Cargando…

AI Denoising Improves Image Quality and Radiological Workflows in Pediatric Ultra-Low-Dose Thorax Computed Tomography Scans

(1) This study evaluates the impact of an AI denoising algorithm on image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and radiological workflows in pediatric chest ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT). (2) Methods: 100 consecutive pediatric thorax ULDCT were included and reconstructed using weighted filtered back projection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brendlin, Andreas S., Schmid, Ulrich, Plajer, David, Chaika, Maryanna, Mader, Markus, Wrazidlo, Robin, Männlin, Simon, Spogis, Jakob, Estler, Arne, Esser, Michael, Schäfer, Jürgen, Afat, Saif, Tsiflikas, Ilias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9326759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35894005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8040140
_version_ 1784757365524922368
author Brendlin, Andreas S.
Schmid, Ulrich
Plajer, David
Chaika, Maryanna
Mader, Markus
Wrazidlo, Robin
Männlin, Simon
Spogis, Jakob
Estler, Arne
Esser, Michael
Schäfer, Jürgen
Afat, Saif
Tsiflikas, Ilias
author_facet Brendlin, Andreas S.
Schmid, Ulrich
Plajer, David
Chaika, Maryanna
Mader, Markus
Wrazidlo, Robin
Männlin, Simon
Spogis, Jakob
Estler, Arne
Esser, Michael
Schäfer, Jürgen
Afat, Saif
Tsiflikas, Ilias
author_sort Brendlin, Andreas S.
collection PubMed
description (1) This study evaluates the impact of an AI denoising algorithm on image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and radiological workflows in pediatric chest ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT). (2) Methods: 100 consecutive pediatric thorax ULDCT were included and reconstructed using weighted filtered back projection (wFBP), iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE 2), and AI denoising (PixelShine). Place-consistent noise measurements were used to compare objective image quality. Eight blinded readers independently rated the subjective image quality on a Likert scale (1 = worst to 5 = best). Each reader wrote a semiquantitative report to evaluate disease severity using a severity score with six common pathologies. The time to diagnosis was measured for each reader to compare the possible workflow benefits. Properly corrected mixed-effects analysis with post-hoc subgroup tests were used. Spearman’s correlation coefficient measured inter-reader agreement for the subjective image quality analysis and the severity score sheets. (3) Results: The highest noise was measured for wFBP, followed by ADMIRE 2, and PixelShine (76.9 ± 9.62 vs. 43.4 ± 4.45 vs. 34.8 ± 3.27 HU; each p < 0.001). The highest subjective image quality was measured for PixelShine, followed by ADMIRE 2, and wFBP (4 (4–5) vs. 3 (4–5) vs. 3 (2–4), each p < 0.001) with good inter-rater agreement (r ≥ 0.790; p ≤ 0.001). In diagnostic accuracy analysis, there was a good inter-rater agreement between the severity scores (r ≥ 0.764; p < 0.001) without significant differences between severity score items per reconstruction mode (F (5.71; 566) = 0.792; p = 0.570). The shortest time to diagnosis was measured for the PixelShine datasets, followed by ADMIRE 2, and wFBP (2.28 ± 1.56 vs. 2.45 ± 1.90 vs. 2.66 ± 2.31 min; F (1.000; 99.00) = 268.1; p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: AI denoising significantly improves image quality in pediatric thorax ULDCT without compromising the diagnostic confidence and reduces the time to diagnosis substantially.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9326759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93267592022-07-28 AI Denoising Improves Image Quality and Radiological Workflows in Pediatric Ultra-Low-Dose Thorax Computed Tomography Scans Brendlin, Andreas S. Schmid, Ulrich Plajer, David Chaika, Maryanna Mader, Markus Wrazidlo, Robin Männlin, Simon Spogis, Jakob Estler, Arne Esser, Michael Schäfer, Jürgen Afat, Saif Tsiflikas, Ilias Tomography Article (1) This study evaluates the impact of an AI denoising algorithm on image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and radiological workflows in pediatric chest ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT). (2) Methods: 100 consecutive pediatric thorax ULDCT were included and reconstructed using weighted filtered back projection (wFBP), iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE 2), and AI denoising (PixelShine). Place-consistent noise measurements were used to compare objective image quality. Eight blinded readers independently rated the subjective image quality on a Likert scale (1 = worst to 5 = best). Each reader wrote a semiquantitative report to evaluate disease severity using a severity score with six common pathologies. The time to diagnosis was measured for each reader to compare the possible workflow benefits. Properly corrected mixed-effects analysis with post-hoc subgroup tests were used. Spearman’s correlation coefficient measured inter-reader agreement for the subjective image quality analysis and the severity score sheets. (3) Results: The highest noise was measured for wFBP, followed by ADMIRE 2, and PixelShine (76.9 ± 9.62 vs. 43.4 ± 4.45 vs. 34.8 ± 3.27 HU; each p < 0.001). The highest subjective image quality was measured for PixelShine, followed by ADMIRE 2, and wFBP (4 (4–5) vs. 3 (4–5) vs. 3 (2–4), each p < 0.001) with good inter-rater agreement (r ≥ 0.790; p ≤ 0.001). In diagnostic accuracy analysis, there was a good inter-rater agreement between the severity scores (r ≥ 0.764; p < 0.001) without significant differences between severity score items per reconstruction mode (F (5.71; 566) = 0.792; p = 0.570). The shortest time to diagnosis was measured for the PixelShine datasets, followed by ADMIRE 2, and wFBP (2.28 ± 1.56 vs. 2.45 ± 1.90 vs. 2.66 ± 2.31 min; F (1.000; 99.00) = 268.1; p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: AI denoising significantly improves image quality in pediatric thorax ULDCT without compromising the diagnostic confidence and reduces the time to diagnosis substantially. MDPI 2022-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9326759/ /pubmed/35894005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8040140 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brendlin, Andreas S.
Schmid, Ulrich
Plajer, David
Chaika, Maryanna
Mader, Markus
Wrazidlo, Robin
Männlin, Simon
Spogis, Jakob
Estler, Arne
Esser, Michael
Schäfer, Jürgen
Afat, Saif
Tsiflikas, Ilias
AI Denoising Improves Image Quality and Radiological Workflows in Pediatric Ultra-Low-Dose Thorax Computed Tomography Scans
title AI Denoising Improves Image Quality and Radiological Workflows in Pediatric Ultra-Low-Dose Thorax Computed Tomography Scans
title_full AI Denoising Improves Image Quality and Radiological Workflows in Pediatric Ultra-Low-Dose Thorax Computed Tomography Scans
title_fullStr AI Denoising Improves Image Quality and Radiological Workflows in Pediatric Ultra-Low-Dose Thorax Computed Tomography Scans
title_full_unstemmed AI Denoising Improves Image Quality and Radiological Workflows in Pediatric Ultra-Low-Dose Thorax Computed Tomography Scans
title_short AI Denoising Improves Image Quality and Radiological Workflows in Pediatric Ultra-Low-Dose Thorax Computed Tomography Scans
title_sort ai denoising improves image quality and radiological workflows in pediatric ultra-low-dose thorax computed tomography scans
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9326759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35894005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8040140
work_keys_str_mv AT brendlinandreass aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT schmidulrich aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT plajerdavid aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT chaikamaryanna aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT madermarkus aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT wrazidlorobin aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT mannlinsimon aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT spogisjakob aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT estlerarne aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT essermichael aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT schaferjurgen aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT afatsaif aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans
AT tsiflikasilias aidenoisingimprovesimagequalityandradiologicalworkflowsinpediatricultralowdosethoraxcomputedtomographyscans