Cargando…

Proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements enhance ability to predict ex vivo drug response in AML

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) affects 20,000 patients in the US annually with a five-year survival rate of approximately 25%. One reason for the low survival rate is the high prevalence of clonal evolution that gives rise to heterogeneous sub-populations of leukemic cells with diverse mutation spectr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gosline, Sara J. C., Tognon, Cristina, Nestor, Michael, Joshi, Sunil, Modak, Rucha, Damnernsawad, Alisa, Posso, Camilo, Moon, Jamie, Hansen, Joshua R., Hutchinson-Bunch, Chelsea, Pino, James C., Gritsenko, Marina A., Weitz, Karl K., Traer, Elie, Tyner, Jeffrey, Druker, Brian, Agarwal, Anupriya, Piehowski, Paul, McDermott, Jason E., Rodland, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35896960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12014-022-09367-9
_version_ 1784757503402180608
author Gosline, Sara J. C.
Tognon, Cristina
Nestor, Michael
Joshi, Sunil
Modak, Rucha
Damnernsawad, Alisa
Posso, Camilo
Moon, Jamie
Hansen, Joshua R.
Hutchinson-Bunch, Chelsea
Pino, James C.
Gritsenko, Marina A.
Weitz, Karl K.
Traer, Elie
Tyner, Jeffrey
Druker, Brian
Agarwal, Anupriya
Piehowski, Paul
McDermott, Jason E.
Rodland, Karin
author_facet Gosline, Sara J. C.
Tognon, Cristina
Nestor, Michael
Joshi, Sunil
Modak, Rucha
Damnernsawad, Alisa
Posso, Camilo
Moon, Jamie
Hansen, Joshua R.
Hutchinson-Bunch, Chelsea
Pino, James C.
Gritsenko, Marina A.
Weitz, Karl K.
Traer, Elie
Tyner, Jeffrey
Druker, Brian
Agarwal, Anupriya
Piehowski, Paul
McDermott, Jason E.
Rodland, Karin
author_sort Gosline, Sara J. C.
collection PubMed
description Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) affects 20,000 patients in the US annually with a five-year survival rate of approximately 25%. One reason for the low survival rate is the high prevalence of clonal evolution that gives rise to heterogeneous sub-populations of leukemic cells with diverse mutation spectra, which eventually leads to disease relapse. This genetic heterogeneity drives the activation of complex signaling pathways that is reflected at the protein level. This diversity makes it difficult to treat AML with targeted therapy, requiring custom patient treatment protocols tailored to each individual’s leukemia. Toward this end, the Beat AML research program prospectively collected genomic and transcriptomic data from over 1000 AML patients and carried out ex vivo drug sensitivity assays to identify genomic signatures that could predict patient-specific drug responses. However, there are inherent weaknesses in using only genetic and transcriptomic measurements as surrogates of drug response, particularly the absence of direct information about phosphorylation-mediated signal transduction. As a member of the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium, we have extended the molecular characterization of this cohort by collecting proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements from a subset of these patient samples (38 in total) to evaluate the hypothesis that proteomic signatures can improve the ability to predict response to 26 drugs in AML ex vivo samples. In this work we describe our systematic, multi-omic approach to evaluate proteomic signatures of drug response and compare protein levels to other markers of drug response such as mutational patterns. We explore the nuances of this approach using two drugs that target key pathways activated in AML: quizartinib (FLT3) and trametinib (Ras/MEK), and show how patient-derived signatures can be interpreted biologically and validated in cell lines. In conclusion, this pilot study demonstrates strong promise for proteomics-based patient stratification to assess drug sensitivity in AML. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12014-022-09367-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9327422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93274222022-07-28 Proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements enhance ability to predict ex vivo drug response in AML Gosline, Sara J. C. Tognon, Cristina Nestor, Michael Joshi, Sunil Modak, Rucha Damnernsawad, Alisa Posso, Camilo Moon, Jamie Hansen, Joshua R. Hutchinson-Bunch, Chelsea Pino, James C. Gritsenko, Marina A. Weitz, Karl K. Traer, Elie Tyner, Jeffrey Druker, Brian Agarwal, Anupriya Piehowski, Paul McDermott, Jason E. Rodland, Karin Clin Proteomics Research Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) affects 20,000 patients in the US annually with a five-year survival rate of approximately 25%. One reason for the low survival rate is the high prevalence of clonal evolution that gives rise to heterogeneous sub-populations of leukemic cells with diverse mutation spectra, which eventually leads to disease relapse. This genetic heterogeneity drives the activation of complex signaling pathways that is reflected at the protein level. This diversity makes it difficult to treat AML with targeted therapy, requiring custom patient treatment protocols tailored to each individual’s leukemia. Toward this end, the Beat AML research program prospectively collected genomic and transcriptomic data from over 1000 AML patients and carried out ex vivo drug sensitivity assays to identify genomic signatures that could predict patient-specific drug responses. However, there are inherent weaknesses in using only genetic and transcriptomic measurements as surrogates of drug response, particularly the absence of direct information about phosphorylation-mediated signal transduction. As a member of the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium, we have extended the molecular characterization of this cohort by collecting proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements from a subset of these patient samples (38 in total) to evaluate the hypothesis that proteomic signatures can improve the ability to predict response to 26 drugs in AML ex vivo samples. In this work we describe our systematic, multi-omic approach to evaluate proteomic signatures of drug response and compare protein levels to other markers of drug response such as mutational patterns. We explore the nuances of this approach using two drugs that target key pathways activated in AML: quizartinib (FLT3) and trametinib (Ras/MEK), and show how patient-derived signatures can be interpreted biologically and validated in cell lines. In conclusion, this pilot study demonstrates strong promise for proteomics-based patient stratification to assess drug sensitivity in AML. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12014-022-09367-9. BioMed Central 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9327422/ /pubmed/35896960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12014-022-09367-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gosline, Sara J. C.
Tognon, Cristina
Nestor, Michael
Joshi, Sunil
Modak, Rucha
Damnernsawad, Alisa
Posso, Camilo
Moon, Jamie
Hansen, Joshua R.
Hutchinson-Bunch, Chelsea
Pino, James C.
Gritsenko, Marina A.
Weitz, Karl K.
Traer, Elie
Tyner, Jeffrey
Druker, Brian
Agarwal, Anupriya
Piehowski, Paul
McDermott, Jason E.
Rodland, Karin
Proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements enhance ability to predict ex vivo drug response in AML
title Proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements enhance ability to predict ex vivo drug response in AML
title_full Proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements enhance ability to predict ex vivo drug response in AML
title_fullStr Proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements enhance ability to predict ex vivo drug response in AML
title_full_unstemmed Proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements enhance ability to predict ex vivo drug response in AML
title_short Proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements enhance ability to predict ex vivo drug response in AML
title_sort proteomic and phosphoproteomic measurements enhance ability to predict ex vivo drug response in aml
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35896960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12014-022-09367-9
work_keys_str_mv AT goslinesarajc proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT tognoncristina proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT nestormichael proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT joshisunil proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT modakrucha proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT damnernsawadalisa proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT possocamilo proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT moonjamie proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT hansenjoshuar proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT hutchinsonbunchchelsea proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT pinojamesc proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT gritsenkomarinaa proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT weitzkarlk proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT traerelie proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT tynerjeffrey proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT drukerbrian proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT agarwalanupriya proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT piehowskipaul proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT mcdermottjasone proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml
AT rodlandkarin proteomicandphosphoproteomicmeasurementsenhanceabilitytopredictexvivodrugresponseinaml