Cargando…
Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD)
Initial stages of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and adult vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD) harbor similar blue autofluorescence (BAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features. Nevertheless, BVMD is characterized by a worse final stage visual acuity (VA) and an earlier onset of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35882966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16980-z |
_version_ | 1784757126297550848 |
---|---|
author | Crincoli, Emanuele Zhao, Zhanlin Querques, Giuseppe Sacconi, Riccardo Carlà, Matteo Maria Giannuzzi, Federico Ferrara, Silvia Ribarich, Nicolò L’Abbate, Gaia Rizzo, Stanislao Souied, Eric H. Miere, Alexandra |
author_facet | Crincoli, Emanuele Zhao, Zhanlin Querques, Giuseppe Sacconi, Riccardo Carlà, Matteo Maria Giannuzzi, Federico Ferrara, Silvia Ribarich, Nicolò L’Abbate, Gaia Rizzo, Stanislao Souied, Eric H. Miere, Alexandra |
author_sort | Crincoli, Emanuele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Initial stages of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and adult vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD) harbor similar blue autofluorescence (BAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features. Nevertheless, BVMD is characterized by a worse final stage visual acuity (VA) and an earlier onset of critical VA loss. Currently, differential diagnosis requires an invasive and time-consuming process including genetic testing, electrooculography (EOG), full field electroretinogram (ERG), and visual field testing. The aim of our study was to automatically classify OCT and BAF images from stage II BVMD and AVMD eyes using a deep learning algorithm and to identify an image processing method to facilitate human-based clinical diagnosis based on non-invasive tests like BAF and OCT without the use of machine-learning technology. After the application of a customized image processing method, OCT images were characterized by a dark appearance of the vitelliform deposit in the case of BVMD and a lighter inhomogeneous appearance in the case of AVMD. By contrast, a customized method for processing of BAF images revealed that BVMD and AVMD were characterized respectively by the presence or absence of a hypo-autofluorescent region of retina encircling the central hyperautofluorescent foveal lesion. The human-based evaluation of both BAF and OCT images showed significantly higher correspondence to ground truth reference when performed on processed images. The deep learning classifiers based on BAF and OCT images showed around 90% accuracy of classification with both processed and unprocessed images, which was significantly higher than human performance on both processed and unprocessed images. The ability to differentiate between the two entities without recurring to invasive and expensive tests may offer a valuable clinical tool in the management of the two diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9325755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93257552022-07-28 Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD) Crincoli, Emanuele Zhao, Zhanlin Querques, Giuseppe Sacconi, Riccardo Carlà, Matteo Maria Giannuzzi, Federico Ferrara, Silvia Ribarich, Nicolò L’Abbate, Gaia Rizzo, Stanislao Souied, Eric H. Miere, Alexandra Sci Rep Article Initial stages of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and adult vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD) harbor similar blue autofluorescence (BAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features. Nevertheless, BVMD is characterized by a worse final stage visual acuity (VA) and an earlier onset of critical VA loss. Currently, differential diagnosis requires an invasive and time-consuming process including genetic testing, electrooculography (EOG), full field electroretinogram (ERG), and visual field testing. The aim of our study was to automatically classify OCT and BAF images from stage II BVMD and AVMD eyes using a deep learning algorithm and to identify an image processing method to facilitate human-based clinical diagnosis based on non-invasive tests like BAF and OCT without the use of machine-learning technology. After the application of a customized image processing method, OCT images were characterized by a dark appearance of the vitelliform deposit in the case of BVMD and a lighter inhomogeneous appearance in the case of AVMD. By contrast, a customized method for processing of BAF images revealed that BVMD and AVMD were characterized respectively by the presence or absence of a hypo-autofluorescent region of retina encircling the central hyperautofluorescent foveal lesion. The human-based evaluation of both BAF and OCT images showed significantly higher correspondence to ground truth reference when performed on processed images. The deep learning classifiers based on BAF and OCT images showed around 90% accuracy of classification with both processed and unprocessed images, which was significantly higher than human performance on both processed and unprocessed images. The ability to differentiate between the two entities without recurring to invasive and expensive tests may offer a valuable clinical tool in the management of the two diseases. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9325755/ /pubmed/35882966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16980-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Crincoli, Emanuele Zhao, Zhanlin Querques, Giuseppe Sacconi, Riccardo Carlà, Matteo Maria Giannuzzi, Federico Ferrara, Silvia Ribarich, Nicolò L’Abbate, Gaia Rizzo, Stanislao Souied, Eric H. Miere, Alexandra Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD) |
title | Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD) |
title_full | Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD) |
title_fullStr | Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD) |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD) |
title_short | Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD) |
title_sort | deep learning to distinguish best vitelliform macular dystrophy (bvmd) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (avmd) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35882966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16980-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crincoliemanuele deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT zhaozhanlin deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT querquesgiuseppe deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT sacconiriccardo deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT carlamatteomaria deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT giannuzzifederico deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT ferrarasilvia deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT ribarichnicolo deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT labbategaia deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT rizzostanislao deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT souiederich deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd AT mierealexandra deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd |