Cargando…
Basophil Activation Test as a Biomarker for Taxanes Anaphylaxis
INTRODUCTION: Taxanes are widely used chemotherapy agents, and their administration, despite premedication, is associated with hypersensitivity reactions (HR) in up to 9% of patients, 1% of which are severe. The mechanisms of these reactions are not fully understood. Finding biomarkers for early dia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35910859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2022.787749 |
_version_ | 1784757654639345664 |
---|---|
author | De Campos, Lucila Giavina-Bianchi, Pedro Acharya, Shree Lynch, Donna-Marie Kalil, Jorge Castells, Mariana C. |
author_facet | De Campos, Lucila Giavina-Bianchi, Pedro Acharya, Shree Lynch, Donna-Marie Kalil, Jorge Castells, Mariana C. |
author_sort | De Campos, Lucila |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Taxanes are widely used chemotherapy agents, and their administration, despite premedication, is associated with hypersensitivity reactions (HR) in up to 9% of patients, 1% of which are severe. The mechanisms of these reactions are not fully understood. Finding biomarkers for early diagnosis and better understanding the underlying mechanisms of these reactions are key to defining the best treatment strategy for patients. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the basophil activation test (BAT) to diagnose patients with anaphylactic reactions to taxanes. Patients with anaphylaxis to taxane compounds (n = 15) were assessed through clinical history, skin testing (when possible), and BAT. BAT was performed immediately before rapid drug desensitization or before skin testing using anti-CD123 conjugated (APC-Biolegend), anti-HLADR conjugated (FITC-Biolegend) to gate Basophils and anti-CD63 conjugated (PE-Biolegend), and anti-CD203c conjugated (BV-Biolegend) to assess CD203c and CD63 expression on basophils under taxane stimulation. BAT was also performed in eight healthy volunteers. RESULTS: BAT was positive for CD203c in eight out of 15 patients and for CD63 in four out of 15 patients and in two out of eight controls. The sensitivity for CD203c was 53%, the specificity was 87%, and the area under the curve was 0.66 (p = 0.19%). For CD63, these rates were 33%, 87%, and 0.6 (p = 0.4). In a subgroup analysis of patients with positive skin tests (11 patients), CD203c was positive in six patients (sensitivity of 54.5% and specificity of 87.5%), and CD63 was positive in five patients (sensitivity of 45% and specificity of 75%). CONCLUSIONS: BAT as a diagnostic tool for immediate hypersensitivity reactions to taxanes may be relevant in patients with selected phenotypes and endotypes, especially those with severe reactions or when the diagnosis cannot be established by the skin test. Increased expression of CD203c was more frequent than of CD63 in patients with positive results, and the sensitivity of this biomarker was higher in patient sub-group with positive skin tests, i.e., patients with IgE-mediated endotypes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9328177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93281772022-07-28 Basophil Activation Test as a Biomarker for Taxanes Anaphylaxis De Campos, Lucila Giavina-Bianchi, Pedro Acharya, Shree Lynch, Donna-Marie Kalil, Jorge Castells, Mariana C. Front Allergy Allergy INTRODUCTION: Taxanes are widely used chemotherapy agents, and their administration, despite premedication, is associated with hypersensitivity reactions (HR) in up to 9% of patients, 1% of which are severe. The mechanisms of these reactions are not fully understood. Finding biomarkers for early diagnosis and better understanding the underlying mechanisms of these reactions are key to defining the best treatment strategy for patients. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the basophil activation test (BAT) to diagnose patients with anaphylactic reactions to taxanes. Patients with anaphylaxis to taxane compounds (n = 15) were assessed through clinical history, skin testing (when possible), and BAT. BAT was performed immediately before rapid drug desensitization or before skin testing using anti-CD123 conjugated (APC-Biolegend), anti-HLADR conjugated (FITC-Biolegend) to gate Basophils and anti-CD63 conjugated (PE-Biolegend), and anti-CD203c conjugated (BV-Biolegend) to assess CD203c and CD63 expression on basophils under taxane stimulation. BAT was also performed in eight healthy volunteers. RESULTS: BAT was positive for CD203c in eight out of 15 patients and for CD63 in four out of 15 patients and in two out of eight controls. The sensitivity for CD203c was 53%, the specificity was 87%, and the area under the curve was 0.66 (p = 0.19%). For CD63, these rates were 33%, 87%, and 0.6 (p = 0.4). In a subgroup analysis of patients with positive skin tests (11 patients), CD203c was positive in six patients (sensitivity of 54.5% and specificity of 87.5%), and CD63 was positive in five patients (sensitivity of 45% and specificity of 75%). CONCLUSIONS: BAT as a diagnostic tool for immediate hypersensitivity reactions to taxanes may be relevant in patients with selected phenotypes and endotypes, especially those with severe reactions or when the diagnosis cannot be established by the skin test. Increased expression of CD203c was more frequent than of CD63 in patients with positive results, and the sensitivity of this biomarker was higher in patient sub-group with positive skin tests, i.e., patients with IgE-mediated endotypes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9328177/ /pubmed/35910859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2022.787749 Text en Copyright © 2022 Campos, Giavina-Bianchi, Acharya, Lynch, Kalil and Castells. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Allergy De Campos, Lucila Giavina-Bianchi, Pedro Acharya, Shree Lynch, Donna-Marie Kalil, Jorge Castells, Mariana C. Basophil Activation Test as a Biomarker for Taxanes Anaphylaxis |
title | Basophil Activation Test as a Biomarker for Taxanes Anaphylaxis |
title_full | Basophil Activation Test as a Biomarker for Taxanes Anaphylaxis |
title_fullStr | Basophil Activation Test as a Biomarker for Taxanes Anaphylaxis |
title_full_unstemmed | Basophil Activation Test as a Biomarker for Taxanes Anaphylaxis |
title_short | Basophil Activation Test as a Biomarker for Taxanes Anaphylaxis |
title_sort | basophil activation test as a biomarker for taxanes anaphylaxis |
topic | Allergy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35910859 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2022.787749 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decamposlucila basophilactivationtestasabiomarkerfortaxanesanaphylaxis AT giavinabianchipedro basophilactivationtestasabiomarkerfortaxanesanaphylaxis AT acharyashree basophilactivationtestasabiomarkerfortaxanesanaphylaxis AT lynchdonnamarie basophilactivationtestasabiomarkerfortaxanesanaphylaxis AT kaliljorge basophilactivationtestasabiomarkerfortaxanesanaphylaxis AT castellsmarianac basophilactivationtestasabiomarkerfortaxanesanaphylaxis |