Cargando…

Colon Sparing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Advanced Colorectal Lesions: Is It Time for Global Adoption?

The majority of colon lesions are <10 mm in size and are easily resected by endoscopists with appropriate basic training. Lesions ≥10 mm in size are difficult to remove technically and are associated with higher rates of incomplete resection. Currently, the main endoscopic approaches include endo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Zhong-Wei, Ding, Chao-Hui, Song, Yao-Dong, Cui, Zong-Chao, Bi, Xiu-Qian, Cheng, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35912240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.967100
_version_ 1784757434885079040
author Wu, Zhong-Wei
Ding, Chao-Hui
Song, Yao-Dong
Cui, Zong-Chao
Bi, Xiu-Qian
Cheng, Bo
author_facet Wu, Zhong-Wei
Ding, Chao-Hui
Song, Yao-Dong
Cui, Zong-Chao
Bi, Xiu-Qian
Cheng, Bo
author_sort Wu, Zhong-Wei
collection PubMed
description The majority of colon lesions are <10 mm in size and are easily resected by endoscopists with appropriate basic training. Lesions ≥10 mm in size are difficult to remove technically and are associated with higher rates of incomplete resection. Currently, the main endoscopic approaches include endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for lesions without submucosal invasion, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for relatively larger lesions involving the superficial submucosal layer. Both of these approaches have limitations, EMR cannot reliably ensure complete resection for larger tumors and recurrence is a key limitation. ESD reliably provides complete resection and an accurate pathological diagnosis but is associated with risk such as perforation or bleeding. In addition, both EMR and ESD may be ineffective in treating subepithelial lesions that extend beyond the submucosa. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging innovative endoscopic therapy which was developed to overcome the limitations of EMR and ESD. Advantages include enabling a transmural resection, complete resection of complex colorectal lesions involving the mucosa to the muscularis propria. Recent studies comparing EFTR with current resection techniques and radical surgery for relatively complicated and larger lesion have provided promising results. If the current trajectory of research and development is maintained, EFTR will likely to become a strong contender as an alternative standard of care for advanced colonic lesions. In the current study we aimed to address this need, and highlighted the areas of future research, while stressing the need for multinational collaboration provide the steppingstone(s) needed to bring EFTR to the mainstream.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9327091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93270912022-07-28 Colon Sparing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Advanced Colorectal Lesions: Is It Time for Global Adoption? Wu, Zhong-Wei Ding, Chao-Hui Song, Yao-Dong Cui, Zong-Chao Bi, Xiu-Qian Cheng, Bo Front Oncol Oncology The majority of colon lesions are <10 mm in size and are easily resected by endoscopists with appropriate basic training. Lesions ≥10 mm in size are difficult to remove technically and are associated with higher rates of incomplete resection. Currently, the main endoscopic approaches include endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for lesions without submucosal invasion, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for relatively larger lesions involving the superficial submucosal layer. Both of these approaches have limitations, EMR cannot reliably ensure complete resection for larger tumors and recurrence is a key limitation. ESD reliably provides complete resection and an accurate pathological diagnosis but is associated with risk such as perforation or bleeding. In addition, both EMR and ESD may be ineffective in treating subepithelial lesions that extend beyond the submucosa. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging innovative endoscopic therapy which was developed to overcome the limitations of EMR and ESD. Advantages include enabling a transmural resection, complete resection of complex colorectal lesions involving the mucosa to the muscularis propria. Recent studies comparing EFTR with current resection techniques and radical surgery for relatively complicated and larger lesion have provided promising results. If the current trajectory of research and development is maintained, EFTR will likely to become a strong contender as an alternative standard of care for advanced colonic lesions. In the current study we aimed to address this need, and highlighted the areas of future research, while stressing the need for multinational collaboration provide the steppingstone(s) needed to bring EFTR to the mainstream. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9327091/ /pubmed/35912240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.967100 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wu, Ding, Song, Cui, Bi and Cheng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wu, Zhong-Wei
Ding, Chao-Hui
Song, Yao-Dong
Cui, Zong-Chao
Bi, Xiu-Qian
Cheng, Bo
Colon Sparing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Advanced Colorectal Lesions: Is It Time for Global Adoption?
title Colon Sparing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Advanced Colorectal Lesions: Is It Time for Global Adoption?
title_full Colon Sparing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Advanced Colorectal Lesions: Is It Time for Global Adoption?
title_fullStr Colon Sparing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Advanced Colorectal Lesions: Is It Time for Global Adoption?
title_full_unstemmed Colon Sparing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Advanced Colorectal Lesions: Is It Time for Global Adoption?
title_short Colon Sparing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Advanced Colorectal Lesions: Is It Time for Global Adoption?
title_sort colon sparing endoscopic full-thickness resection for advanced colorectal lesions: is it time for global adoption?
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35912240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.967100
work_keys_str_mv AT wuzhongwei colonsparingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionforadvancedcolorectallesionsisittimeforglobaladoption
AT dingchaohui colonsparingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionforadvancedcolorectallesionsisittimeforglobaladoption
AT songyaodong colonsparingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionforadvancedcolorectallesionsisittimeforglobaladoption
AT cuizongchao colonsparingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionforadvancedcolorectallesionsisittimeforglobaladoption
AT bixiuqian colonsparingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionforadvancedcolorectallesionsisittimeforglobaladoption
AT chengbo colonsparingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionforadvancedcolorectallesionsisittimeforglobaladoption