Cargando…

Validation and assessment of matrix effect and uncertainty of a gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for pesticides in papaya and avocado samples

In this paper a method of using the “quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe” (QuEChERS) extraction and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detection (GC–MS) was developed for the analysis of five frequently applied pesticides in papaya and avocado. The selected pesticides, ametr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pano-Farias, Norma Susana, Ceballos-Magaña, Silvia Guillermina, Muñiz-Valencia, Roberto, Gonzalez, Jorge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taiwan Food and Drug Administration 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28911635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.09.005
_version_ 1784757802419355648
author Pano-Farias, Norma Susana
Ceballos-Magaña, Silvia Guillermina
Muñiz-Valencia, Roberto
Gonzalez, Jorge
author_facet Pano-Farias, Norma Susana
Ceballos-Magaña, Silvia Guillermina
Muñiz-Valencia, Roberto
Gonzalez, Jorge
author_sort Pano-Farias, Norma Susana
collection PubMed
description In this paper a method of using the “quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe” (QuEChERS) extraction and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detection (GC–MS) was developed for the analysis of five frequently applied pesticides in papaya and avocado. The selected pesticides, ametryn, atrazine, carbaryl, carbofuran, and methyl parathion, represent the most commonly used classes (carbamates, organophosphorous, and triazines). Optimum separation achieved the analysis of all pesticides in < 6.5 minutes. Validation using papaya and avocado samples established the proposed method as linear, accurate, and precise. In this sense, the correlation coefficients were > 0.99. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) in papaya ranged from 0.03 mg/kg to 0.35 mg/kg and from 0.06 mg/kg to 0.75 mg/kg, respectively. Meanwhile for avocado, LOD values varied from 0.14 mg/kg to 0.28 mg/kg and LOQ values ranged from 0.22 mg/kg to 0.40 mg/kg. Recoveries obtained for each pesticide in both matrices ranged between 60.6% and 104.3%. The expanded uncertainty of the method was < 26% for all the pesticides in both fruits. Finally, the method was applied to other fruits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9328818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taiwan Food and Drug Administration
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93288182022-08-09 Validation and assessment of matrix effect and uncertainty of a gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for pesticides in papaya and avocado samples Pano-Farias, Norma Susana Ceballos-Magaña, Silvia Guillermina Muñiz-Valencia, Roberto Gonzalez, Jorge J Food Drug Anal Original Article In this paper a method of using the “quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe” (QuEChERS) extraction and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detection (GC–MS) was developed for the analysis of five frequently applied pesticides in papaya and avocado. The selected pesticides, ametryn, atrazine, carbaryl, carbofuran, and methyl parathion, represent the most commonly used classes (carbamates, organophosphorous, and triazines). Optimum separation achieved the analysis of all pesticides in < 6.5 minutes. Validation using papaya and avocado samples established the proposed method as linear, accurate, and precise. In this sense, the correlation coefficients were > 0.99. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) in papaya ranged from 0.03 mg/kg to 0.35 mg/kg and from 0.06 mg/kg to 0.75 mg/kg, respectively. Meanwhile for avocado, LOD values varied from 0.14 mg/kg to 0.28 mg/kg and LOQ values ranged from 0.22 mg/kg to 0.40 mg/kg. Recoveries obtained for each pesticide in both matrices ranged between 60.6% and 104.3%. The expanded uncertainty of the method was < 26% for all the pesticides in both fruits. Finally, the method was applied to other fruits. Taiwan Food and Drug Administration 2016-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9328818/ /pubmed/28911635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.09.005 Text en © 2017 Taiwan Food and Drug Administration https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Original Article
Pano-Farias, Norma Susana
Ceballos-Magaña, Silvia Guillermina
Muñiz-Valencia, Roberto
Gonzalez, Jorge
Validation and assessment of matrix effect and uncertainty of a gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for pesticides in papaya and avocado samples
title Validation and assessment of matrix effect and uncertainty of a gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for pesticides in papaya and avocado samples
title_full Validation and assessment of matrix effect and uncertainty of a gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for pesticides in papaya and avocado samples
title_fullStr Validation and assessment of matrix effect and uncertainty of a gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for pesticides in papaya and avocado samples
title_full_unstemmed Validation and assessment of matrix effect and uncertainty of a gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for pesticides in papaya and avocado samples
title_short Validation and assessment of matrix effect and uncertainty of a gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for pesticides in papaya and avocado samples
title_sort validation and assessment of matrix effect and uncertainty of a gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method for pesticides in papaya and avocado samples
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9328818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28911635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.09.005
work_keys_str_mv AT panofariasnormasusana validationandassessmentofmatrixeffectanduncertaintyofagaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometrymethodforpesticidesinpapayaandavocadosamples
AT ceballosmaganasilviaguillermina validationandassessmentofmatrixeffectanduncertaintyofagaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometrymethodforpesticidesinpapayaandavocadosamples
AT munizvalenciaroberto validationandassessmentofmatrixeffectanduncertaintyofagaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometrymethodforpesticidesinpapayaandavocadosamples
AT gonzalezjorge validationandassessmentofmatrixeffectanduncertaintyofagaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometrymethodforpesticidesinpapayaandavocadosamples