Cargando…

Assessing the Extent of Environmental Risks From Nickel in European Freshwaters: A Critical Reflection of the European Commission's Current Approach

Nickel (Ni) has a been a Priority Substance under the European Water Framework Directive since 2008. As such it is deemed to present an European Union‐wide risk to surface waters. Since 2013, the Ni Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) has been bioavailability‐based, and new European Guidance suppor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Adam, Wilson, Iain, Merrington, Graham, Schlekat, Christian, Middleton, Ellie, Garman, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5352
_version_ 1784757646786560000
author Peters, Adam
Wilson, Iain
Merrington, Graham
Schlekat, Christian
Middleton, Ellie
Garman, Emily
author_facet Peters, Adam
Wilson, Iain
Merrington, Graham
Schlekat, Christian
Middleton, Ellie
Garman, Emily
author_sort Peters, Adam
collection PubMed
description Nickel (Ni) has a been a Priority Substance under the European Water Framework Directive since 2008. As such it is deemed to present an European Union‐wide risk to surface waters. Since 2013, the Ni Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) has been bioavailability‐based, and new European Guidance supports accounting for bioavailability in assessing Ni compliance with the EQS. The European Commission has developed an approach to determine whether Priority Substances present a sufficient European Union‐wide risk to justify an ongoing statutory monitoring programme, effectively to deselect a substance. This is a key step to ensure that finite monitoring resources are targeted at delivering environmental benefit, when there is an ever‐growing burden of determinands to measure for all regulators. When the European Commission performed this exercise for Ni without accounting for bioavailability, they concluded that Ni should not be deselected, and Ni is an European Union‐wide risk. Performing this same exercise with the same methodology, using regulatory monitoring data for over 300 000 samples, from more than 19 000 sites across Europe, and accounting for bioavailability, as detailed in the Directive, >99% of sites comply with the Ni EQS. Nickel shows very low risks for all of the criteria identified by the European Commission that need to be met for deselection. Accounting for bioavailability is key in the assessment of Ni risks in surface waters to deliver ecologically relevant outcomes. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:1604–1612. © 2022 NiPERA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9328137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93281372022-07-30 Assessing the Extent of Environmental Risks From Nickel in European Freshwaters: A Critical Reflection of the European Commission's Current Approach Peters, Adam Wilson, Iain Merrington, Graham Schlekat, Christian Middleton, Ellie Garman, Emily Environ Toxicol Chem Critical Perspectives Nickel (Ni) has a been a Priority Substance under the European Water Framework Directive since 2008. As such it is deemed to present an European Union‐wide risk to surface waters. Since 2013, the Ni Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) has been bioavailability‐based, and new European Guidance supports accounting for bioavailability in assessing Ni compliance with the EQS. The European Commission has developed an approach to determine whether Priority Substances present a sufficient European Union‐wide risk to justify an ongoing statutory monitoring programme, effectively to deselect a substance. This is a key step to ensure that finite monitoring resources are targeted at delivering environmental benefit, when there is an ever‐growing burden of determinands to measure for all regulators. When the European Commission performed this exercise for Ni without accounting for bioavailability, they concluded that Ni should not be deselected, and Ni is an European Union‐wide risk. Performing this same exercise with the same methodology, using regulatory monitoring data for over 300 000 samples, from more than 19 000 sites across Europe, and accounting for bioavailability, as detailed in the Directive, >99% of sites comply with the Ni EQS. Nickel shows very low risks for all of the criteria identified by the European Commission that need to be met for deselection. Accounting for bioavailability is key in the assessment of Ni risks in surface waters to deliver ecologically relevant outcomes. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:1604–1612. © 2022 NiPERA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-05 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9328137/ /pubmed/35502980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5352 Text en © 2022 NiPERA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Critical Perspectives
Peters, Adam
Wilson, Iain
Merrington, Graham
Schlekat, Christian
Middleton, Ellie
Garman, Emily
Assessing the Extent of Environmental Risks From Nickel in European Freshwaters: A Critical Reflection of the European Commission's Current Approach
title Assessing the Extent of Environmental Risks From Nickel in European Freshwaters: A Critical Reflection of the European Commission's Current Approach
title_full Assessing the Extent of Environmental Risks From Nickel in European Freshwaters: A Critical Reflection of the European Commission's Current Approach
title_fullStr Assessing the Extent of Environmental Risks From Nickel in European Freshwaters: A Critical Reflection of the European Commission's Current Approach
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Extent of Environmental Risks From Nickel in European Freshwaters: A Critical Reflection of the European Commission's Current Approach
title_short Assessing the Extent of Environmental Risks From Nickel in European Freshwaters: A Critical Reflection of the European Commission's Current Approach
title_sort assessing the extent of environmental risks from nickel in european freshwaters: a critical reflection of the european commission's current approach
topic Critical Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35502980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5352
work_keys_str_mv AT petersadam assessingtheextentofenvironmentalrisksfromnickelineuropeanfreshwatersacriticalreflectionoftheeuropeancommissionscurrentapproach
AT wilsoniain assessingtheextentofenvironmentalrisksfromnickelineuropeanfreshwatersacriticalreflectionoftheeuropeancommissionscurrentapproach
AT merringtongraham assessingtheextentofenvironmentalrisksfromnickelineuropeanfreshwatersacriticalreflectionoftheeuropeancommissionscurrentapproach
AT schlekatchristian assessingtheextentofenvironmentalrisksfromnickelineuropeanfreshwatersacriticalreflectionoftheeuropeancommissionscurrentapproach
AT middletonellie assessingtheextentofenvironmentalrisksfromnickelineuropeanfreshwatersacriticalreflectionoftheeuropeancommissionscurrentapproach
AT garmanemily assessingtheextentofenvironmentalrisksfromnickelineuropeanfreshwatersacriticalreflectionoftheeuropeancommissionscurrentapproach