Cargando…

Use of Daily Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Pediatric Cancer Care

IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are emerging as an important component of adult cancer care, but little has been done with regard to PROMs for pediatric cancer care. OBJECTIVES: To identify pediatric patients with cancer who are at risk of severe adverse effects of treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meryk, Andreas, Kropshofer, Gabriele, Hetzer, Benjamin, Riedl, David, Lehmann, Jens, Rumpold, Gerhard, Haid, Alexandra, Schneeberger-Carta, Verena, Holzner, Bernhard, Crazzolara, Roman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23701
Descripción
Sumario:IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are emerging as an important component of adult cancer care, but little has been done with regard to PROMs for pediatric cancer care. OBJECTIVES: To identify pediatric patients with cancer who are at risk of severe adverse effects of treatment and provide individualized supportive care using PROMs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-center cohort study with PROMs implemented in daily clinical routine was conducted from May 1, 2020, to November 15, 2021, among pediatric patients with a cancer diagnosis or their proxies. Inclusion criteria were treatment with chemotherapy and at least 30 days of active participation. Patients were followed up until completion of therapy or through ongoing therapy until November 15, 2021; data were analyzed from November 15, 2021, through January 31, 2022. EXPOSURES: Cancer treatment, including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was occurrence and severity of ubiquitous complications of cancer treatment, such as nausea, appetite loss, pain, sleep disturbance, and deterioration of physical functioning. The secondary outcome was the identification of early and appropriate clinical interventions based on detection of cancer-related symptoms via PROMs. RESULTS: A total of 4410 daily PROMs from 7082 therapy days for 40 children (35 children aged 5-18 years and 5 proxies for children aged 1-4 years) (median age, 9.1 [IQR, 6.3-12.2] years; 26 [65.0%] male) were analyzed during a median follow-up of 145.5 (IQR, 103.8-244.5) days. All participants were White. The overall median completion rate was 60.1% (IQR, 37.9%-81.0%); this rate was slightly lower during home care vs inpatient stay (57.5% [IQR, 30.7%-85.9%] vs 65.0% [IQR, 49.6%-92.5%], respectively; P = .01), with a decreasing trend over time (65.6% [IQR, 51.6%-85.9%] for the first 90 days vs 42.9% [IQR, 29.3%-82.3%] for beyond 90 days; P < .001). Severe symptoms were reported on 657 days (14.9%); most symptoms were associated with physical functioning, followed by pain, sleep disturbance, and nausea and appetite loss. In total, 321 adverse events (AEs) and cases of health deterioration were documented, and PROMs were completed for 251 (78.2%) of these events. Across all AEs, self-reported pain was the most useful marker, particularly when analyzed on the day before onset, and was associated with an odds ratio of 3.65 (95% CI, 1.54-8.62; P = .005) for the presence of mucositis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this cohort study suggest that PROMs reflect daily symptoms in pediatric patients with cancer and assist in clinical management and intervention for AEs.