Cargando…
The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with vascular calcification (VC) in the aorto‐iliac arteries is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate their survival outcomes. Studies from January 1st, 2000 until March 5th, 2019 were included. Outcomes for met...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32034811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.13592 |
_version_ | 1784757704252719104 |
---|---|
author | Rijkse, Elsaline van Dam, Jacob L. Roodnat, Joke I. Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N. IJzermans, Jan N. M. Minnee, Robert C. |
author_facet | Rijkse, Elsaline van Dam, Jacob L. Roodnat, Joke I. Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N. IJzermans, Jan N. M. Minnee, Robert C. |
author_sort | Rijkse, Elsaline |
collection | PubMed |
description | The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with vascular calcification (VC) in the aorto‐iliac arteries is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate their survival outcomes. Studies from January 1st, 2000 until March 5th, 2019 were included. Outcomes for meta‐analysis were patient survival, (death‐censored) graft survival and delayed graft function (DGF). Twenty‐one studies were identified, eight provided data for meta‐analysis. KTR with VC had a significantly increased mortality risk [1‐year: risk ratio (RR) 2.19 (1.39–3.44), 5‐year: RR 2.28 (1.86–2.79)]. The risk of 1‐year graft loss was three times higher in recipients with VC [RR 3.15 (1.30–7.64)]. The risk of graft loss censored for death [1‐year: RR 2.26 (0.58–2.73), 3‐year: RR 2.19 (0.49–9.82)] and the risk of DGF (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98–1.58) were not statistically different. The quality of the evidence was rated as very low. To conclude, the presence of VC was associated with an increased mortality risk and risk of graft loss. In this small sample size, no statistical significant association between VC and DGF or risk of death‐censored graft loss could be demonstrated. For interpretation of the outcomes, the quality and sample size of the evidence should be taken into consideration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9328363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93283632022-07-30 The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Rijkse, Elsaline van Dam, Jacob L. Roodnat, Joke I. Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N. IJzermans, Jan N. M. Minnee, Robert C. Transpl Int Meta‐analysis The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with vascular calcification (VC) in the aorto‐iliac arteries is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate their survival outcomes. Studies from January 1st, 2000 until March 5th, 2019 were included. Outcomes for meta‐analysis were patient survival, (death‐censored) graft survival and delayed graft function (DGF). Twenty‐one studies were identified, eight provided data for meta‐analysis. KTR with VC had a significantly increased mortality risk [1‐year: risk ratio (RR) 2.19 (1.39–3.44), 5‐year: RR 2.28 (1.86–2.79)]. The risk of 1‐year graft loss was three times higher in recipients with VC [RR 3.15 (1.30–7.64)]. The risk of graft loss censored for death [1‐year: RR 2.26 (0.58–2.73), 3‐year: RR 2.19 (0.49–9.82)] and the risk of DGF (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98–1.58) were not statistically different. The quality of the evidence was rated as very low. To conclude, the presence of VC was associated with an increased mortality risk and risk of graft loss. In this small sample size, no statistical significant association between VC and DGF or risk of death‐censored graft loss could be demonstrated. For interpretation of the outcomes, the quality and sample size of the evidence should be taken into consideration. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-04 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9328363/ /pubmed/32034811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.13592 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Meta‐analysis Rijkse, Elsaline van Dam, Jacob L. Roodnat, Joke I. Kimenai, Hendrikus J. A. N. IJzermans, Jan N. M. Minnee, Robert C. The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | The prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | prognosis of kidney transplant recipients with aorto‐iliac calcification: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Meta‐analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32034811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.13592 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rijkseelsaline theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vandamjacobl theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT roodnatjokei theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimenaihendrikusjan theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ijzermansjannm theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT minneerobertc theprognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rijkseelsaline prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vandamjacobl prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT roodnatjokei prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimenaihendrikusjan prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ijzermansjannm prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT minneerobertc prognosisofkidneytransplantrecipientswithaortoiliaccalcificationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |