Cargando…

The optimal angle of screw for using cement-screw technique to repair tibial defect in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: The cement-screw technique is a convenient method to repair tibial plateau defects in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal angle of screw insertions is unknown. This study aimed to perform a finite element analysis (FEA) to determine the optimal screw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Guanghui, Yao, Shuxin, Ma, Jianbing, Wang, Jianpeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03251-w
_version_ 1784757494668591104
author Zhao, Guanghui
Yao, Shuxin
Ma, Jianbing
Wang, Jianpeng
author_facet Zhao, Guanghui
Yao, Shuxin
Ma, Jianbing
Wang, Jianpeng
author_sort Zhao, Guanghui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cement-screw technique is a convenient method to repair tibial plateau defects in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal angle of screw insertions is unknown. This study aimed to perform a finite element analysis (FEA) to determine the optimal screw angle for the repair of tibial plateau defects in TKA. METHODS: Seven FEA models were set and two common different defects (defect 1: area < 12%, depth < 12 mm; defect 2: area > 12%, depth > 12 mm) were simulated. One screw was used in defect 1, and one or two screws were used in defect 2. Screws were parallel to the proximal cortical bone (oblique screw) or perpendicular to the upper surface (vertical screw) of the tibia. Contact stresses on cancellous bone in different areas were determined. Maximum principal stress on the cancellous bone around each screw was also compared. RESULTS: The FEA models showed that stresses on the surface of cancellous bone in tibial defect (0.13–0.39 MPa) and stress focus spot (0.45 MPa) around the screw were lower when one vertical screw was used in defect 1. The stresses on the surface of cancellous bone in tibial defect (0.09–0.44 MPa), stresses in the medial tibial plateau (0.14–0.21 MPa), and stress focus spot around the screws were lowest (0.42 MPa and 1.37 MPa) when two vertical screws were used in defect 2, followed by of one vertical and one oblique (0.16–0.48 MPa; 0.15–0.21 MPa; 1.63 MPa and 1.11 MPa). No other statistically significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Either for one or two screws, those perpendicular to the upper surface achieve better stability than those parallel to the proximal cortical bone of the tibia. If two vertical screws cannot be performed, one vertical and one oblique is also acceptable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9327380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93273802022-07-28 The optimal angle of screw for using cement-screw technique to repair tibial defect in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis Zhao, Guanghui Yao, Shuxin Ma, Jianbing Wang, Jianpeng J Orthop Surg Res Research BACKGROUND: The cement-screw technique is a convenient method to repair tibial plateau defects in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal angle of screw insertions is unknown. This study aimed to perform a finite element analysis (FEA) to determine the optimal screw angle for the repair of tibial plateau defects in TKA. METHODS: Seven FEA models were set and two common different defects (defect 1: area < 12%, depth < 12 mm; defect 2: area > 12%, depth > 12 mm) were simulated. One screw was used in defect 1, and one or two screws were used in defect 2. Screws were parallel to the proximal cortical bone (oblique screw) or perpendicular to the upper surface (vertical screw) of the tibia. Contact stresses on cancellous bone in different areas were determined. Maximum principal stress on the cancellous bone around each screw was also compared. RESULTS: The FEA models showed that stresses on the surface of cancellous bone in tibial defect (0.13–0.39 MPa) and stress focus spot (0.45 MPa) around the screw were lower when one vertical screw was used in defect 1. The stresses on the surface of cancellous bone in tibial defect (0.09–0.44 MPa), stresses in the medial tibial plateau (0.14–0.21 MPa), and stress focus spot around the screws were lowest (0.42 MPa and 1.37 MPa) when two vertical screws were used in defect 2, followed by of one vertical and one oblique (0.16–0.48 MPa; 0.15–0.21 MPa; 1.63 MPa and 1.11 MPa). No other statistically significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Either for one or two screws, those perpendicular to the upper surface achieve better stability than those parallel to the proximal cortical bone of the tibia. If two vertical screws cannot be performed, one vertical and one oblique is also acceptable. BioMed Central 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9327380/ /pubmed/35883149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03251-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Guanghui
Yao, Shuxin
Ma, Jianbing
Wang, Jianpeng
The optimal angle of screw for using cement-screw technique to repair tibial defect in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title The optimal angle of screw for using cement-screw technique to repair tibial defect in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title_full The optimal angle of screw for using cement-screw technique to repair tibial defect in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr The optimal angle of screw for using cement-screw technique to repair tibial defect in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed The optimal angle of screw for using cement-screw technique to repair tibial defect in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title_short The optimal angle of screw for using cement-screw technique to repair tibial defect in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
title_sort optimal angle of screw for using cement-screw technique to repair tibial defect in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35883149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03251-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoguanghui theoptimalangleofscrewforusingcementscrewtechniquetorepairtibialdefectintotalkneearthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT yaoshuxin theoptimalangleofscrewforusingcementscrewtechniquetorepairtibialdefectintotalkneearthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT majianbing theoptimalangleofscrewforusingcementscrewtechniquetorepairtibialdefectintotalkneearthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT wangjianpeng theoptimalangleofscrewforusingcementscrewtechniquetorepairtibialdefectintotalkneearthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhaoguanghui optimalangleofscrewforusingcementscrewtechniquetorepairtibialdefectintotalkneearthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT yaoshuxin optimalangleofscrewforusingcementscrewtechniquetorepairtibialdefectintotalkneearthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT majianbing optimalangleofscrewforusingcementscrewtechniquetorepairtibialdefectintotalkneearthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis
AT wangjianpeng optimalangleofscrewforusingcementscrewtechniquetorepairtibialdefectintotalkneearthroplastyafiniteelementanalysis