Cargando…
Population‐based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a population‐based screening trial using prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), a kallikrein panel and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) aimed at minimizing overdiagnosis, while retaining mortality benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Feasibility of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34958531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15683 |
_version_ | 1784757541055496192 |
---|---|
author | Rannikko, Antti Leht, Mare Mirtti, Tuomas Kenttämies, Anu Tolonen, Teemu Rinta‐Kiikka, Irina Kilpeläinen, Tuomas P. Natunen, Kari Lilja, Hans Lehtimäki, Terho Raitanen, Jani Kujala, Paula Ronkainen, Johanna Matikainen, Mika Petas, Anssi Taari, Kimmo Tammela, Teuvo Auvinen, Anssi |
author_facet | Rannikko, Antti Leht, Mare Mirtti, Tuomas Kenttämies, Anu Tolonen, Teemu Rinta‐Kiikka, Irina Kilpeläinen, Tuomas P. Natunen, Kari Lilja, Hans Lehtimäki, Terho Raitanen, Jani Kujala, Paula Ronkainen, Johanna Matikainen, Mika Petas, Anssi Taari, Kimmo Tammela, Teuvo Auvinen, Anssi |
author_sort | Rannikko, Antti |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a population‐based screening trial using prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), a kallikrein panel and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) aimed at minimizing overdiagnosis, while retaining mortality benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Feasibility of the screening algorithm was evaluated in terms of participation, screening test results and cancer detection. A random sample of 400 men aged 65 years was identified from the population registry and invited for screening with three stepwise tests (PSA, kallikrein panel and MRI). Men with PSA levels ≥3 ng/mL were further tested with the kallikrein panel, and those with positive findings (risk >7.5%) were referred for prostate MRI. Men with positive MRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI‐RADS] score 3–5) had targeted biopsies only. Men with negative MRI, but PSA density ≥0.15 underwent systematic biopsies. RESULTS: Of the 399 men invited, 158 (40%) participated and 27 had PSA levels ≥3 ng/mL (7% of the invited and 17% of the participants). Of these, 22 had a positive kallikrein panel (6% of the invited and 81% of the PSA‐positive men). Finally, 10 men (3% of the invited and 45% of 4Kscore [kallikrein panel]‐positive) had a suspicious MRI finding (PI‐RADS score ≥3) and five were diagnosed with a clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group [GG] ≥2) at fusion biopsy (3% of the participants), with two GG 1 cases (1%). Additional testing (kallikrein panel and MRI) after PSA reduced biopsies by 56%. CONCLUSION: The findings constitute proof of principle for our screening protocol, as we achieved a substantial detection rate for clinically significant cancer with few clinically insignificant cases. Participation, however, was suboptimal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9327584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93275842022-10-14 Population‐based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study Rannikko, Antti Leht, Mare Mirtti, Tuomas Kenttämies, Anu Tolonen, Teemu Rinta‐Kiikka, Irina Kilpeläinen, Tuomas P. Natunen, Kari Lilja, Hans Lehtimäki, Terho Raitanen, Jani Kujala, Paula Ronkainen, Johanna Matikainen, Mika Petas, Anssi Taari, Kimmo Tammela, Teuvo Auvinen, Anssi BJU Int Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a population‐based screening trial using prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), a kallikrein panel and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) aimed at minimizing overdiagnosis, while retaining mortality benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Feasibility of the screening algorithm was evaluated in terms of participation, screening test results and cancer detection. A random sample of 400 men aged 65 years was identified from the population registry and invited for screening with three stepwise tests (PSA, kallikrein panel and MRI). Men with PSA levels ≥3 ng/mL were further tested with the kallikrein panel, and those with positive findings (risk >7.5%) were referred for prostate MRI. Men with positive MRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI‐RADS] score 3–5) had targeted biopsies only. Men with negative MRI, but PSA density ≥0.15 underwent systematic biopsies. RESULTS: Of the 399 men invited, 158 (40%) participated and 27 had PSA levels ≥3 ng/mL (7% of the invited and 17% of the participants). Of these, 22 had a positive kallikrein panel (6% of the invited and 81% of the PSA‐positive men). Finally, 10 men (3% of the invited and 45% of 4Kscore [kallikrein panel]‐positive) had a suspicious MRI finding (PI‐RADS score ≥3) and five were diagnosed with a clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group [GG] ≥2) at fusion biopsy (3% of the participants), with two GG 1 cases (1%). Additional testing (kallikrein panel and MRI) after PSA reduced biopsies by 56%. CONCLUSION: The findings constitute proof of principle for our screening protocol, as we achieved a substantial detection rate for clinically significant cancer with few clinically insignificant cases. Participation, however, was suboptimal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-08 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9327584/ /pubmed/34958531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15683 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rannikko, Antti Leht, Mare Mirtti, Tuomas Kenttämies, Anu Tolonen, Teemu Rinta‐Kiikka, Irina Kilpeläinen, Tuomas P. Natunen, Kari Lilja, Hans Lehtimäki, Terho Raitanen, Jani Kujala, Paula Ronkainen, Johanna Matikainen, Mika Petas, Anssi Taari, Kimmo Tammela, Teuvo Auvinen, Anssi Population‐based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study |
title | Population‐based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study |
title_full | Population‐based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Population‐based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Population‐based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study |
title_short | Population‐based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study |
title_sort | population‐based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer proscreen: a pilot study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34958531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rannikkoantti populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT lehtmare populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT mirttituomas populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT kenttamiesanu populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT tolonenteemu populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT rintakiikkairina populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT kilpelainentuomasp populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT natunenkari populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT liljahans populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT lehtimakiterho populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT raitanenjani populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT kujalapaula populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT ronkainenjohanna populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT matikainenmika populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT petasanssi populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT taarikimmo populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT tammelateuvo populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy AT auvinenanssi populationbasedrandomizedtrialofscreeningforclinicallysignificantprostatecancerproscreenapilotstudy |