Cargando…
Discrepancy review: a feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications
Undisclosed discrepancies often exist between study registrations and their associated publications. Discrepancies can increase risk of bias, and when undisclosed, they disguise this increased risk of bias from readers. To remedy this issue, we developed an intervention called discrepancy review. We...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9326291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220142 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Discrepancies between registration and publication of randomised controlled trials: an observational study
por: Walker, Kate F, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses
Publicado: (2023) -
Undisclosed financial ties between guideline writers and pharmaceutical companies: a cross-sectional study across 10 disease categories
por: Moynihan, Ray, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Private-Public Opinion Discrepancy
por: Manfredi, Ren, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The impact of peer review on the contribution potential of scientific papers
por: Matsui, Akira, et al.
Publicado: (2021)