Cargando…
Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance
AIMS: No consensus exists on the clinical value of tumour regression grading (TRG) systems for therapy effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Existing TRG systems lack standardization and reproducibility, and do not consider the morphological heterogeneity of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35352847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14644 |
_version_ | 1784757030872940544 |
---|---|
author | Graham Martinez, Cristina Kus Öztürk, Sonay Al‐Kaabi, Ali Valkema, Maria J Bokhorst, John‐Melle Rosman, Camiel Rütten, Heidi Wauters, Carla A P Doukas, Michail van Lanschot, Joseph Jan‐Baptist Siersema, Peter D Nagtegaal, Iris D van der Post, Rachel Sofia |
author_facet | Graham Martinez, Cristina Kus Öztürk, Sonay Al‐Kaabi, Ali Valkema, Maria J Bokhorst, John‐Melle Rosman, Camiel Rütten, Heidi Wauters, Carla A P Doukas, Michail van Lanschot, Joseph Jan‐Baptist Siersema, Peter D Nagtegaal, Iris D van der Post, Rachel Sofia |
author_sort | Graham Martinez, Cristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: No consensus exists on the clinical value of tumour regression grading (TRG) systems for therapy effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Existing TRG systems lack standardization and reproducibility, and do not consider the morphological heterogeneity of tumour response. Therefore, we aim to identify morphological tumour regression patterns of oesophageal adenocarcinoma after nCRT and their association with survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma, who underwent nCRT followed by surgery and achieved a partial response to nCRT, were identified from two Dutch upper‐gastrointestinal (GI) centres (2005–18; test cohort). Resection specimens were scored for regression patterns by two independent observers according to a pre‐defined three‐step flowchart. The results were validated in an external cohort (2001–17). In total, 110 patients were included in the test cohort and 115 in the validation cohort. In the test cohort, two major regression patterns were identified: fragmentation (60%) and shrinkage (40%), with an excellent interobserver agreement (κ = 0.87). Here, patients with a fragmented pattern had a significantly higher pathological stage (stages III/IV: 52 versus 16%; P < 0.001), less downstaging (48 versus 91%; P < 0.001), a higher risk of recurrence [risk ratio (RR) = 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5–5.6] and poorer 5‐year overall survival (30 versus 80% respectively, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The validation cohort confirmed these findings, although had more advanced cases (case‐stages = III/IV 91 versus 73%, P = 0.005) and a higher prevalence of fragmented‐pattern cases (80 versus 60%, P = 0.002). When combining the cohorts in multivariate analysis, the pattern of response was an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.0–3.0]. In conclusion, we established an externally validated, reproducible and clinically relevant classification of tumour response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9325353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93253532022-07-30 Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance Graham Martinez, Cristina Kus Öztürk, Sonay Al‐Kaabi, Ali Valkema, Maria J Bokhorst, John‐Melle Rosman, Camiel Rütten, Heidi Wauters, Carla A P Doukas, Michail van Lanschot, Joseph Jan‐Baptist Siersema, Peter D Nagtegaal, Iris D van der Post, Rachel Sofia Histopathology Original Articles AIMS: No consensus exists on the clinical value of tumour regression grading (TRG) systems for therapy effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Existing TRG systems lack standardization and reproducibility, and do not consider the morphological heterogeneity of tumour response. Therefore, we aim to identify morphological tumour regression patterns of oesophageal adenocarcinoma after nCRT and their association with survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma, who underwent nCRT followed by surgery and achieved a partial response to nCRT, were identified from two Dutch upper‐gastrointestinal (GI) centres (2005–18; test cohort). Resection specimens were scored for regression patterns by two independent observers according to a pre‐defined three‐step flowchart. The results were validated in an external cohort (2001–17). In total, 110 patients were included in the test cohort and 115 in the validation cohort. In the test cohort, two major regression patterns were identified: fragmentation (60%) and shrinkage (40%), with an excellent interobserver agreement (κ = 0.87). Here, patients with a fragmented pattern had a significantly higher pathological stage (stages III/IV: 52 versus 16%; P < 0.001), less downstaging (48 versus 91%; P < 0.001), a higher risk of recurrence [risk ratio (RR) = 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5–5.6] and poorer 5‐year overall survival (30 versus 80% respectively, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The validation cohort confirmed these findings, although had more advanced cases (case‐stages = III/IV 91 versus 73%, P = 0.005) and a higher prevalence of fragmented‐pattern cases (80 versus 60%, P = 0.002). When combining the cohorts in multivariate analysis, the pattern of response was an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.0–3.0]. In conclusion, we established an externally validated, reproducible and clinically relevant classification of tumour response. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-06 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9325353/ /pubmed/35352847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14644 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Graham Martinez, Cristina Kus Öztürk, Sonay Al‐Kaabi, Ali Valkema, Maria J Bokhorst, John‐Melle Rosman, Camiel Rütten, Heidi Wauters, Carla A P Doukas, Michail van Lanschot, Joseph Jan‐Baptist Siersema, Peter D Nagtegaal, Iris D van der Post, Rachel Sofia Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance |
title | Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance |
title_full | Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance |
title_fullStr | Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance |
title_full_unstemmed | Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance |
title_short | Shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance |
title_sort | shrinkage versus fragmentation response in neoadjuvantly treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma: significant prognostic relevance |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35352847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14644 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grahammartinezcristina shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT kusozturksonay shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT alkaabiali shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT valkemamariaj shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT bokhorstjohnmelle shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT rosmancamiel shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT ruttenheidi shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT wauterscarlaap shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT doukasmichail shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT vanlanschotjosephjanbaptist shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT siersemapeterd shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT nagtegaalirisd shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance AT vanderpostrachelsofia shrinkageversusfragmentationresponseinneoadjuvantlytreatedoesophagealadenocarcinomasignificantprognosticrelevance |