Cargando…

Soft tissue phenotype modification predicts gingival margin long‐term (10‐year) stability: Longitudinal analysis of six randomized clinical trials

AIM: To assess the prognostic value of soft tissue phenotype modification following root coverage procedures for predicting the long‐term (10‐year) behaviour of the gingival margin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants from six randomized clinical trials on root coverage procedures at the University...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barootchi, Shayan, Tavelli, Lorenzo, Di Gianfilippo, Riccardo, Shedden, Kerby, Oh, Tae‐Ju, Rasperini, Giulio, Neiva, Rodrigo, Giannobile, William V., Wang, Hom‐Lay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35561034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13641
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To assess the prognostic value of soft tissue phenotype modification following root coverage procedures for predicting the long‐term (10‐year) behaviour of the gingival margin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants from six randomized clinical trials on root coverage procedures at the University of Michigan were re‐invited for a longitudinal evaluation. Clinical measurements were obtained by two calibrated examiners. A data‐driven approach to model selection with Akaike information criterion (AIC) was carried out via multilevel regression analyses and partial regression plotting for changes in the level of the gingival margin over time and interactions with the early (6‐month) results of soft tissue phenotypic modification. RESULTS: One‐hundred and fifty‐seven treated sites in 83 patients were re‐assessed at the long‐term recall. AIC‐driven model selection and regression analyses demonstrated that 6‐month keratinized tissue width (KTW) and gingival thickness (GT) influenced the trajectory of the gingival margin similarly in a concave manner; however, GT was the driving determinant that predicted significantly less relapse in the treatments, with stability of the treated gingival margin obtained beyond values of 1.46 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Among a compliant patient cohort, irrespective of the rendered therapy, the presence of at least 1.5 mm KTW and 1.46 mm GT was correlated with the long‐term stability of the gingival margin.