Cargando…
A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota
Some nanomaterials (NMs) have been shown to possess antimicrobial activity and cause GM dysbiosis. Since NMs are being used widely, a systematic assessment of the effects of NMs on GM is warranted. In this systematic review, a total of 46 in vivo and 22 in vitro studies were retrieved from databases...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100118 |
_version_ | 1784757135237709824 |
---|---|
author | Utembe, W Tlotleng, N Kamng'ona, AW |
author_facet | Utembe, W Tlotleng, N Kamng'ona, AW |
author_sort | Utembe, W |
collection | PubMed |
description | Some nanomaterials (NMs) have been shown to possess antimicrobial activity and cause GM dysbiosis. Since NMs are being used widely, a systematic assessment of the effects of NMs on GM is warranted. In this systematic review, a total of 46 in vivo and 22 in vitro studies were retrieved from databases and search engines including Science-Direct, Pubmed and Google scholar. Criteria for assessment of studies included use of in vitro or in vivo studies, characterization of NMs, use of single or multiple doses as well as consistency of results. GM dysbiosis has been studied most widely on TiO(2), Ag, Zn-based NMs. There was moderate evidence for GM dysbiosis caused by Zn- and Cu-based NMs, Cu-loaded chitosan NPs and Ag NMs, and anatase TiO(2) NPs, as well as low evidence for SWCNTs, nanocellulose, SiO(2), Se, nanoplastics, CeO(2,) MoO(3) and graphene-based NMs. Most studies indicate adverse effects of NMs towards GM. However, more work is required to elucidate the differences on the reported effects of NM by type and sex of organisms, size, shape and surface properties of NMs as well as effects of exposure to mixtures of NMs. For consistency and better agreement among studies on GM dysbiosis, there is need for internationally agreed protocols on, inter alia, characterization of NMs, dosing (amounts, frequency and duration), use of sonication, test systems (both in vitro and in vivo), including oxygen levels for in vitro models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9325792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93257922022-07-28 A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota Utembe, W Tlotleng, N Kamng'ona, AW Curr Res Microb Sci Review Article Some nanomaterials (NMs) have been shown to possess antimicrobial activity and cause GM dysbiosis. Since NMs are being used widely, a systematic assessment of the effects of NMs on GM is warranted. In this systematic review, a total of 46 in vivo and 22 in vitro studies were retrieved from databases and search engines including Science-Direct, Pubmed and Google scholar. Criteria for assessment of studies included use of in vitro or in vivo studies, characterization of NMs, use of single or multiple doses as well as consistency of results. GM dysbiosis has been studied most widely on TiO(2), Ag, Zn-based NMs. There was moderate evidence for GM dysbiosis caused by Zn- and Cu-based NMs, Cu-loaded chitosan NPs and Ag NMs, and anatase TiO(2) NPs, as well as low evidence for SWCNTs, nanocellulose, SiO(2), Se, nanoplastics, CeO(2,) MoO(3) and graphene-based NMs. Most studies indicate adverse effects of NMs towards GM. However, more work is required to elucidate the differences on the reported effects of NM by type and sex of organisms, size, shape and surface properties of NMs as well as effects of exposure to mixtures of NMs. For consistency and better agreement among studies on GM dysbiosis, there is need for internationally agreed protocols on, inter alia, characterization of NMs, dosing (amounts, frequency and duration), use of sonication, test systems (both in vitro and in vivo), including oxygen levels for in vitro models. Elsevier 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9325792/ /pubmed/35909630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100118 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Utembe, W Tlotleng, N Kamng'ona, AW A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota |
title | A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota |
title_full | A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota |
title_fullStr | A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota |
title_short | A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota |
title_sort | systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT utembew asystematicreviewontheeffectsofnanomaterialsongutmicrobiota AT tlotlengn asystematicreviewontheeffectsofnanomaterialsongutmicrobiota AT kamngonaaw asystematicreviewontheeffectsofnanomaterialsongutmicrobiota AT utembew systematicreviewontheeffectsofnanomaterialsongutmicrobiota AT tlotlengn systematicreviewontheeffectsofnanomaterialsongutmicrobiota AT kamngonaaw systematicreviewontheeffectsofnanomaterialsongutmicrobiota |