Cargando…
Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter
Although social media can be a source of guidance about HPV vaccination for parents, the information may not always be complete or accurate. We conducted a retrospective content analysis to identify content and frequencies of occurrence of disinformation and misinformation about HPV vaccine posted o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35896853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00342-1 |
_version_ | 1784757769443737600 |
---|---|
author | Kornides, Melanie L. Badlis, Sarah Head, Katharine J. Putt, Mary Cappella, Joseph Gonzalez-Hernadez, Graciela |
author_facet | Kornides, Melanie L. Badlis, Sarah Head, Katharine J. Putt, Mary Cappella, Joseph Gonzalez-Hernadez, Graciela |
author_sort | Kornides, Melanie L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although social media can be a source of guidance about HPV vaccination for parents, the information may not always be complete or accurate. We conducted a retrospective content analysis to identify content and frequencies of occurrence of disinformation and misinformation about HPV vaccine posted on Twitter between December 15, 2019, through March 31, 2020, among 3876 unique, English language #HPV Tweets, excluding retweets. We found that 24% of Tweets contained disinformation or misinformation, and the remaining 76% contained support/education. The most prevalent categories of disinformation/misinformation were (1) adverse health effects (59%), (2) mandatory vaccination (19%), and (3) inefficacy of the vaccine (14%). Among the adverse health effects Tweets, non-specific harm/injury (51%) and death (23%) were most frequent. Disinformation/misinformation Tweets vs. supportive Tweets had 5.44 (95% CI 5.33–5.56) times the incidence rate of retweet. In conclusion, almost one-quarter of #HPV Tweets contained disinformation or misinformation about the HPV vaccine and these tweets received higher audience engagement including likes and retweets. Implications for vaccine hesitancy are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9328646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93286462022-07-28 Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter Kornides, Melanie L. Badlis, Sarah Head, Katharine J. Putt, Mary Cappella, Joseph Gonzalez-Hernadez, Graciela J Behav Med Article Although social media can be a source of guidance about HPV vaccination for parents, the information may not always be complete or accurate. We conducted a retrospective content analysis to identify content and frequencies of occurrence of disinformation and misinformation about HPV vaccine posted on Twitter between December 15, 2019, through March 31, 2020, among 3876 unique, English language #HPV Tweets, excluding retweets. We found that 24% of Tweets contained disinformation or misinformation, and the remaining 76% contained support/education. The most prevalent categories of disinformation/misinformation were (1) adverse health effects (59%), (2) mandatory vaccination (19%), and (3) inefficacy of the vaccine (14%). Among the adverse health effects Tweets, non-specific harm/injury (51%) and death (23%) were most frequent. Disinformation/misinformation Tweets vs. supportive Tweets had 5.44 (95% CI 5.33–5.56) times the incidence rate of retweet. In conclusion, almost one-quarter of #HPV Tweets contained disinformation or misinformation about the HPV vaccine and these tweets received higher audience engagement including likes and retweets. Implications for vaccine hesitancy are discussed. Springer US 2022-07-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9328646/ /pubmed/35896853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00342-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Kornides, Melanie L. Badlis, Sarah Head, Katharine J. Putt, Mary Cappella, Joseph Gonzalez-Hernadez, Graciela Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter |
title | Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter |
title_full | Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter |
title_fullStr | Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter |
title_short | Exploring content of misinformation about HPV vaccine on twitter |
title_sort | exploring content of misinformation about hpv vaccine on twitter |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35896853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00342-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kornidesmelaniel exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter AT badlissarah exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter AT headkatharinej exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter AT puttmary exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter AT cappellajoseph exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter AT gonzalezhernadezgraciela exploringcontentofmisinformationabouthpvvaccineontwitter |