Cargando…

NECK AND BACK PAIN: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PATIENTS TREATED IN PRIMARY AND SPECIALIST HEALTHCARE

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare patients with neck or back pain treated by physiotherapists in primary healthcare (PHC) and in departments for physical medicine and rehabilitation in specialist healthcare (SHC) in Norway. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using data from the FYSIOPRIM (FP) database i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: TYRDAL, Mari Kristine, VEIERØD, Marit B., RØE, Cecilie, NATVIG, Bård, WAHL, Astrid Klopstad, ROBINSON, Hilde Stendal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Journals Sweden AB 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657413
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v54.363
_version_ 1784757453803487232
author TYRDAL, Mari Kristine
VEIERØD, Marit B.
RØE, Cecilie
NATVIG, Bård
WAHL, Astrid Klopstad
ROBINSON, Hilde Stendal
author_facet TYRDAL, Mari Kristine
VEIERØD, Marit B.
RØE, Cecilie
NATVIG, Bård
WAHL, Astrid Klopstad
ROBINSON, Hilde Stendal
author_sort TYRDAL, Mari Kristine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare patients with neck or back pain treated by physiotherapists in primary healthcare (PHC) and in departments for physical medicine and rehabilitation in specialist healthcare (SHC) in Norway. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using data from the FYSIOPRIM (FP) database in PHC and the Norwegian Neck and Back Registry (NPR) in SHC. Neck and back pain patients in the period 2014–18 aged ≥ 18 years were included. Demographics, lifestyle and clinical factors were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 8,125 patients were included: 584 in PHC and 7,541 in SHC. Mean age was 47.1 and 45.5 years, respectively, with more females in PHC (72% vs 56%). Low levels of education and physical activity, high workload and receiving social benefits were associated with treatment in SHC. Treatment in SHC was most common among patients with pain duration 3 to 12 months. Higher pain intensity and lower health-related quality of life were found in patients treated in SHC, no differences were found for psychological distress. CONCLUSION: This is the first study comparing register data in patients with neck or back pain treated in PHC and SHC. Differences were found in pain and health-related quality of life, but levels of psychological distress were similar between patients treated in PHC and those treated in SHC. LAY ABSTRACT Patients with neck or back pain have high levels of healthcare utilization, both in primary and specialist healthcare. The aim of this study was to investigate patients referred and treated by physiotherapists in primary healthcare and by specialists in specialist healthcare in Norway, to evaluate differences in the demographics, lifestyle and clinical factors of patients treated in each healthcare setting. Included patients had been diagnosed with neck or back pain from 2014 to 2018, and were aged ≥18 years. Patients in specialist care had more pain and lower health-related quality of life, but similar levels of psychological distress to those treated in primary healthcare. Furthermore, patients treated in specialist healthcare had lower socioeconomic status (education, workload, social benefits) compared with those treated in primary healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9327188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Medical Journals Sweden AB
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93271882022-07-29 NECK AND BACK PAIN: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PATIENTS TREATED IN PRIMARY AND SPECIALIST HEALTHCARE TYRDAL, Mari Kristine VEIERØD, Marit B. RØE, Cecilie NATVIG, Bård WAHL, Astrid Klopstad ROBINSON, Hilde Stendal J Rehabil Med Original Report OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare patients with neck or back pain treated by physiotherapists in primary healthcare (PHC) and in departments for physical medicine and rehabilitation in specialist healthcare (SHC) in Norway. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using data from the FYSIOPRIM (FP) database in PHC and the Norwegian Neck and Back Registry (NPR) in SHC. Neck and back pain patients in the period 2014–18 aged ≥ 18 years were included. Demographics, lifestyle and clinical factors were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 8,125 patients were included: 584 in PHC and 7,541 in SHC. Mean age was 47.1 and 45.5 years, respectively, with more females in PHC (72% vs 56%). Low levels of education and physical activity, high workload and receiving social benefits were associated with treatment in SHC. Treatment in SHC was most common among patients with pain duration 3 to 12 months. Higher pain intensity and lower health-related quality of life were found in patients treated in SHC, no differences were found for psychological distress. CONCLUSION: This is the first study comparing register data in patients with neck or back pain treated in PHC and SHC. Differences were found in pain and health-related quality of life, but levels of psychological distress were similar between patients treated in PHC and those treated in SHC. LAY ABSTRACT Patients with neck or back pain have high levels of healthcare utilization, both in primary and specialist healthcare. The aim of this study was to investigate patients referred and treated by physiotherapists in primary healthcare and by specialists in specialist healthcare in Norway, to evaluate differences in the demographics, lifestyle and clinical factors of patients treated in each healthcare setting. Included patients had been diagnosed with neck or back pain from 2014 to 2018, and were aged ≥18 years. Patients in specialist care had more pain and lower health-related quality of life, but similar levels of psychological distress to those treated in primary healthcare. Furthermore, patients treated in specialist healthcare had lower socioeconomic status (education, workload, social benefits) compared with those treated in primary healthcare. Medical Journals Sweden AB 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9327188/ /pubmed/35657413 http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v54.363 Text en © Published by Medical Journals Sweden, on behalf of the Foundation for Rehabilitation Information https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Report
TYRDAL, Mari Kristine
VEIERØD, Marit B.
RØE, Cecilie
NATVIG, Bård
WAHL, Astrid Klopstad
ROBINSON, Hilde Stendal
NECK AND BACK PAIN: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PATIENTS TREATED IN PRIMARY AND SPECIALIST HEALTHCARE
title NECK AND BACK PAIN: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PATIENTS TREATED IN PRIMARY AND SPECIALIST HEALTHCARE
title_full NECK AND BACK PAIN: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PATIENTS TREATED IN PRIMARY AND SPECIALIST HEALTHCARE
title_fullStr NECK AND BACK PAIN: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PATIENTS TREATED IN PRIMARY AND SPECIALIST HEALTHCARE
title_full_unstemmed NECK AND BACK PAIN: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PATIENTS TREATED IN PRIMARY AND SPECIALIST HEALTHCARE
title_short NECK AND BACK PAIN: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PATIENTS TREATED IN PRIMARY AND SPECIALIST HEALTHCARE
title_sort neck and back pain: differences between patients treated in primary and specialist healthcare
topic Original Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657413
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v54.363
work_keys_str_mv AT tyrdalmarikristine neckandbackpaindifferencesbetweenpatientstreatedinprimaryandspecialisthealthcare
AT veierødmaritb neckandbackpaindifferencesbetweenpatientstreatedinprimaryandspecialisthealthcare
AT røececilie neckandbackpaindifferencesbetweenpatientstreatedinprimaryandspecialisthealthcare
AT natvigbard neckandbackpaindifferencesbetweenpatientstreatedinprimaryandspecialisthealthcare
AT wahlastridklopstad neckandbackpaindifferencesbetweenpatientstreatedinprimaryandspecialisthealthcare
AT robinsonhildestendal neckandbackpaindifferencesbetweenpatientstreatedinprimaryandspecialisthealthcare