Cargando…

Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review of literature

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial damage occurs in up to 25% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) cases. While veno‐venous extracorporeal life support (V‐V ECLS) is used as respiratory support, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be required for severe cardiac dysfunction. This systematic review summariz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariani, Silvia, De Piero, Maria Elena, Ravaux, Justine M., Saelmans, Alexander, Kawczynski, Michal J., van Bussel, Bas C. T., Di Mauro, Michele, Willers, Anne, Swol, Justyna, Kowalewski, Mariusz, Li, Tong, Delnoij, Thijs S. R., van der Horst, Iwan C. C., Maessen, Jos, Lorusso, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35490367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14261
_version_ 1784757082204930048
author Mariani, Silvia
De Piero, Maria Elena
Ravaux, Justine M.
Saelmans, Alexander
Kawczynski, Michal J.
van Bussel, Bas C. T.
Di Mauro, Michele
Willers, Anne
Swol, Justyna
Kowalewski, Mariusz
Li, Tong
Delnoij, Thijs S. R.
van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
Maessen, Jos
Lorusso, Roberto
author_facet Mariani, Silvia
De Piero, Maria Elena
Ravaux, Justine M.
Saelmans, Alexander
Kawczynski, Michal J.
van Bussel, Bas C. T.
Di Mauro, Michele
Willers, Anne
Swol, Justyna
Kowalewski, Mariusz
Li, Tong
Delnoij, Thijs S. R.
van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
Maessen, Jos
Lorusso, Roberto
author_sort Mariani, Silvia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Myocardial damage occurs in up to 25% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) cases. While veno‐venous extracorporeal life support (V‐V ECLS) is used as respiratory support, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be required for severe cardiac dysfunction. This systematic review summarizes the available literature regarding MCS use rates, disease drivers for MCS initiation, and MCS outcomes in COVID‐19 patients. METHODS: PubMed/EMBASE were searched until October 14, 2021. Articles including adults receiving ECLS for COVID‐19 were included. The primary outcome was the rate of MCS use. Secondary outcomes included mortality at follow‐up, ECLS conversion rate, intubation‐to‐cannulation time, time on ECLS, cardiac diseases, use of inotropes, and vasopressors. RESULTS: Twenty‐eight observational studies (comprising both ECLS‐only populations and ECLS patients as part of larger populations) included 4218 COVID‐19 patients (females: 28.8%; median age: 54.3 years, 95%CI: 50.7–57.8) of whom 2774 (65.8%) required ECLS with the majority (92.7%) on V‐V ECLS, 4.7% on veno‐arterial ECLS and/or Impella, and 2.6% on other ECLS. Acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest were reported in 7.8%, 9.7%, and 6.6% of patients, respectively. Vasopressors were used in 37.2%. Overall, 3.1% of patients required an ECLS change from V‐V ECLS to MCS for heart failure, myocarditis, or myocardial infarction. The median ECLS duration was 15.9 days (95%CI: 13.9–16.3), with an overall survival of 54.6% and 28.1% in V‐V ECLS and MCS patients. One study reported 61.1% survival with oxy‐right ventricular assist device. CONCLUSION: MCS use for cardiocirculatory compromise has been reported in 7.3% of COVID‐19 patients requiring ECLS, which is a lower percentage compared to the incidence of any severe cardiocirculatory complication. Based on the poor survival rates, further investigations are warranted to establish the most appropriated indications and timing for MCS in COVID‐19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9325561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93255612022-07-30 Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review of literature Mariani, Silvia De Piero, Maria Elena Ravaux, Justine M. Saelmans, Alexander Kawczynski, Michal J. van Bussel, Bas C. T. Di Mauro, Michele Willers, Anne Swol, Justyna Kowalewski, Mariusz Li, Tong Delnoij, Thijs S. R. van der Horst, Iwan C. C. Maessen, Jos Lorusso, Roberto Artif Organs Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: Myocardial damage occurs in up to 25% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) cases. While veno‐venous extracorporeal life support (V‐V ECLS) is used as respiratory support, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be required for severe cardiac dysfunction. This systematic review summarizes the available literature regarding MCS use rates, disease drivers for MCS initiation, and MCS outcomes in COVID‐19 patients. METHODS: PubMed/EMBASE were searched until October 14, 2021. Articles including adults receiving ECLS for COVID‐19 were included. The primary outcome was the rate of MCS use. Secondary outcomes included mortality at follow‐up, ECLS conversion rate, intubation‐to‐cannulation time, time on ECLS, cardiac diseases, use of inotropes, and vasopressors. RESULTS: Twenty‐eight observational studies (comprising both ECLS‐only populations and ECLS patients as part of larger populations) included 4218 COVID‐19 patients (females: 28.8%; median age: 54.3 years, 95%CI: 50.7–57.8) of whom 2774 (65.8%) required ECLS with the majority (92.7%) on V‐V ECLS, 4.7% on veno‐arterial ECLS and/or Impella, and 2.6% on other ECLS. Acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest were reported in 7.8%, 9.7%, and 6.6% of patients, respectively. Vasopressors were used in 37.2%. Overall, 3.1% of patients required an ECLS change from V‐V ECLS to MCS for heart failure, myocarditis, or myocardial infarction. The median ECLS duration was 15.9 days (95%CI: 13.9–16.3), with an overall survival of 54.6% and 28.1% in V‐V ECLS and MCS patients. One study reported 61.1% survival with oxy‐right ventricular assist device. CONCLUSION: MCS use for cardiocirculatory compromise has been reported in 7.3% of COVID‐19 patients requiring ECLS, which is a lower percentage compared to the incidence of any severe cardiocirculatory complication. Based on the poor survival rates, further investigations are warranted to establish the most appropriated indications and timing for MCS in COVID‐19. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-01 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9325561/ /pubmed/35490367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14261 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Mariani, Silvia
De Piero, Maria Elena
Ravaux, Justine M.
Saelmans, Alexander
Kawczynski, Michal J.
van Bussel, Bas C. T.
Di Mauro, Michele
Willers, Anne
Swol, Justyna
Kowalewski, Mariusz
Li, Tong
Delnoij, Thijs S. R.
van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
Maessen, Jos
Lorusso, Roberto
Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review of literature
title Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review of literature
title_full Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review of literature
title_fullStr Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review of literature
title_short Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID‐19 patients: A systematic review of literature
title_sort temporary mechanical circulatory support for covid‐19 patients: a systematic review of literature
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35490367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.14261
work_keys_str_mv AT marianisilvia temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT depieromariaelena temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT ravauxjustinem temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT saelmansalexander temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT kawczynskimichalj temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT vanbusselbasct temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT dimauromichele temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT willersanne temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT swoljustyna temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT kowalewskimariusz temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT litong temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT delnoijthijssr temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT vanderhorstiwancc temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT maessenjos temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature
AT lorussoroberto temporarymechanicalcirculatorysupportforcovid19patientsasystematicreviewofliterature