Cargando…

Predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status

PURPOSE: To determine the predictability of success and the risk of open conjunctival revision in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study involving 132 eyes of 66 participants who had undergone intraocular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiessling, D., Rennings, C., Hild, M., Lappas, A., Dietlein, T.S., Roessler, G.F., Widder, R.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05569-x
_version_ 1784757150125391872
author Kiessling, D.
Rennings, C.
Hild, M.
Lappas, A.
Dietlein, T.S.
Roessler, G.F.
Widder, R.A.
author_facet Kiessling, D.
Rennings, C.
Hild, M.
Lappas, A.
Dietlein, T.S.
Roessler, G.F.
Widder, R.A.
author_sort Kiessling, D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the predictability of success and the risk of open conjunctival revision in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study involving 132 eyes of 66 participants who had undergone intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering XEN45 Gel Stent implantation, either as a standalone procedure in phakic and pseudophakic eyes or in combination with phacoemulsification. Successful surgery was defined by three scores: IOP at follow-up < 21 mmHg (score A) or < 18 mmHg (score B) and an IOP reduction > 20% or IOP ≤ 15 mmHg and an IOP reduction ≥ 40% (score C). In all scores, one open conjunctival revision was allowed, and additional repeat surgery was considered a failure. The predictability of success and revision rate depending on the outcome of the first eye were calculated using Bayes’ theorem. RESULTS: IOP-lowering did not differ significantly between the first and second eyes. Success rates of standalone surgery in the second eye after successful surgery in the first eye significantly exceed rates after prior failure. For the combined procedure, the rates did not differ significantly. For score A, we determined a 76.6% chance of success following a prior success and a 57.9% chance, if prior surgery failed. The corresponding probabilities were 75% and 59.1% for score B, while 66.7% and 15.7% for score C, respectively. We calculated a 60% risk for revision surgery in the standalone phakic group. If the first eye was not revised, the risk of revision in the subsequent eye was 20%. The corresponding risks were 72.7% and 5% for the standalone procedure in pseudophakic patients and 38.4% and 41.7% for the combined procedure, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of our study offer a tool to predict the outcome of subsequent eye surgeries based on either the outcome in the initial eye and the type of surgery performed, owing to the high predictive potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9325854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93258542022-07-28 Predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status Kiessling, D. Rennings, C. Hild, M. Lappas, A. Dietlein, T.S. Roessler, G.F. Widder, R.A. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Glaucoma PURPOSE: To determine the predictability of success and the risk of open conjunctival revision in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study involving 132 eyes of 66 participants who had undergone intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering XEN45 Gel Stent implantation, either as a standalone procedure in phakic and pseudophakic eyes or in combination with phacoemulsification. Successful surgery was defined by three scores: IOP at follow-up < 21 mmHg (score A) or < 18 mmHg (score B) and an IOP reduction > 20% or IOP ≤ 15 mmHg and an IOP reduction ≥ 40% (score C). In all scores, one open conjunctival revision was allowed, and additional repeat surgery was considered a failure. The predictability of success and revision rate depending on the outcome of the first eye were calculated using Bayes’ theorem. RESULTS: IOP-lowering did not differ significantly between the first and second eyes. Success rates of standalone surgery in the second eye after successful surgery in the first eye significantly exceed rates after prior failure. For the combined procedure, the rates did not differ significantly. For score A, we determined a 76.6% chance of success following a prior success and a 57.9% chance, if prior surgery failed. The corresponding probabilities were 75% and 59.1% for score B, while 66.7% and 15.7% for score C, respectively. We calculated a 60% risk for revision surgery in the standalone phakic group. If the first eye was not revised, the risk of revision in the subsequent eye was 20%. The corresponding risks were 72.7% and 5% for the standalone procedure in pseudophakic patients and 38.4% and 41.7% for the combined procedure, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of our study offer a tool to predict the outcome of subsequent eye surgeries based on either the outcome in the initial eye and the type of surgery performed, owing to the high predictive potential. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9325854/ /pubmed/35113249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05569-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Glaucoma
Kiessling, D.
Rennings, C.
Hild, M.
Lappas, A.
Dietlein, T.S.
Roessler, G.F.
Widder, R.A.
Predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status
title Predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status
title_full Predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status
title_fullStr Predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status
title_full_unstemmed Predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status
title_short Predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after XEN45 Gel Stent implantation according to lens status
title_sort predictability of success and open conjunctival revision rates in the subsequent eye after xen45 gel stent implantation according to lens status
topic Glaucoma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9325854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05569-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kiesslingd predictabilityofsuccessandopenconjunctivalrevisionratesinthesubsequenteyeafterxen45gelstentimplantationaccordingtolensstatus
AT renningsc predictabilityofsuccessandopenconjunctivalrevisionratesinthesubsequenteyeafterxen45gelstentimplantationaccordingtolensstatus
AT hildm predictabilityofsuccessandopenconjunctivalrevisionratesinthesubsequenteyeafterxen45gelstentimplantationaccordingtolensstatus
AT lappasa predictabilityofsuccessandopenconjunctivalrevisionratesinthesubsequenteyeafterxen45gelstentimplantationaccordingtolensstatus
AT dietleints predictabilityofsuccessandopenconjunctivalrevisionratesinthesubsequenteyeafterxen45gelstentimplantationaccordingtolensstatus
AT roesslergf predictabilityofsuccessandopenconjunctivalrevisionratesinthesubsequenteyeafterxen45gelstentimplantationaccordingtolensstatus
AT widderra predictabilityofsuccessandopenconjunctivalrevisionratesinthesubsequenteyeafterxen45gelstentimplantationaccordingtolensstatus