Cargando…

Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD)

Initial stages of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and adult vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD) harbor similar blue autofluorescence (BAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features. Nevertheless, BVMD is characterized by a worse final stage visual acuity (VA) and an earlier onset of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crincoli, Emanuele, Zhao, Zhanlin, Querques, Giuseppe, Sacconi, Riccardo, Carlà, Matteo Maria, Giannuzzi, Federico, Ferrara, Silvia, Ribarich, Nicolò, L’Abbate, Gaia, Rizzo, Stanislao, Souied, Eric H., Miere, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35882966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16980-z
_version_ 1784757126297550848
author Crincoli, Emanuele
Zhao, Zhanlin
Querques, Giuseppe
Sacconi, Riccardo
Carlà, Matteo Maria
Giannuzzi, Federico
Ferrara, Silvia
Ribarich, Nicolò
L’Abbate, Gaia
Rizzo, Stanislao
Souied, Eric H.
Miere, Alexandra
author_facet Crincoli, Emanuele
Zhao, Zhanlin
Querques, Giuseppe
Sacconi, Riccardo
Carlà, Matteo Maria
Giannuzzi, Federico
Ferrara, Silvia
Ribarich, Nicolò
L’Abbate, Gaia
Rizzo, Stanislao
Souied, Eric H.
Miere, Alexandra
author_sort Crincoli, Emanuele
collection PubMed
description Initial stages of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and adult vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD) harbor similar blue autofluorescence (BAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features. Nevertheless, BVMD is characterized by a worse final stage visual acuity (VA) and an earlier onset of critical VA loss. Currently, differential diagnosis requires an invasive and time-consuming process including genetic testing, electrooculography (EOG), full field electroretinogram (ERG), and visual field testing. The aim of our study was to automatically classify OCT and BAF images from stage II BVMD and AVMD eyes using a deep learning algorithm and to identify an image processing method to facilitate human-based clinical diagnosis based on non-invasive tests like BAF and OCT without the use of machine-learning technology. After the application of a customized image processing method, OCT images were characterized by a dark appearance of the vitelliform deposit in the case of BVMD and a lighter inhomogeneous appearance in the case of AVMD. By contrast, a customized method for processing of BAF images revealed that BVMD and AVMD were characterized respectively by the presence or absence of a hypo-autofluorescent region of retina encircling the central hyperautofluorescent foveal lesion. The human-based evaluation of both BAF and OCT images showed significantly higher correspondence to ground truth reference when performed on processed images. The deep learning classifiers based on BAF and OCT images showed around 90% accuracy of classification with both processed and unprocessed images, which was significantly higher than human performance on both processed and unprocessed images. The ability to differentiate between the two entities without recurring to invasive and expensive tests may offer a valuable clinical tool in the management of the two diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9325755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93257552022-07-28 Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD) Crincoli, Emanuele Zhao, Zhanlin Querques, Giuseppe Sacconi, Riccardo Carlà, Matteo Maria Giannuzzi, Federico Ferrara, Silvia Ribarich, Nicolò L’Abbate, Gaia Rizzo, Stanislao Souied, Eric H. Miere, Alexandra Sci Rep Article Initial stages of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and adult vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD) harbor similar blue autofluorescence (BAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features. Nevertheless, BVMD is characterized by a worse final stage visual acuity (VA) and an earlier onset of critical VA loss. Currently, differential diagnosis requires an invasive and time-consuming process including genetic testing, electrooculography (EOG), full field electroretinogram (ERG), and visual field testing. The aim of our study was to automatically classify OCT and BAF images from stage II BVMD and AVMD eyes using a deep learning algorithm and to identify an image processing method to facilitate human-based clinical diagnosis based on non-invasive tests like BAF and OCT without the use of machine-learning technology. After the application of a customized image processing method, OCT images were characterized by a dark appearance of the vitelliform deposit in the case of BVMD and a lighter inhomogeneous appearance in the case of AVMD. By contrast, a customized method for processing of BAF images revealed that BVMD and AVMD were characterized respectively by the presence or absence of a hypo-autofluorescent region of retina encircling the central hyperautofluorescent foveal lesion. The human-based evaluation of both BAF and OCT images showed significantly higher correspondence to ground truth reference when performed on processed images. The deep learning classifiers based on BAF and OCT images showed around 90% accuracy of classification with both processed and unprocessed images, which was significantly higher than human performance on both processed and unprocessed images. The ability to differentiate between the two entities without recurring to invasive and expensive tests may offer a valuable clinical tool in the management of the two diseases. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9325755/ /pubmed/35882966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16980-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Crincoli, Emanuele
Zhao, Zhanlin
Querques, Giuseppe
Sacconi, Riccardo
Carlà, Matteo Maria
Giannuzzi, Federico
Ferrara, Silvia
Ribarich, Nicolò
L’Abbate, Gaia
Rizzo, Stanislao
Souied, Eric H.
Miere, Alexandra
Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD)
title Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD)
title_full Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD)
title_fullStr Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD)
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD)
title_short Deep learning to distinguish Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (AVMD)
title_sort deep learning to distinguish best vitelliform macular dystrophy (bvmd) from adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration (avmd)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35882966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16980-z
work_keys_str_mv AT crincoliemanuele deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT zhaozhanlin deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT querquesgiuseppe deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT sacconiriccardo deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT carlamatteomaria deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT giannuzzifederico deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT ferrarasilvia deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT ribarichnicolo deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT labbategaia deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT rizzostanislao deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT souiederich deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd
AT mierealexandra deeplearningtodistinguishbestvitelliformmaculardystrophybvmdfromadultonsetvitelliformmaculardegenerationavmd