Cargando…

Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance

AIMS: No consensus exists on the clinical value of tumour regression grading (TRG) systems for therapy effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Existing TRG systems lack standardization and reproducibility, and do not consider the morphological heterogeneity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graham Martinez, Cristina, Kus Öztürk, Sonay, Al‐Kaabi, Ali, Valkema, Maria J, Bokhorst, John‐Melle, Rosman, Camiel, Rütten, Heidi, Wauters, Carla A P, Doukas, Michail, van Lanschot, Joseph Jan‐Baptist, Siersema, Peter D, Nagtegaal, Iris D, van der Post, Rachel Sofia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35352847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14644
_version_ 1784757030872940544
author Graham Martinez, Cristina
Kus Öztürk, Sonay
Al‐Kaabi, Ali
Valkema, Maria J
Bokhorst, John‐Melle
Rosman, Camiel
Rütten, Heidi
Wauters, Carla A P
Doukas, Michail
van Lanschot, Joseph Jan‐Baptist
Siersema, Peter D
Nagtegaal, Iris D
van der Post, Rachel Sofia
author_facet Graham Martinez, Cristina
Kus Öztürk, Sonay
Al‐Kaabi, Ali
Valkema, Maria J
Bokhorst, John‐Melle
Rosman, Camiel
Rütten, Heidi
Wauters, Carla A P
Doukas, Michail
van Lanschot, Joseph Jan‐Baptist
Siersema, Peter D
Nagtegaal, Iris D
van der Post, Rachel Sofia
author_sort Graham Martinez, Cristina
collection PubMed
description AIMS: No consensus exists on the clinical value of tumour regression grading (TRG) systems for therapy effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Existing TRG systems lack standardization and reproducibility, and do not consider the morphological heterogeneity of tumour response. Therefore, we aim to identify morphological tumour regression patterns of oesophageal adenocarcinoma after nCRT and their association with survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma, who underwent nCRT followed by surgery and achieved a partial response to nCRT, were identified from two Dutch upper‐gastrointestinal (GI) centres (2005–18; test cohort). Resection specimens were scored for regression patterns by two independent observers according to a pre‐defined three‐step flowchart. The results were validated in an external cohort (2001–17). In total, 110 patients were included in the test cohort and 115 in the validation cohort. In the test cohort, two major regression patterns were identified: fragmentation (60%) and shrinkage (40%), with an excellent interobserver agreement (κ = 0.87). Here, patients with a fragmented pattern had a significantly higher pathological stage (stages III/IV: 52 versus 16%; P < 0.001), less downstaging (48 versus 91%; P < 0.001), a higher risk of recurrence [risk ratio (RR) = 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5–5.6] and poorer 5‐year overall survival (30 versus 80% respectively, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The validation cohort confirmed these findings, although had more advanced cases (case‐stages = III/IV 91 versus 73%, P = 0.005) and a higher prevalence of fragmented‐pattern cases (80 versus 60%, P = 0.002). When combining the cohorts in multivariate analysis, the pattern of response was an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.0–3.0]. In conclusion, we established an externally validated, reproducible and clinically relevant classification of tumour response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9325353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93253532022-07-30 Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance Graham Martinez, Cristina Kus Öztürk, Sonay Al‐Kaabi, Ali Valkema, Maria J Bokhorst, John‐Melle Rosman, Camiel Rütten, Heidi Wauters, Carla A P Doukas, Michail van Lanschot, Joseph Jan‐Baptist Siersema, Peter D Nagtegaal, Iris D van der Post, Rachel Sofia Histopathology Original Articles AIMS: No consensus exists on the clinical value of tumour regression grading (TRG) systems for therapy effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Existing TRG systems lack standardization and reproducibility, and do not consider the morphological heterogeneity of tumour response. Therefore, we aim to identify morphological tumour regression patterns of oesophageal adenocarcinoma after nCRT and their association with survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma, who underwent nCRT followed by surgery and achieved a partial response to nCRT, were identified from two Dutch upper‐gastrointestinal (GI) centres (2005–18; test cohort). Resection specimens were scored for regression patterns by two independent observers according to a pre‐defined three‐step flowchart. The results were validated in an external cohort (2001–17). In total, 110 patients were included in the test cohort and 115 in the validation cohort. In the test cohort, two major regression patterns were identified: fragmentation (60%) and shrinkage (40%), with an excellent interobserver agreement (κ = 0.87). Here, patients with a fragmented pattern had a significantly higher pathological stage (stages III/IV: 52 versus 16%; P < 0.001), less downstaging (48 versus 91%; P < 0.001), a higher risk of recurrence [risk ratio (RR) = 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5–5.6] and poorer 5‐year overall survival (30 versus 80% respectively, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The validation cohort confirmed these findings, although had more advanced cases (case‐stages = III/IV 91 versus 73%, P = 0.005) and a higher prevalence of fragmented‐pattern cases (80 versus 60%, P = 0.002). When combining the cohorts in multivariate analysis, the pattern of response was an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.0–3.0]. In conclusion, we established an externally validated, reproducible and clinically relevant classification of tumour response. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-06 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9325353/ /pubmed/35352847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14644 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Graham Martinez, Cristina
Kus Öztürk, Sonay
Al‐Kaabi, Ali
Valkema, Maria J
Bokhorst, John‐Melle
Rosman, Camiel
Rütten, Heidi
Wauters, Carla A P
Doukas, Michail
van Lanschot, Joseph Jan‐Baptist
Siersema, Peter D
Nagtegaal, Iris D
van der Post, Rachel Sofia
Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance
title Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance
title_full Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance
title_fullStr Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance
title_full_unstemmed Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance
title_short Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance
title_sort shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35352847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14644
work_keys_str_mv AT grahammartinezcristina shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT kusozturksonay shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT alkaabiali shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT valkemamariaj shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT bokhorstjohnmelle shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT rosmancamiel shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT ruttenheidi shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT wauterscarlaap shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT doukasmichail shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT vanlanschotjosephjanbaptist shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT siersemapeterd shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT nagtegaalirisd shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance
AT vanderpostrachelsofia shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance