Cargando…
Gemcitabine Plus Anlotinib Is Effective and Safe Compared to Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare gemcitabine (G) plus docetaxel (D) versus G plus anlotinib (A) for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 122 patients with locally advanced or metastatic STS who were treated with either G+D or G+A between July 201...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9326030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35912272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.922127 |
_version_ | 1784757185030389760 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Zhiyong Wang, Xin Wang, Jiaqiang Zhang, Peng Li, Chao Wang, Bangmin Liu, Guancong Yao, Weitao |
author_facet | Liu, Zhiyong Wang, Xin Wang, Jiaqiang Zhang, Peng Li, Chao Wang, Bangmin Liu, Guancong Yao, Weitao |
author_sort | Liu, Zhiyong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare gemcitabine (G) plus docetaxel (D) versus G plus anlotinib (A) for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 122 patients with locally advanced or metastatic STS who were treated with either G+D or G+A between July 2016 and October 2021 and compared the efficacy and toxicity of G+D and G+A. The primary endpoints were median progression-free survival (PFS) and the proportion of patients with grade ≥3 adverse events. We also analyzed differences in the clinical efficacy of G+D and G+A in leiomyosarcoma, and the differences in the clinical efficacy of G+D and G+A as first-line therapy. RESULTS: Overall, 122 patients were included (81 patients receiving G+D and 41 patients receiving G+A) with a median age of 55 years. The main histological types are leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and liposarcoma. After a median follow-up of 25 months, PFS did not differ between patients treated with G+D and those treated with G+A (median PFS: 5.8 months and 6.8 months, p = 0.39), and overall survival (OS) was similar (median OS: 14.7 vs. 13.3 months, p = 0.75) with a similar objective response rate (18.5% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.17), whereas the proportion of patients with grade ≥3 adverse events treated with G+D was significantly higher than those treated with G+A (68% vs. 44%, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of leiomyosarcoma patients (47.5% of the patients) and first-line treatment patients (46.7% of the patients) shows that PFS was not significantly different between the two groups (LMS: median PFS: 6.5 months vs. 7.5 months, p = 0.08; first-line treatment: median PFS: 6.2 months vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Compared with gemcitabine plus docetaxel for advanced STS, gemcitabine plus anlotinib achieved a similar response rate on median PFS and OS, but lower toxicity. These results suggest that gemcitabine plus anlotinib may be an effective and safe strategy for advanced STS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9326030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93260302022-07-28 Gemcitabine Plus Anlotinib Is Effective and Safe Compared to Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Liu, Zhiyong Wang, Xin Wang, Jiaqiang Zhang, Peng Li, Chao Wang, Bangmin Liu, Guancong Yao, Weitao Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare gemcitabine (G) plus docetaxel (D) versus G plus anlotinib (A) for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 122 patients with locally advanced or metastatic STS who were treated with either G+D or G+A between July 2016 and October 2021 and compared the efficacy and toxicity of G+D and G+A. The primary endpoints were median progression-free survival (PFS) and the proportion of patients with grade ≥3 adverse events. We also analyzed differences in the clinical efficacy of G+D and G+A in leiomyosarcoma, and the differences in the clinical efficacy of G+D and G+A as first-line therapy. RESULTS: Overall, 122 patients were included (81 patients receiving G+D and 41 patients receiving G+A) with a median age of 55 years. The main histological types are leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and liposarcoma. After a median follow-up of 25 months, PFS did not differ between patients treated with G+D and those treated with G+A (median PFS: 5.8 months and 6.8 months, p = 0.39), and overall survival (OS) was similar (median OS: 14.7 vs. 13.3 months, p = 0.75) with a similar objective response rate (18.5% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.17), whereas the proportion of patients with grade ≥3 adverse events treated with G+D was significantly higher than those treated with G+A (68% vs. 44%, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of leiomyosarcoma patients (47.5% of the patients) and first-line treatment patients (46.7% of the patients) shows that PFS was not significantly different between the two groups (LMS: median PFS: 6.5 months vs. 7.5 months, p = 0.08; first-line treatment: median PFS: 6.2 months vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Compared with gemcitabine plus docetaxel for advanced STS, gemcitabine plus anlotinib achieved a similar response rate on median PFS and OS, but lower toxicity. These results suggest that gemcitabine plus anlotinib may be an effective and safe strategy for advanced STS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9326030/ /pubmed/35912272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.922127 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Wang, Wang, Zhang, Li, Wang, Liu and Yao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Liu, Zhiyong Wang, Xin Wang, Jiaqiang Zhang, Peng Li, Chao Wang, Bangmin Liu, Guancong Yao, Weitao Gemcitabine Plus Anlotinib Is Effective and Safe Compared to Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title | Gemcitabine Plus Anlotinib Is Effective and Safe Compared to Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title_full | Gemcitabine Plus Anlotinib Is Effective and Safe Compared to Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title_fullStr | Gemcitabine Plus Anlotinib Is Effective and Safe Compared to Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Gemcitabine Plus Anlotinib Is Effective and Safe Compared to Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title_short | Gemcitabine Plus Anlotinib Is Effective and Safe Compared to Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma |
title_sort | gemcitabine plus anlotinib is effective and safe compared to gemcitabine plus docetaxel in advanced soft tissue sarcoma |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9326030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35912272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.922127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuzhiyong gemcitabineplusanlotinibiseffectiveandsafecomparedtogemcitabineplusdocetaxelinadvancedsofttissuesarcoma AT wangxin gemcitabineplusanlotinibiseffectiveandsafecomparedtogemcitabineplusdocetaxelinadvancedsofttissuesarcoma AT wangjiaqiang gemcitabineplusanlotinibiseffectiveandsafecomparedtogemcitabineplusdocetaxelinadvancedsofttissuesarcoma AT zhangpeng gemcitabineplusanlotinibiseffectiveandsafecomparedtogemcitabineplusdocetaxelinadvancedsofttissuesarcoma AT lichao gemcitabineplusanlotinibiseffectiveandsafecomparedtogemcitabineplusdocetaxelinadvancedsofttissuesarcoma AT wangbangmin gemcitabineplusanlotinibiseffectiveandsafecomparedtogemcitabineplusdocetaxelinadvancedsofttissuesarcoma AT liuguancong gemcitabineplusanlotinibiseffectiveandsafecomparedtogemcitabineplusdocetaxelinadvancedsofttissuesarcoma AT yaoweitao gemcitabineplusanlotinibiseffectiveandsafecomparedtogemcitabineplusdocetaxelinadvancedsofttissuesarcoma |