Cargando…
The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening
Progress in newborn screening (NBS) has been driven for 60 years by developments in science and technology, growing consumer advocacy, the actions of providers involved in the care of rare disease patients, and by federal and State government funding and policies. With the current explosion of clini...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9326622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892471 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030041 |
_version_ | 1784757330236145664 |
---|---|
author | Watson, Michael S. Lloyd-Puryear, Michele A. Howell, R. Rodney |
author_facet | Watson, Michael S. Lloyd-Puryear, Michele A. Howell, R. Rodney |
author_sort | Watson, Michael S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Progress in newborn screening (NBS) has been driven for 60 years by developments in science and technology, growing consumer advocacy, the actions of providers involved in the care of rare disease patients, and by federal and State government funding and policies. With the current explosion of clinical trials of treatments for rare diseases, the pressure for expansion has grown, and concerns about the capacity for improvement and growth are being expressed. Genome and exome sequencing (GS/ES) have now opened more opportunities for early identification and disease prevention at all points in the lifespan. The greatest challenge facing NBS stems from the conditions most amenable to screening, and new treatment development is that we are screening for rare genetic diseases. In addition, understanding the spectrum of severity requires vast amounts of population and genomic data. We propose recommendations on improving the NBS system and addressing specific demands to grow its capacity by: better defining the criteria by which screening targets are established; financing the NBS system’s responsiveness to opportunities for expansion, including engagement and funding from stakeholders; creating a national quality assurance, data, IT, and communications infrastructure; and improving intra-governmental communications. While our recommendations may be specific to the United States, the underlying issues should be considered when working to improve NBS programs globally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9326622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93266222022-07-28 The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening Watson, Michael S. Lloyd-Puryear, Michele A. Howell, R. Rodney Int J Neonatal Screen Review Progress in newborn screening (NBS) has been driven for 60 years by developments in science and technology, growing consumer advocacy, the actions of providers involved in the care of rare disease patients, and by federal and State government funding and policies. With the current explosion of clinical trials of treatments for rare diseases, the pressure for expansion has grown, and concerns about the capacity for improvement and growth are being expressed. Genome and exome sequencing (GS/ES) have now opened more opportunities for early identification and disease prevention at all points in the lifespan. The greatest challenge facing NBS stems from the conditions most amenable to screening, and new treatment development is that we are screening for rare genetic diseases. In addition, understanding the spectrum of severity requires vast amounts of population and genomic data. We propose recommendations on improving the NBS system and addressing specific demands to grow its capacity by: better defining the criteria by which screening targets are established; financing the NBS system’s responsiveness to opportunities for expansion, including engagement and funding from stakeholders; creating a national quality assurance, data, IT, and communications infrastructure; and improving intra-governmental communications. While our recommendations may be specific to the United States, the underlying issues should be considered when working to improve NBS programs globally. MDPI 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9326622/ /pubmed/35892471 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030041 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Watson, Michael S. Lloyd-Puryear, Michele A. Howell, R. Rodney The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening |
title | The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening |
title_full | The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening |
title_fullStr | The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening |
title_full_unstemmed | The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening |
title_short | The Progress and Future of US Newborn Screening |
title_sort | progress and future of us newborn screening |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9326622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892471 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns8030041 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watsonmichaels theprogressandfutureofusnewbornscreening AT lloydpuryearmichelea theprogressandfutureofusnewbornscreening AT howellrrodney theprogressandfutureofusnewbornscreening AT watsonmichaels progressandfutureofusnewbornscreening AT lloydpuryearmichelea progressandfutureofusnewbornscreening AT howellrrodney progressandfutureofusnewbornscreening |