Cargando…
Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network
BACKGROUND: Consumer wearables and smartphone devices commonly offer an estimate of energy expenditure (EE) to assist in the objective monitoring of physical activity to the general population. Alongside consumers, healthcare professionals and researchers are seeking to utilise these devices for the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01665-4 |
_version_ | 1784757138542821376 |
---|---|
author | Argent, Rob Hetherington-Rauth, Megan Stang, Julie Tarp, Jakob Ortega, Francisco B. Molina-Garcia, Pablo Schumann, Moritz Bloch, Wilhelm Cheng, Sulin Grøntved, Anders Brønd, Jan Christian Ekelund, Ulf Sardinha, Luis B. Caulfield, Brian |
author_facet | Argent, Rob Hetherington-Rauth, Megan Stang, Julie Tarp, Jakob Ortega, Francisco B. Molina-Garcia, Pablo Schumann, Moritz Bloch, Wilhelm Cheng, Sulin Grøntved, Anders Brønd, Jan Christian Ekelund, Ulf Sardinha, Luis B. Caulfield, Brian |
author_sort | Argent, Rob |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Consumer wearables and smartphone devices commonly offer an estimate of energy expenditure (EE) to assist in the objective monitoring of physical activity to the general population. Alongside consumers, healthcare professionals and researchers are seeking to utilise these devices for the monitoring of training and improving human health. However, the methods of validation and reporting of EE estimation in these devices lacks rigour, negatively impacting on the ability to make comparisons between devices and provide transparent accuracy. OBJECTIVES: The Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The network was founded in 2019 and strives towards developing best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables and smartphones in the estimation of EE. METHODS: The recommendations were developed through (1) a systematic literature review; (2) an unstructured review of the wider literature discussing the potential factors that may introduce bias during validation studies; and (3) evidence-informed expert opinions from members of the INTERLIVE network. RESULTS: The systematic literature review process identified 1645 potential articles, of which 62 were deemed eligible for the final dataset. Based on these studies and the wider literature search, a validation framework is proposed encompassing six key domains for validation: the target population, criterion measure, index measure, testing conditions, data processing and the statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The INTERLIVE network recommends that the proposed protocol, and checklists provided, are used to standardise the testing and reporting of the validation of any consumer wearable or smartphone device to estimate EE. This in turn will maximise the potential utility of these technologies for clinicians, researchers, consumers, and manufacturers/developers, while ensuring transparency, comparability, and replicability in validation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD42021223508. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-022-01665-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9325806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93258062022-07-28 Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network Argent, Rob Hetherington-Rauth, Megan Stang, Julie Tarp, Jakob Ortega, Francisco B. Molina-Garcia, Pablo Schumann, Moritz Bloch, Wilhelm Cheng, Sulin Grøntved, Anders Brønd, Jan Christian Ekelund, Ulf Sardinha, Luis B. Caulfield, Brian Sports Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Consumer wearables and smartphone devices commonly offer an estimate of energy expenditure (EE) to assist in the objective monitoring of physical activity to the general population. Alongside consumers, healthcare professionals and researchers are seeking to utilise these devices for the monitoring of training and improving human health. However, the methods of validation and reporting of EE estimation in these devices lacks rigour, negatively impacting on the ability to make comparisons between devices and provide transparent accuracy. OBJECTIVES: The Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The network was founded in 2019 and strives towards developing best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables and smartphones in the estimation of EE. METHODS: The recommendations were developed through (1) a systematic literature review; (2) an unstructured review of the wider literature discussing the potential factors that may introduce bias during validation studies; and (3) evidence-informed expert opinions from members of the INTERLIVE network. RESULTS: The systematic literature review process identified 1645 potential articles, of which 62 were deemed eligible for the final dataset. Based on these studies and the wider literature search, a validation framework is proposed encompassing six key domains for validation: the target population, criterion measure, index measure, testing conditions, data processing and the statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The INTERLIVE network recommends that the proposed protocol, and checklists provided, are used to standardise the testing and reporting of the validation of any consumer wearable or smartphone device to estimate EE. This in turn will maximise the potential utility of these technologies for clinicians, researchers, consumers, and manufacturers/developers, while ensuring transparency, comparability, and replicability in validation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD42021223508. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40279-022-01665-4. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9325806/ /pubmed/35260991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01665-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Argent, Rob Hetherington-Rauth, Megan Stang, Julie Tarp, Jakob Ortega, Francisco B. Molina-Garcia, Pablo Schumann, Moritz Bloch, Wilhelm Cheng, Sulin Grøntved, Anders Brønd, Jan Christian Ekelund, Ulf Sardinha, Luis B. Caulfield, Brian Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network |
title | Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network |
title_full | Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network |
title_fullStr | Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network |
title_full_unstemmed | Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network |
title_short | Recommendations for Determining the Validity of Consumer Wearables and Smartphones for the Estimation of Energy Expenditure: Expert Statement and Checklist of the INTERLIVE Network |
title_sort | recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones for the estimation of energy expenditure: expert statement and checklist of the interlive network |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01665-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT argentrob recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT hetheringtonrauthmegan recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT stangjulie recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT tarpjakob recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT ortegafranciscob recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT molinagarciapablo recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT schumannmoritz recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT blochwilhelm recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT chengsulin recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT grøntvedanders recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT brøndjanchristian recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT ekelundulf recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT sardinhaluisb recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork AT caulfieldbrian recommendationsfordeterminingthevalidityofconsumerwearablesandsmartphonesfortheestimationofenergyexpenditureexpertstatementandchecklistoftheinterlivenetwork |