Cargando…

Diabetes mellitus lowers the chance of short-term urinary continence recovery in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article was to test the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on short-term urinary continence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify patients who underwent RP between 11/2018...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Philippi, Alexander, Mandel, Philipp, Hohenhorst, Jan L., Wenzel, Mike, Humke, Clara, Wittler, Clarissa, Köllermann, Jens, Steuber, Thomas, Graefen, Markus, Tilki, Derya, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Preisser, Felix, Becker, Andreas, Kluth, Luis A., Chun, Felix K.H., Hoeh, Benedikt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9326700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937658
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2022.0279.R1
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article was to test the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on short-term urinary continence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify patients who underwent RP between 11/2018 and 02/2021 with data available on short-term urinary continence status (30–90 days post-surgery). Continence was defined as the usage of no or one safety-pad within 24 hours. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models tested the correlation between DM and short-term continence. Covariates consisted of pathological T-stage, body mass index, prostate volume, surgical approach and nerve-sparing. RESULTS: Of 142 eligible patients, 15 (11%) patients exhibited concomitant DM. Patients diagnosed with DM exhibited lower continence rates at short-term follow-up compared to patients without DM (33 vs 63%, p = 0.03). In univariable and multivariable logistic regression models, DM was strongly associated with reduced chances of short-term urinary continence recovery (multivariable odds ratio [OR]: 0.26, 95%-CI: 0.07–0.86; p = 0.03). Furthermore, pathological T-stage (pT3/pT4) was additionally associated with reduced chance of urinary continence in logistic regression models (multivariable OR: 0.43, 95%-CI: 0.19–0.94; p = 0.04). Other covariables failed to reach statistical significance in multivariable logistic regression analyses predicting urinary continence. CONCLUSIONS: DM was associated with lower chances of short-term urinary continence recovery in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Patients with DM should be preoperatively informed and intensified, postoperative pelvic floor training should be considered in this subgroup of RP patients.