Cargando…

Is the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit Sustainable: A 5-Year Experience of a Beneficial and Novel Model

BACKGROUND: The 6-bed critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU) is a unique and specialized intensive care unit (ICU) that streamlines the interhospital transfer (IHT—transfer between different hospitals) process for a wide range of patients with critical illness or time-sensitive disease. Previous st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell, Elizabeth, Sahadzic, Iana, Najafali, Daniel, Berman, Emilie, Andersen, Katie, Afridi, Leenah Z., Gasparotti, Zoe, Niles, Erin, Rea, Jeffrey, Scalea, Thomas, Haase, Daniel J., Tran, Quincy K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35912041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6171598
_version_ 1784757103848587264
author Powell, Elizabeth
Sahadzic, Iana
Najafali, Daniel
Berman, Emilie
Andersen, Katie
Afridi, Leenah Z.
Gasparotti, Zoe
Niles, Erin
Rea, Jeffrey
Scalea, Thomas
Haase, Daniel J.
Tran, Quincy K.
author_facet Powell, Elizabeth
Sahadzic, Iana
Najafali, Daniel
Berman, Emilie
Andersen, Katie
Afridi, Leenah Z.
Gasparotti, Zoe
Niles, Erin
Rea, Jeffrey
Scalea, Thomas
Haase, Daniel J.
Tran, Quincy K.
author_sort Powell, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 6-bed critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU) is a unique and specialized intensive care unit (ICU) that streamlines the interhospital transfer (IHT—transfer between different hospitals) process for a wide range of patients with critical illness or time-sensitive disease. Previous studies showed the unit successfully increased the number of ICU admissions while reducing the time of transfer in the first year of its establishment. However, its sustainability is unknown. METHODS: This was a descriptive retrospective analysis of adult, non-trauma patients who were transferred to an 800-bed quaternary medical center. Patients transferred to our medical center between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 were eligible. We used interrupted time series (ITS) and descriptive analyses to describe the trend and compare the transfer process between patients who were transferred to the CCRU versus those transferred to other adult inpatient units. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2018, 50,599 patients were transferred to our medical center; 31,582 (62%) were non-trauma adults. Compared with the year prior to the opening of the CCRU, ITS showed a significant increase in IHT after the establishment of the CCRU. The CCRU received a total of 7,788 (25%) IHTs during this period or approximately 20% of total transfers per year. Most transfers (41%) occurred via ground. Median and interquartile range [IQR] of transfer times to other ICUs (156 [65–1027] minutes) were longer than the CCRU (46 [22–139] minutes, P < 0.001). For the CCRU, the most common accepting services were cardiac surgery (16%), neurosurgery (11%), and emergency general surgery (10%). CONCLUSIONS: The CCRU increases the overall number of transfers to our institution, improves patient access to specialty care while decreasing transfer time, and continues to be a sustainable model over time. Additional research is needed to determine if transferring patients to the CCRU would continue to improve patients' outcomes and hospital revenue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9325651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93256512022-07-28 Is the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit Sustainable: A 5-Year Experience of a Beneficial and Novel Model Powell, Elizabeth Sahadzic, Iana Najafali, Daniel Berman, Emilie Andersen, Katie Afridi, Leenah Z. Gasparotti, Zoe Niles, Erin Rea, Jeffrey Scalea, Thomas Haase, Daniel J. Tran, Quincy K. Crit Care Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The 6-bed critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU) is a unique and specialized intensive care unit (ICU) that streamlines the interhospital transfer (IHT—transfer between different hospitals) process for a wide range of patients with critical illness or time-sensitive disease. Previous studies showed the unit successfully increased the number of ICU admissions while reducing the time of transfer in the first year of its establishment. However, its sustainability is unknown. METHODS: This was a descriptive retrospective analysis of adult, non-trauma patients who were transferred to an 800-bed quaternary medical center. Patients transferred to our medical center between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 were eligible. We used interrupted time series (ITS) and descriptive analyses to describe the trend and compare the transfer process between patients who were transferred to the CCRU versus those transferred to other adult inpatient units. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2018, 50,599 patients were transferred to our medical center; 31,582 (62%) were non-trauma adults. Compared with the year prior to the opening of the CCRU, ITS showed a significant increase in IHT after the establishment of the CCRU. The CCRU received a total of 7,788 (25%) IHTs during this period or approximately 20% of total transfers per year. Most transfers (41%) occurred via ground. Median and interquartile range [IQR] of transfer times to other ICUs (156 [65–1027] minutes) were longer than the CCRU (46 [22–139] minutes, P < 0.001). For the CCRU, the most common accepting services were cardiac surgery (16%), neurosurgery (11%), and emergency general surgery (10%). CONCLUSIONS: The CCRU increases the overall number of transfers to our institution, improves patient access to specialty care while decreasing transfer time, and continues to be a sustainable model over time. Additional research is needed to determine if transferring patients to the CCRU would continue to improve patients' outcomes and hospital revenue. Hindawi 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9325651/ /pubmed/35912041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6171598 Text en Copyright © 2022 Elizabeth Powell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Powell, Elizabeth
Sahadzic, Iana
Najafali, Daniel
Berman, Emilie
Andersen, Katie
Afridi, Leenah Z.
Gasparotti, Zoe
Niles, Erin
Rea, Jeffrey
Scalea, Thomas
Haase, Daniel J.
Tran, Quincy K.
Is the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit Sustainable: A 5-Year Experience of a Beneficial and Novel Model
title Is the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit Sustainable: A 5-Year Experience of a Beneficial and Novel Model
title_full Is the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit Sustainable: A 5-Year Experience of a Beneficial and Novel Model
title_fullStr Is the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit Sustainable: A 5-Year Experience of a Beneficial and Novel Model
title_full_unstemmed Is the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit Sustainable: A 5-Year Experience of a Beneficial and Novel Model
title_short Is the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit Sustainable: A 5-Year Experience of a Beneficial and Novel Model
title_sort is the critical care resuscitation unit sustainable: a 5-year experience of a beneficial and novel model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35912041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6171598
work_keys_str_mv AT powellelizabeth isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT sahadziciana isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT najafalidaniel isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT bermanemilie isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT andersenkatie isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT afridileenahz isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT gasparottizoe isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT nileserin isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT reajeffrey isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT scaleathomas isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT haasedanielj isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel
AT tranquincyk isthecriticalcareresuscitationunitsustainablea5yearexperienceofabeneficialandnovelmodel