Cargando…

Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes

BACKGROUND: It is important to involve older people in evaluating public programmes that affect their lives. This includes those with physical and cognitive impairments (such as dementia) who may need support to live at home. Many countries have implemented new approaches to support older people to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillipson, Lyn, Towers, Ann‐Marie, Caiels, James, Smith, Louisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35441484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13484
_version_ 1784757582418673664
author Phillipson, Lyn
Towers, Ann‐Marie
Caiels, James
Smith, Louisa
author_facet Phillipson, Lyn
Towers, Ann‐Marie
Caiels, James
Smith, Louisa
author_sort Phillipson, Lyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is important to involve older people in evaluating public programmes that affect their lives. This includes those with physical and cognitive impairments (such as dementia) who may need support to live at home. Many countries have implemented new approaches to support older people to live well at home for longer. However, it can be challenging to involve disabled people in service evaluation, so we are unclear whether services are meeting their needs. AIM: This study explored how a cascading methodology, offering different supports enabled the involvement of home care users with cognitive and physical impairments in the assessment of their care‐related quality of life. METHOD: We used multiple tools from the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) with n = 63 older adults who were recipients of home care in the Illawarra. We also offered different physical and cognitive supports as needed. RESULTS: We started with the standard ASCOT questionnaire to assess the care‐related quality of life, but then offered alternative formats (including Easy Read) and supports (including physical and cognitive assistance) if the older person needed them to participate. This allowed us to involve a greater diversity of older people in the evaluation, and changed what we found out about whether their care needs were being met. CONCLUSION: There is a need to implement more flexible and inclusive methods to increase the involvement of vulnerable users of long‐term care in the assessment of service outcomes. This is important to ensure that the perspectives of all service users inform the delivery of person‐centred care. It is also critical to understand the extent to which programmes are meeting the needs of vulnerable service users. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Service users with dementia were involved in the design of the ‘Easy Read’ questionnaire used in the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9327817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93278172022-08-01 Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes Phillipson, Lyn Towers, Ann‐Marie Caiels, James Smith, Louisa Health Expect Original Articles BACKGROUND: It is important to involve older people in evaluating public programmes that affect their lives. This includes those with physical and cognitive impairments (such as dementia) who may need support to live at home. Many countries have implemented new approaches to support older people to live well at home for longer. However, it can be challenging to involve disabled people in service evaluation, so we are unclear whether services are meeting their needs. AIM: This study explored how a cascading methodology, offering different supports enabled the involvement of home care users with cognitive and physical impairments in the assessment of their care‐related quality of life. METHOD: We used multiple tools from the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) with n = 63 older adults who were recipients of home care in the Illawarra. We also offered different physical and cognitive supports as needed. RESULTS: We started with the standard ASCOT questionnaire to assess the care‐related quality of life, but then offered alternative formats (including Easy Read) and supports (including physical and cognitive assistance) if the older person needed them to participate. This allowed us to involve a greater diversity of older people in the evaluation, and changed what we found out about whether their care needs were being met. CONCLUSION: There is a need to implement more flexible and inclusive methods to increase the involvement of vulnerable users of long‐term care in the assessment of service outcomes. This is important to ensure that the perspectives of all service users inform the delivery of person‐centred care. It is also critical to understand the extent to which programmes are meeting the needs of vulnerable service users. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Service users with dementia were involved in the design of the ‘Easy Read’ questionnaire used in the study. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-19 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9327817/ /pubmed/35441484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13484 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Phillipson, Lyn
Towers, Ann‐Marie
Caiels, James
Smith, Louisa
Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes
title Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes
title_full Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes
title_fullStr Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes
title_full_unstemmed Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes
title_short Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes
title_sort supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long‐term care at home programmes
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35441484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13484
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsonlyn supportingtheinvolvementofolderadultswithcomplexneedsinevaluationofoutcomesinlongtermcareathomeprogrammes
AT towersannmarie supportingtheinvolvementofolderadultswithcomplexneedsinevaluationofoutcomesinlongtermcareathomeprogrammes
AT caielsjames supportingtheinvolvementofolderadultswithcomplexneedsinevaluationofoutcomesinlongtermcareathomeprogrammes
AT smithlouisa supportingtheinvolvementofolderadultswithcomplexneedsinevaluationofoutcomesinlongtermcareathomeprogrammes