in women (hypercapnic hyperoxia 378 ± 215 vs. 258 ± 107%, P = 0.017; hypercapnic hypoxia 607 ± 290 vs. 362 ± 268%, P < 0.0001). No sex differences in total MSNA, MAP or [Formula: see text] (E) were observed during isocapnic hyperoxia and hypocapnic hyperoxia. Our results indicate that young women have augmented sympathetic responses to central chemoreflex activation, which explains the augmented MSNA response to combined central and peripheral chemoreflex activation. KEY POINTS: Sex differences in the control of breathing have been well studied, but whether there are differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation between healthy women and men is incompletely understood. We observed that, compared with young men, young women displayed augmented increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity during both hypercapnic hyperoxia (central chemoreflex activation) and hypercapnic hypoxia (central and peripheral chemoreflex activation) but had attenuated increases in minute ventilation. In contrast, no sex differences were found in either muscle sympathetic nerve activity or minute ventilation responses to isocapnic hypoxia (peripheral chemoreceptor stimulation). Young women have blunted ventilator, but augmented sympathetic responses, to central (hypercapnic hyperoxia) and combined central and peripheral chemoreflex activation (hypercapnic hypoxia), compared with young men. The possible causative association between the reduced ventilation and heightened sympathetic responses in young women awaits validation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-12 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9324851/ /pubmed/35482235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/JP282327 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular
Sayegh, Ana Luiza C.
Fan, Jui‐Lin
Vianna, Lauro C.
Dawes, Mathew
Paton, Julian F. R.
Fisher, James P.
Sex differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation
title Sex differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation
title_full Sex differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation
title_fullStr Sex differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation
title_short Sex differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation
title_sort sex differences in the sympathetic neurocirculatory responses to chemoreflex activation
topic Cardiovascular
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35482235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/JP282327
work_keys_str_mv AT sayeghanaluizac sexdifferencesinthesympatheticneurocirculatoryresponsestochemoreflexactivation
AT fanjuilin sexdifferencesinthesympatheticneurocirculatoryresponsestochemoreflexactivation
AT viannalauroc sexdifferencesinthesympatheticneurocirculatoryresponsestochemoreflexactivation
AT dawesmathew sexdifferencesinthesympatheticneurocirculatoryresponsestochemoreflexactivation
AT patonjulianfr sexdifferencesinthesympatheticneurocirculatoryresponsestochemoreflexactivation
AT fisherjamesp sexdifferencesinthesympatheticneurocirculatoryresponsestochemoreflexactivation