Cargando…

Pregnant People's Perspectives On Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Integrative Mixed‐Methods Research Synthesis [Image: see text]

INTRODUCTION: Rates of perinatal cannabis use are rising, despite clinical evidence about the potential for harm. Accordingly, pregnant and lactating people who perceive a benefit from cannabis use may have a difficult time making informed decisions about cannabis use. METHODS: We conducted a system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanstone, Meredith, Panday, Janelle, Popoola, Anuoluwa, Taneja, Shipra, Greyson, Devon, McDonald, Sarah D., Pack, Rachael, Black, Morgan, Murray‐Davis, Beth, Darling, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13363
_version_ 1784756936966668288
author Vanstone, Meredith
Panday, Janelle
Popoola, Anuoluwa
Taneja, Shipra
Greyson, Devon
McDonald, Sarah D.
Pack, Rachael
Black, Morgan
Murray‐Davis, Beth
Darling, Elizabeth
author_facet Vanstone, Meredith
Panday, Janelle
Popoola, Anuoluwa
Taneja, Shipra
Greyson, Devon
McDonald, Sarah D.
Pack, Rachael
Black, Morgan
Murray‐Davis, Beth
Darling, Elizabeth
author_sort Vanstone, Meredith
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rates of perinatal cannabis use are rising, despite clinical evidence about the potential for harm. Accordingly, pregnant and lactating people who perceive a benefit from cannabis use may have a difficult time making informed decisions about cannabis use. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of mixed‐methods research to synthesize existing knowledge on the perspectives of pregnant people and their partners about cannabis use in pregnancy. Six health and social science databases were searched up until May 30, 2021. There were no methodological, time, or geographic limits applied. We employed a convergent integrative approach to the inductive analysis of findings from all studies. RESULTS: We identified 26 studies describing views of 17,781 pregnant and postpartum people about cannabis use in pregnancy. No studies describing the views of partners were identified, and only one study specifically addressed the perspectives of lactating people. Comparative analysis revealed that whether cannabis was studied alone or grouped with other substances resulted in significant diversity in descriptions of participant decision‐making priorities and perceptions of risks and benefits. Studies of cannabis alone demonstrated a complex decision‐making process whereby perceived benefits are balanced against the available information about risk, which is often unclear and uncertain. Clear and helpful information was difficult to identify, and health care providers were not described as a helpful and trusted resource for decision‐making. DISCUSSION: Decision‐making about cannabis use is difficult for pregnant and lactating people who perceive a benefit from this use, although this decisional difficulty is seldom reflected in studies that examine cannabis as one of multiple substances that pregnant or lactating people may use. Our review suggests several approaches clinicians may take to encourage open and supportive conversations to facilitate informed decisions about cannabis use during the perinatal period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9324983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93249832022-07-30 Pregnant People's Perspectives On Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Integrative Mixed‐Methods Research Synthesis [Image: see text] Vanstone, Meredith Panday, Janelle Popoola, Anuoluwa Taneja, Shipra Greyson, Devon McDonald, Sarah D. Pack, Rachael Black, Morgan Murray‐Davis, Beth Darling, Elizabeth J Midwifery Womens Health Reviews INTRODUCTION: Rates of perinatal cannabis use are rising, despite clinical evidence about the potential for harm. Accordingly, pregnant and lactating people who perceive a benefit from cannabis use may have a difficult time making informed decisions about cannabis use. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of mixed‐methods research to synthesize existing knowledge on the perspectives of pregnant people and their partners about cannabis use in pregnancy. Six health and social science databases were searched up until May 30, 2021. There were no methodological, time, or geographic limits applied. We employed a convergent integrative approach to the inductive analysis of findings from all studies. RESULTS: We identified 26 studies describing views of 17,781 pregnant and postpartum people about cannabis use in pregnancy. No studies describing the views of partners were identified, and only one study specifically addressed the perspectives of lactating people. Comparative analysis revealed that whether cannabis was studied alone or grouped with other substances resulted in significant diversity in descriptions of participant decision‐making priorities and perceptions of risks and benefits. Studies of cannabis alone demonstrated a complex decision‐making process whereby perceived benefits are balanced against the available information about risk, which is often unclear and uncertain. Clear and helpful information was difficult to identify, and health care providers were not described as a helpful and trusted resource for decision‐making. DISCUSSION: Decision‐making about cannabis use is difficult for pregnant and lactating people who perceive a benefit from this use, although this decisional difficulty is seldom reflected in studies that examine cannabis as one of multiple substances that pregnant or lactating people may use. Our review suggests several approaches clinicians may take to encourage open and supportive conversations to facilitate informed decisions about cannabis use during the perinatal period. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9324983/ /pubmed/35445514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13363 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Nurse Midwives (ACNM) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Vanstone, Meredith
Panday, Janelle
Popoola, Anuoluwa
Taneja, Shipra
Greyson, Devon
McDonald, Sarah D.
Pack, Rachael
Black, Morgan
Murray‐Davis, Beth
Darling, Elizabeth
Pregnant People's Perspectives On Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Integrative Mixed‐Methods Research Synthesis [Image: see text]
title Pregnant People's Perspectives On Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Integrative Mixed‐Methods Research Synthesis [Image: see text]
title_full Pregnant People's Perspectives On Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Integrative Mixed‐Methods Research Synthesis [Image: see text]
title_fullStr Pregnant People's Perspectives On Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Integrative Mixed‐Methods Research Synthesis [Image: see text]
title_full_unstemmed Pregnant People's Perspectives On Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Integrative Mixed‐Methods Research Synthesis [Image: see text]
title_short Pregnant People's Perspectives On Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Integrative Mixed‐Methods Research Synthesis [Image: see text]
title_sort pregnant people's perspectives on cannabis use during pregnancy: a systematic review and integrative mixed‐methods research synthesis [image: see text]
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9324983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35445514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13363
work_keys_str_mv AT vanstonemeredith pregnantpeoplesperspectivesoncannabisuseduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandintegrativemixedmethodsresearchsynthesisimageseetext
AT pandayjanelle pregnantpeoplesperspectivesoncannabisuseduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandintegrativemixedmethodsresearchsynthesisimageseetext
AT popoolaanuoluwa pregnantpeoplesperspectivesoncannabisuseduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandintegrativemixedmethodsresearchsynthesisimageseetext
AT tanejashipra pregnantpeoplesperspectivesoncannabisuseduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandintegrativemixedmethodsresearchsynthesisimageseetext
AT greysondevon pregnantpeoplesperspectivesoncannabisuseduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandintegrativemixedmethodsresearchsynthesisimageseetext
AT mcdonaldsarahd pregnantpeoplesperspectivesoncannabisuseduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandintegrativemixedmethodsresearchsynthesisimageseetext
AT packrachael pregnantpeoplesperspectivesoncannabisuseduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandintegrativemixedmethodsresearchsynthesisimageseetext
AT blackmorgan pregnantpeoplesperspectivesoncannabisuseduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandintegrativemixedmethodsresearchsynthesisimageseetext
AT murraydavisbeth pregnantpeoplesperspectivesoncannabisuseduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandintegrativemixedmethodsresearchsynthesisimageseetext
AT darlingelizabeth pregnantpeoplesperspectivesoncannabisuseduringpregnancyasystematicreviewandintegrativemixedmethodsresearchsynthesisimageseetext