Cargando…

Polyethylene–Water and Polydimethylsiloxane–Water Partition Coefficients for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Influence of Polymer Source and Proposed Best Available Values

For most passive sampling applications, the availability of accurate passive sampler–water partition coefficients (K (p‐w)) is of key importance. Unfortunately, a huge variability exists in literature K (p‐w) values, in particular for hydrophobic chemicals such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jonker, Michiel T. O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35322897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5333
_version_ 1784757033088581632
author Jonker, Michiel T. O.
author_facet Jonker, Michiel T. O.
author_sort Jonker, Michiel T. O.
collection PubMed
description For most passive sampling applications, the availability of accurate passive sampler–water partition coefficients (K (p‐w)) is of key importance. Unfortunately, a huge variability exists in literature K (p‐w) values, in particular for hydrophobic chemicals such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). This variability is a major source of concern in the passive sampling community, which would benefit from high‐quality K (p‐w) data. Hence, in the present study “best available” PAH and PCB K (p‐w) values are proposed for the two most often applied passive sampling materials, that is, low‐density polyethylene and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), based on (1) a critical assessment of existing literature data, and (2) new K (p‐w) determinations for polyethylene and PDMS, with both polymers coming in six different versions (suppliers, thicknesses). The experimental results indicated that K (p‐w) values for PDMS are independent of the source, thus allowing straightforward standardization. In contrast, K (p‐w) values for polyethylene from different sources differed by up to 30%. Defining best available K (p‐w) values for this polymer therefore may require standardization of the polymer source. Application of the proposed best available K (p‐w) values will substantially improve the accuracy of freely dissolved concentration results by users and the potential for comparisons across laboratories. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:1370–1380. © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9325362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93253622022-07-30 Polyethylene–Water and Polydimethylsiloxane–Water Partition Coefficients for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Influence of Polymer Source and Proposed Best Available Values Jonker, Michiel T. O. Environ Toxicol Chem Environmental Chemistry For most passive sampling applications, the availability of accurate passive sampler–water partition coefficients (K (p‐w)) is of key importance. Unfortunately, a huge variability exists in literature K (p‐w) values, in particular for hydrophobic chemicals such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). This variability is a major source of concern in the passive sampling community, which would benefit from high‐quality K (p‐w) data. Hence, in the present study “best available” PAH and PCB K (p‐w) values are proposed for the two most often applied passive sampling materials, that is, low‐density polyethylene and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), based on (1) a critical assessment of existing literature data, and (2) new K (p‐w) determinations for polyethylene and PDMS, with both polymers coming in six different versions (suppliers, thicknesses). The experimental results indicated that K (p‐w) values for PDMS are independent of the source, thus allowing straightforward standardization. In contrast, K (p‐w) values for polyethylene from different sources differed by up to 30%. Defining best available K (p‐w) values for this polymer therefore may require standardization of the polymer source. Application of the proposed best available K (p‐w) values will substantially improve the accuracy of freely dissolved concentration results by users and the potential for comparisons across laboratories. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:1370–1380. © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-16 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9325362/ /pubmed/35322897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5333 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Environmental Chemistry
Jonker, Michiel T. O.
Polyethylene–Water and Polydimethylsiloxane–Water Partition Coefficients for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Influence of Polymer Source and Proposed Best Available Values
title Polyethylene–Water and Polydimethylsiloxane–Water Partition Coefficients for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Influence of Polymer Source and Proposed Best Available Values
title_full Polyethylene–Water and Polydimethylsiloxane–Water Partition Coefficients for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Influence of Polymer Source and Proposed Best Available Values
title_fullStr Polyethylene–Water and Polydimethylsiloxane–Water Partition Coefficients for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Influence of Polymer Source and Proposed Best Available Values
title_full_unstemmed Polyethylene–Water and Polydimethylsiloxane–Water Partition Coefficients for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Influence of Polymer Source and Proposed Best Available Values
title_short Polyethylene–Water and Polydimethylsiloxane–Water Partition Coefficients for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated Biphenyls: Influence of Polymer Source and Proposed Best Available Values
title_sort polyethylene–water and polydimethylsiloxane–water partition coefficients for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls: influence of polymer source and proposed best available values
topic Environmental Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35322897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5333
work_keys_str_mv AT jonkermichielto polyethylenewaterandpolydimethylsiloxanewaterpartitioncoefficientsforpolycyclicaromatichydrocarbonsandpolychlorinatedbiphenylsinfluenceofpolymersourceandproposedbestavailablevalues