Cargando…
Evaluating the clinical utility of the patient‐identified most bothersome symptom measure from PROMISE‐2 for research in migraine prevention
OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the novel patient‐identified (PI) most bothersome symptom (MBS) measure from PROMISE‐2, a phase 3 trial of eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. BACKGROUND: Relief of bothersome migraine symptoms can influence satisfaction with treatment an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35466430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.14295 |
_version_ | 1784757031377305600 |
---|---|
author | Lipton, Richard B. Goadsby, Peter J. Dodick, David W. McGinley, James S. Houts, Carrie R. Wirth, R. J. Kymes, Steve Ettrup, Anders Østerberg, Ole Cady, Roger Ashina, Messoud Buse, Dawn C. |
author_facet | Lipton, Richard B. Goadsby, Peter J. Dodick, David W. McGinley, James S. Houts, Carrie R. Wirth, R. J. Kymes, Steve Ettrup, Anders Østerberg, Ole Cady, Roger Ashina, Messoud Buse, Dawn C. |
author_sort | Lipton, Richard B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the novel patient‐identified (PI) most bothersome symptom (MBS) measure from PROMISE‐2, a phase 3 trial of eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. BACKGROUND: Relief of bothersome migraine symptoms can influence satisfaction with treatment and therapeutic persistence. Understanding the impact of preventive treatment on a PI‐MBS could improve clinical decision‐making. METHODS: In PROMISE‐2, patients with chronic migraine received eptinezumab 100, 300 mg, or placebo administered intravenously every 12 weeks for up to 2 doses (n = 1072). PI‐MBS was an exploratory outcome requiring each patient to self‐report their MBS in response to an open‐ended question. At baseline and week 12, patients rated overall improvement in PI‐MBS. The relationships among PI‐MBS at week 12 and change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) from baseline to month 3 (weeks 9–12), Patient Global Impression of Change at week 12, and changes from baseline to week 12 in the 6‐item Headache Impact Test total, EuroQol 5‐dimensions 5‐levels visual analog scale, and 36‐item Short‐Form Health Survey component scores were assessed. RESULTS: Treatment groups had similar baseline characteristics and reported a total of 23 unique PI‐MBS, most commonly light sensitivity (200/1072, 18.7%), nausea/vomiting (162/1072, 15.1%), and pain with activity (147/1072, 13.7%). Improvements in PI‐MBS at week 12 correlated with changes in MMDs (ρ = −0.49; p < 0.0001) and other patient‐reported outcomes. Controlling for changes in MMDs, PI‐MBS improvement predicted other patient‐reported outcomes in expected directions. The magnitude of the standardized mean differences between placebo and active treatment for PI‐MBS were 0.31 (p < 0.0001 vs. placebo) and 0.54 (p < 0.0001 vs. placebo) for eptinezumab 100 and 300 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in PI‐MBS at week 12 was associated with improvement in other patient‐reported outcome measures, and PI‐MBS may be an important patient‐centered measure of treatment benefits in patients with chronic migraine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9325355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93253552022-07-30 Evaluating the clinical utility of the patient‐identified most bothersome symptom measure from PROMISE‐2 for research in migraine prevention Lipton, Richard B. Goadsby, Peter J. Dodick, David W. McGinley, James S. Houts, Carrie R. Wirth, R. J. Kymes, Steve Ettrup, Anders Østerberg, Ole Cady, Roger Ashina, Messoud Buse, Dawn C. Headache Research Submissions OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the novel patient‐identified (PI) most bothersome symptom (MBS) measure from PROMISE‐2, a phase 3 trial of eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. BACKGROUND: Relief of bothersome migraine symptoms can influence satisfaction with treatment and therapeutic persistence. Understanding the impact of preventive treatment on a PI‐MBS could improve clinical decision‐making. METHODS: In PROMISE‐2, patients with chronic migraine received eptinezumab 100, 300 mg, or placebo administered intravenously every 12 weeks for up to 2 doses (n = 1072). PI‐MBS was an exploratory outcome requiring each patient to self‐report their MBS in response to an open‐ended question. At baseline and week 12, patients rated overall improvement in PI‐MBS. The relationships among PI‐MBS at week 12 and change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) from baseline to month 3 (weeks 9–12), Patient Global Impression of Change at week 12, and changes from baseline to week 12 in the 6‐item Headache Impact Test total, EuroQol 5‐dimensions 5‐levels visual analog scale, and 36‐item Short‐Form Health Survey component scores were assessed. RESULTS: Treatment groups had similar baseline characteristics and reported a total of 23 unique PI‐MBS, most commonly light sensitivity (200/1072, 18.7%), nausea/vomiting (162/1072, 15.1%), and pain with activity (147/1072, 13.7%). Improvements in PI‐MBS at week 12 correlated with changes in MMDs (ρ = −0.49; p < 0.0001) and other patient‐reported outcomes. Controlling for changes in MMDs, PI‐MBS improvement predicted other patient‐reported outcomes in expected directions. The magnitude of the standardized mean differences between placebo and active treatment for PI‐MBS were 0.31 (p < 0.0001 vs. placebo) and 0.54 (p < 0.0001 vs. placebo) for eptinezumab 100 and 300 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in PI‐MBS at week 12 was associated with improvement in other patient‐reported outcome measures, and PI‐MBS may be an important patient‐centered measure of treatment benefits in patients with chronic migraine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-25 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9325355/ /pubmed/35466430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.14295 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Submissions Lipton, Richard B. Goadsby, Peter J. Dodick, David W. McGinley, James S. Houts, Carrie R. Wirth, R. J. Kymes, Steve Ettrup, Anders Østerberg, Ole Cady, Roger Ashina, Messoud Buse, Dawn C. Evaluating the clinical utility of the patient‐identified most bothersome symptom measure from PROMISE‐2 for research in migraine prevention |
title | Evaluating the clinical utility of the patient‐identified most bothersome symptom measure from PROMISE‐2 for research in migraine prevention |
title_full | Evaluating the clinical utility of the patient‐identified most bothersome symptom measure from PROMISE‐2 for research in migraine prevention |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the clinical utility of the patient‐identified most bothersome symptom measure from PROMISE‐2 for research in migraine prevention |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the clinical utility of the patient‐identified most bothersome symptom measure from PROMISE‐2 for research in migraine prevention |
title_short | Evaluating the clinical utility of the patient‐identified most bothersome symptom measure from PROMISE‐2 for research in migraine prevention |
title_sort | evaluating the clinical utility of the patient‐identified most bothersome symptom measure from promise‐2 for research in migraine prevention |
topic | Research Submissions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35466430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.14295 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liptonrichardb evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT goadsbypeterj evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT dodickdavidw evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT mcginleyjamess evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT houtscarrier evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT wirthrj evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT kymessteve evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT ettrupanders evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT østerbergole evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT cadyroger evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT ashinamessoud evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention AT busedawnc evaluatingtheclinicalutilityofthepatientidentifiedmostbothersomesymptommeasurefrompromise2forresearchinmigraineprevention |