Cargando…

Comparison of postmortem whole‐body contrast‐enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses

OBJECTIVE: Although fetal autopsy is generally recommended to confirm or refute the antemortem diagnosis, parental acceptance of the procedure has fallen over time, mainly due to its invasiveness. Contrast‐enhanced microfocus CT (micro‐CT) and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging (HF‐MRI, ≥ 3 Tesla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dawood, Y., Honhoff, C., van der Post, A.‐S., Roosendaal, S. D., Coolen, B. F., Strijkers, G. J., Pajkrt, E., de Bakker, B. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34826157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.24827
_version_ 1784757649835819008
author Dawood, Y.
Honhoff, C.
van der Post, A.‐S.
Roosendaal, S. D.
Coolen, B. F.
Strijkers, G. J.
Pajkrt, E.
de Bakker, B. S.
author_facet Dawood, Y.
Honhoff, C.
van der Post, A.‐S.
Roosendaal, S. D.
Coolen, B. F.
Strijkers, G. J.
Pajkrt, E.
de Bakker, B. S.
author_sort Dawood, Y.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Although fetal autopsy is generally recommended to confirm or refute the antemortem diagnosis, parental acceptance of the procedure has fallen over time, mainly due to its invasiveness. Contrast‐enhanced microfocus CT (micro‐CT) and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging (HF‐MRI, ≥ 3 Tesla) have both been suggested as non‐invasive alternatives to conventional fetal autopsy for fetuses < 20 weeks of gestation. The aim of this study was to compare these two modalities in postmortem whole‐body fetal imaging. METHODS: In this study, the imaging process and quality of micro‐CT and HF‐MRI were compared using both qualitative and quantitative assessments. For the qualitative evaluation, fetal anatomy experts scored 56 HF‐MRI and 56 micro‐CT images of four human fetuses aged 13–18 gestational weeks on two components: overall image quality and the ability to recognize and assess 21 anatomical structures. For the quantitative evaluation, participants segmented manually three organs with increasing complexity to assess interobserver variability. In addition, the signal‐to‐noise and contrast‐to‐noise ratios of five major organs were determined. RESULTS: Both imaging techniques were able to reach submillimeter voxel size. The highest resolution of micro‐CT was 22 µm (isotropic), while the highest resolution of HF‐MRI was 137 µm (isotropic). The qualitative image assessment form was sent to 45 fetal anatomy experts, of whom 36 (80%) responded. It was observed that micro‐CT scored higher on all components of the qualitative assessment compared with HF‐MRI. In addition, the quantitative assessment showed that micro‐CT had lower interobserver variability and higher signal‐to‐noise and contrast‐to‐noise ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that micro‐CT outperforms HF‐MRI in postmortem whole‐body fetal imaging in terms of both quantitative and qualitative outcomes. Combined, these findings suggest that the ability to extract diagnostic information is greater when assessing micro‐CT compared with HF‐MRI images. We, therefore, believe that micro‐CT is the preferred imaging modality as an alternative to conventional fetal autopsy for early gestation and is an indispensable tool in postmortem imaging services. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9328149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93281492022-07-30 Comparison of postmortem whole‐body contrast‐enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses Dawood, Y. Honhoff, C. van der Post, A.‐S. Roosendaal, S. D. Coolen, B. F. Strijkers, G. J. Pajkrt, E. de Bakker, B. S. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Original Papers OBJECTIVE: Although fetal autopsy is generally recommended to confirm or refute the antemortem diagnosis, parental acceptance of the procedure has fallen over time, mainly due to its invasiveness. Contrast‐enhanced microfocus CT (micro‐CT) and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging (HF‐MRI, ≥ 3 Tesla) have both been suggested as non‐invasive alternatives to conventional fetal autopsy for fetuses < 20 weeks of gestation. The aim of this study was to compare these two modalities in postmortem whole‐body fetal imaging. METHODS: In this study, the imaging process and quality of micro‐CT and HF‐MRI were compared using both qualitative and quantitative assessments. For the qualitative evaluation, fetal anatomy experts scored 56 HF‐MRI and 56 micro‐CT images of four human fetuses aged 13–18 gestational weeks on two components: overall image quality and the ability to recognize and assess 21 anatomical structures. For the quantitative evaluation, participants segmented manually three organs with increasing complexity to assess interobserver variability. In addition, the signal‐to‐noise and contrast‐to‐noise ratios of five major organs were determined. RESULTS: Both imaging techniques were able to reach submillimeter voxel size. The highest resolution of micro‐CT was 22 µm (isotropic), while the highest resolution of HF‐MRI was 137 µm (isotropic). The qualitative image assessment form was sent to 45 fetal anatomy experts, of whom 36 (80%) responded. It was observed that micro‐CT scored higher on all components of the qualitative assessment compared with HF‐MRI. In addition, the quantitative assessment showed that micro‐CT had lower interobserver variability and higher signal‐to‐noise and contrast‐to‐noise ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that micro‐CT outperforms HF‐MRI in postmortem whole‐body fetal imaging in terms of both quantitative and qualitative outcomes. Combined, these findings suggest that the ability to extract diagnostic information is greater when assessing micro‐CT compared with HF‐MRI images. We, therefore, believe that micro‐CT is the preferred imaging modality as an alternative to conventional fetal autopsy for early gestation and is an indispensable tool in postmortem imaging services. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2022-07-01 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9328149/ /pubmed/34826157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.24827 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Dawood, Y.
Honhoff, C.
van der Post, A.‐S.
Roosendaal, S. D.
Coolen, B. F.
Strijkers, G. J.
Pajkrt, E.
de Bakker, B. S.
Comparison of postmortem whole‐body contrast‐enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses
title Comparison of postmortem whole‐body contrast‐enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses
title_full Comparison of postmortem whole‐body contrast‐enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses
title_fullStr Comparison of postmortem whole‐body contrast‐enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of postmortem whole‐body contrast‐enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses
title_short Comparison of postmortem whole‐body contrast‐enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses
title_sort comparison of postmortem whole‐body contrast‐enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high‐field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34826157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.24827
work_keys_str_mv AT dawoody comparisonofpostmortemwholebodycontrastenhancedmicrofocuscomputedtomographyandhighfieldmagneticresonanceimagingofhumanfetuses
AT honhoffc comparisonofpostmortemwholebodycontrastenhancedmicrofocuscomputedtomographyandhighfieldmagneticresonanceimagingofhumanfetuses
AT vanderpostas comparisonofpostmortemwholebodycontrastenhancedmicrofocuscomputedtomographyandhighfieldmagneticresonanceimagingofhumanfetuses
AT roosendaalsd comparisonofpostmortemwholebodycontrastenhancedmicrofocuscomputedtomographyandhighfieldmagneticresonanceimagingofhumanfetuses
AT coolenbf comparisonofpostmortemwholebodycontrastenhancedmicrofocuscomputedtomographyandhighfieldmagneticresonanceimagingofhumanfetuses
AT strijkersgj comparisonofpostmortemwholebodycontrastenhancedmicrofocuscomputedtomographyandhighfieldmagneticresonanceimagingofhumanfetuses
AT pajkrte comparisonofpostmortemwholebodycontrastenhancedmicrofocuscomputedtomographyandhighfieldmagneticresonanceimagingofhumanfetuses
AT debakkerbs comparisonofpostmortemwholebodycontrastenhancedmicrofocuscomputedtomographyandhighfieldmagneticresonanceimagingofhumanfetuses