Cargando…

Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a CENTER-TBI study

BACKGROUND: While the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) is one of the strongest outcome predictors, the current classification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as ‘mild’, ‘moderate’ or ‘severe’ based on this fails to capture enormous heterogeneity in pathophysiology and treatment response. We hypothesized tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Åkerlund, Cecilia A. I., Holst, Anders, Stocchetti, Nino, Steyerberg, Ewout W., Menon, David K., Ercole, Ari, Nelson, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04079-w
_version_ 1784757450520395776
author Åkerlund, Cecilia A. I.
Holst, Anders
Stocchetti, Nino
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Menon, David K.
Ercole, Ari
Nelson, David W.
author_facet Åkerlund, Cecilia A. I.
Holst, Anders
Stocchetti, Nino
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Menon, David K.
Ercole, Ari
Nelson, David W.
author_sort Åkerlund, Cecilia A. I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) is one of the strongest outcome predictors, the current classification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as ‘mild’, ‘moderate’ or ‘severe’ based on this fails to capture enormous heterogeneity in pathophysiology and treatment response. We hypothesized that data-driven characterization of TBI could identify distinct endotypes and give mechanistic insights. METHODS: We developed an unsupervised statistical clustering model based on a mixture of probabilistic graphs for presentation (< 24 h) demographic, clinical, physiological, laboratory and imaging data to identify subgroups of TBI patients admitted to the intensive care unit in the CENTER-TBI dataset (N = 1,728). A cluster similarity index was used for robust determination of optimal cluster number. Mutual information was used to quantify feature importance and for cluster interpretation. RESULTS: Six stable endotypes were identified with distinct GCS and composite systemic metabolic stress profiles, distinguished by GCS, blood lactate, oxygen saturation, serum creatinine, glucose, base excess, pH, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and body temperature. Notably, a cluster with ‘moderate’ TBI (by traditional classification) and deranged metabolic profile, had a worse outcome than a cluster with ‘severe’ GCS and a normal metabolic profile. Addition of cluster labels significantly improved the prognostic precision of the IMPACT (International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical trials in TBI) extended model, for prediction of both unfavourable outcome and mortality (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Six stable and clinically distinct TBI endotypes were identified by probabilistic unsupervised clustering. In addition to presenting neurology, a profile of biochemical derangement was found to be an important distinguishing feature that was both biologically plausible and associated with outcome. Our work motivates refining current TBI classifications with factors describing metabolic stress. Such data-driven clusters suggest TBI endotypes that merit investigation to identify bespoke treatment strategies to improve care. Trial registration The core study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02210221, registered on August 06, 2014, with Resource Identification Portal (RRID: SCR_015582). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04079-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9327174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93271742022-07-28 Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a CENTER-TBI study Åkerlund, Cecilia A. I. Holst, Anders Stocchetti, Nino Steyerberg, Ewout W. Menon, David K. Ercole, Ari Nelson, David W. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: While the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) is one of the strongest outcome predictors, the current classification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as ‘mild’, ‘moderate’ or ‘severe’ based on this fails to capture enormous heterogeneity in pathophysiology and treatment response. We hypothesized that data-driven characterization of TBI could identify distinct endotypes and give mechanistic insights. METHODS: We developed an unsupervised statistical clustering model based on a mixture of probabilistic graphs for presentation (< 24 h) demographic, clinical, physiological, laboratory and imaging data to identify subgroups of TBI patients admitted to the intensive care unit in the CENTER-TBI dataset (N = 1,728). A cluster similarity index was used for robust determination of optimal cluster number. Mutual information was used to quantify feature importance and for cluster interpretation. RESULTS: Six stable endotypes were identified with distinct GCS and composite systemic metabolic stress profiles, distinguished by GCS, blood lactate, oxygen saturation, serum creatinine, glucose, base excess, pH, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and body temperature. Notably, a cluster with ‘moderate’ TBI (by traditional classification) and deranged metabolic profile, had a worse outcome than a cluster with ‘severe’ GCS and a normal metabolic profile. Addition of cluster labels significantly improved the prognostic precision of the IMPACT (International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical trials in TBI) extended model, for prediction of both unfavourable outcome and mortality (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Six stable and clinically distinct TBI endotypes were identified by probabilistic unsupervised clustering. In addition to presenting neurology, a profile of biochemical derangement was found to be an important distinguishing feature that was both biologically plausible and associated with outcome. Our work motivates refining current TBI classifications with factors describing metabolic stress. Such data-driven clusters suggest TBI endotypes that merit investigation to identify bespoke treatment strategies to improve care. Trial registration The core study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02210221, registered on August 06, 2014, with Resource Identification Portal (RRID: SCR_015582). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04079-w. BioMed Central 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9327174/ /pubmed/35897070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04079-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Åkerlund, Cecilia A. I.
Holst, Anders
Stocchetti, Nino
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Menon, David K.
Ercole, Ari
Nelson, David W.
Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a CENTER-TBI study
title Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a CENTER-TBI study
title_full Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a CENTER-TBI study
title_fullStr Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a CENTER-TBI study
title_full_unstemmed Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a CENTER-TBI study
title_short Clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a CENTER-TBI study
title_sort clustering identifies endotypes of traumatic brain injury in an intensive care cohort: a center-tbi study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04079-w
work_keys_str_mv AT akerlundceciliaai clusteringidentifiesendotypesoftraumaticbraininjuryinanintensivecarecohortacentertbistudy
AT holstanders clusteringidentifiesendotypesoftraumaticbraininjuryinanintensivecarecohortacentertbistudy
AT stocchettinino clusteringidentifiesendotypesoftraumaticbraininjuryinanintensivecarecohortacentertbistudy
AT steyerbergewoutw clusteringidentifiesendotypesoftraumaticbraininjuryinanintensivecarecohortacentertbistudy
AT menondavidk clusteringidentifiesendotypesoftraumaticbraininjuryinanintensivecarecohortacentertbistudy
AT ercoleari clusteringidentifiesendotypesoftraumaticbraininjuryinanintensivecarecohortacentertbistudy
AT nelsondavidw clusteringidentifiesendotypesoftraumaticbraininjuryinanintensivecarecohortacentertbistudy
AT clusteringidentifiesendotypesoftraumaticbraininjuryinanintensivecarecohortacentertbistudy