Cargando…

The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening

Progress in newborn screening (NBS) has been driven for 60 years by developments in science and technology, growing consumer advocacy, the actions of providers involved in the care of rare disease patients, and by federal and State government funding and policies. With the current explosion of clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Michael S., Lloyd-Puryear, Michele A., Howell, R. Rodney
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9326622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892471
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030041
_version_ 1784757330236145664
author Watson, Michael S.
Lloyd-Puryear, Michele A.
Howell, R. Rodney
author_facet Watson, Michael S.
Lloyd-Puryear, Michele A.
Howell, R. Rodney
author_sort Watson, Michael S.
collection PubMed
description Progress in newborn screening (NBS) has been driven for 60 years by developments in science and technology, growing consumer advocacy, the actions of providers involved in the care of rare disease patients, and by federal and State government funding and policies. With the current explosion of clinical trials of treatments for rare diseases, the pressure for expansion has grown, and concerns about the capacity for improvement and growth are being expressed. Genome and exome sequencing (GS/ES) have now opened more opportunities for early identification and disease prevention at all points in the lifespan. The greatest challenge facing NBS stems from the conditions most amenable to screening, and new treatment development is that we are screening for rare genetic diseases. In addition, understanding the spectrum of severity requires vast amounts of population and genomic data. We propose recommendations on improving the NBS system and addressing specific demands to grow its capacity by: better defining the criteria by which screening targets are established; financing the NBS system’s responsiveness to opportunities for expansion, including engagement and funding from stakeholders; creating a national quality assurance, data, IT, and communications infrastructure; and improving intra-governmental communications. While our recommendations may be specific to the United States, the underlying issues should be considered when working to improve NBS programs globally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9326622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93266222022-07-28 The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening Watson, Michael S. Lloyd-Puryear, Michele A. Howell, R. Rodney Int J Neonatal Screen Review Progress in newborn screening (NBS) has been driven for 60 years by developments in science and technology, growing consumer advocacy, the actions of providers involved in the care of rare disease patients, and by federal and State government funding and policies. With the current explosion of clinical trials of treatments for rare diseases, the pressure for expansion has grown, and concerns about the capacity for improvement and growth are being expressed. Genome and exome sequencing (GS/ES) have now opened more opportunities for early identification and disease prevention at all points in the lifespan. The greatest challenge facing NBS stems from the conditions most amenable to screening, and new treatment development is that we are screening for rare genetic diseases. In addition, understanding the spectrum of severity requires vast amounts of population and genomic data. We propose recommendations on improving the NBS system and addressing specific demands to grow its capacity by: better defining the criteria by which screening targets are established; financing the NBS system’s responsiveness to opportunities for expansion, including engagement and funding from stakeholders; creating a national quality assurance, data, IT, and communications infrastructure; and improving intra-governmental communications. While our recommendations may be specific to the United States, the underlying issues should be considered when working to improve NBS programs globally. MDPI 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9326622/ /pubmed/35892471 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030041 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Watson, Michael S.
Lloyd-Puryear, Michele A.
Howell, R. Rodney
The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening
title The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening
title_full The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening
title_fullStr The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening
title_full_unstemmed The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening
title_short The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening
title_sort progress and future of us newborn screening
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9326622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892471
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030041
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonmichaels theprogressandfutureofusnewbornscreening
AT lloydpuryearmichelea theprogressandfutureofusnewbornscreening
AT howellrrodney theprogressandfutureofusnewbornscreening
AT watsonmichaels progressandfutureofusnewbornscreening
AT lloydpuryearmichelea progressandfutureofusnewbornscreening
AT howellrrodney progressandfutureofusnewbornscreening