Cargando…

The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with vascular calcification (VC) in the aorto‐iliac arteries is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate their survival outcomes. Studies from January 1st, 2000 until March 5th, 2019 were included. Outcomes for met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rijkse, Elsaline, van Dam, Jacob L., Roodnat, Joke I., Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N., IJzermans, Jan N. M., Minnee, Robert C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32034811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.13592
_version_ 1784757704252719104
author Rijkse, Elsaline
van Dam, Jacob L.
Roodnat, Joke I.
Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N.
IJzermans, Jan N. M.
Minnee, Robert C.
author_facet Rijkse, Elsaline
van Dam, Jacob L.
Roodnat, Joke I.
Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N.
IJzermans, Jan N. M.
Minnee, Robert C.
author_sort Rijkse, Elsaline
collection PubMed
description The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with vascular calcification (VC) in the aorto‐iliac arteries is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate their survival outcomes. Studies from January 1st, 2000 until March 5th, 2019 were included. Outcomes for meta‐analysis were patient survival, (death‐censored) graft survival and delayed graft function (DGF). Twenty‐one studies were identified, eight provided data for meta‐analysis. KTR with VC had a significantly increased mortality risk [1‐year: risk ratio (RR) 2.19 (1.39–3.44), 5‐year: RR 2.28 (1.86–2.79)]. The risk of 1‐year graft loss was three times higher in recipients with VC [RR 3.15 (1.30–7.64)]. The risk of graft loss censored for death [1‐year: RR 2.26 (0.58–2.73), 3‐year: RR 2.19 (0.49–9.82)] and the risk of DGF (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98–1.58) were not statistically different. The quality of the evidence was rated as very low. To conclude, the presence of VC was associated with an increased mortality risk and risk of graft loss. In this small sample size, no statistical significant association between VC and DGF or risk of death‐censored graft loss could be demonstrated. For interpretation of the outcomes, the quality and sample size of the evidence should be taken into consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9328363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93283632022-07-30 The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Rijkse, Elsaline van Dam, Jacob L. Roodnat, Joke I. Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N. IJzermans, Jan N. M. Minnee, Robert C. Transpl Int Meta‐analysis The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with vascular calcification (VC) in the aorto‐iliac arteries is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate their survival outcomes. Studies from January 1st, 2000 until March 5th, 2019 were included. Outcomes for meta‐analysis were patient survival, (death‐censored) graft survival and delayed graft function (DGF). Twenty‐one studies were identified, eight provided data for meta‐analysis. KTR with VC had a significantly increased mortality risk [1‐year: risk ratio (RR) 2.19 (1.39–3.44), 5‐year: RR 2.28 (1.86–2.79)]. The risk of 1‐year graft loss was three times higher in recipients with VC [RR 3.15 (1.30–7.64)]. The risk of graft loss censored for death [1‐year: RR 2.26 (0.58–2.73), 3‐year: RR 2.19 (0.49–9.82)] and the risk of DGF (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98–1.58) were not statistically different. The quality of the evidence was rated as very low. To conclude, the presence of VC was associated with an increased mortality risk and risk of graft loss. In this small sample size, no statistical significant association between VC and DGF or risk of death‐censored graft loss could be demonstrated. For interpretation of the outcomes, the quality and sample size of the evidence should be taken into consideration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-04 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9328363/ /pubmed/32034811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.13592 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Meta‐analysis
Rijkse, Elsaline
van Dam, Jacob L.
Roodnat, Joke I.
Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N.
IJzermans, Jan N. M.
Minnee, Robert C.
The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32034811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.13592
work_keys_str_mv AT rijkseelsaline theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vandamjacobl theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT roodnatjokei theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimenaihendrikusjan theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ijzermansjannm theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT minneerobertc theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rijkseelsaline prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vandamjacobl prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT roodnatjokei prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimenaihendrikusjan prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ijzermansjannm prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT minneerobertc prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis