Cargando…

Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter

Although social media can be a source of guidance about HPV vaccination for parents, the information may not always be complete or accurate. We conducted a retrospective content analysis to identify content and frequencies of occurrence of disinformation and misinformation about HPV vaccine posted o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kornides, Melanie L., Badlis, Sarah, Head, Katharine J., Putt, Mary, Cappella, Joseph, Gonzalez-Hernadez, Graciela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35896853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00342-1
_version_ 1784757769443737600
author Kornides, Melanie L.
Badlis, Sarah
Head, Katharine J.
Putt, Mary
Cappella, Joseph
Gonzalez-Hernadez, Graciela
author_facet Kornides, Melanie L.
Badlis, Sarah
Head, Katharine J.
Putt, Mary
Cappella, Joseph
Gonzalez-Hernadez, Graciela
author_sort Kornides, Melanie L.
collection PubMed
description Although social media can be a source of guidance about HPV vaccination for parents, the information may not always be complete or accurate. We conducted a retrospective content analysis to identify content and frequencies of occurrence of disinformation and misinformation about HPV vaccine posted on Twitter between December 15, 2019, through March 31, 2020, among 3876 unique, English language #HPV Tweets, excluding retweets. We found that 24% of Tweets contained disinformation or misinformation, and the remaining 76% contained support/education. The most prevalent categories of disinformation/misinformation were (1) adverse health effects (59%), (2) mandatory vaccination (19%), and (3) inefficacy of the vaccine (14%). Among the adverse health effects Tweets, non-specific harm/injury (51%) and death (23%) were most frequent. Disinformation/misinformation Tweets vs. supportive Tweets had 5.44 (95% CI 5.33–5.56) times the incidence rate of retweet. In conclusion, almost one-quarter of #HPV Tweets contained disinformation or misinformation about the HPV vaccine and these tweets received higher audience engagement including likes and retweets. Implications for vaccine hesitancy are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9328646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93286462022-07-28 Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter Kornides, Melanie L. Badlis, Sarah Head, Katharine J. Putt, Mary Cappella, Joseph Gonzalez-Hernadez, Graciela J Behav Med Article Although social media can be a source of guidance about HPV vaccination for parents, the information may not always be complete or accurate. We conducted a retrospective content analysis to identify content and frequencies of occurrence of disinformation and misinformation about HPV vaccine posted on Twitter between December 15, 2019, through March 31, 2020, among 3876 unique, English language #HPV Tweets, excluding retweets. We found that 24% of Tweets contained disinformation or misinformation, and the remaining 76% contained support/education. The most prevalent categories of disinformation/misinformation were (1) adverse health effects (59%), (2) mandatory vaccination (19%), and (3) inefficacy of the vaccine (14%). Among the adverse health effects Tweets, non-specific harm/injury (51%) and death (23%) were most frequent. Disinformation/misinformation Tweets vs. supportive Tweets had 5.44 (95% CI 5.33–5.56) times the incidence rate of retweet. In conclusion, almost one-quarter of #HPV Tweets contained disinformation or misinformation about the HPV vaccine and these tweets received higher audience engagement including likes and retweets. Implications for vaccine hesitancy are discussed. Springer US 2022-07-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9328646/ /pubmed/35896853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00342-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Kornides, Melanie L.
Badlis, Sarah
Head, Katharine J.
Putt, Mary
Cappella, Joseph
Gonzalez-Hernadez, Graciela
Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter
title Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter
title_full Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter
title_fullStr Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter
title_full_unstemmed Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter
title_short Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter
title_sort exploring content of misinformation about hpv vaccine on twitter
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35896853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00342-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kornidesmelaniel exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter
AT badlissarah exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter
AT headkatharinej exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter
AT puttmary exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter
AT cappellajoseph exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter
AT gonzalezhernadezgraciela exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter