Cargando…
A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Crossover Phase III Equivalence Study of Generic Dorzolamide 2% versus Innovator Trusopt® Eye Drop Solution in Subjects with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the equivalence of generic dorzolamide 2% eye drops solution versus the innovator formulation (Trusopt® eye drops solution) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This prospective, monocentric, double-masked, active-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5249922 |
_version_ | 1784757847942234112 |
---|---|
author | Bell, Katharina Korb, Christina Butsch, Christina Giers, Bert Constantin Beck, Anna Strzalkowska, Alicja Ruckes, Christian Klingberg, Ulrike Pfeiffer, Norbert Lorenz, Katrin |
author_facet | Bell, Katharina Korb, Christina Butsch, Christina Giers, Bert Constantin Beck, Anna Strzalkowska, Alicja Ruckes, Christian Klingberg, Ulrike Pfeiffer, Norbert Lorenz, Katrin |
author_sort | Bell, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the equivalence of generic dorzolamide 2% eye drops solution versus the innovator formulation (Trusopt® eye drops solution) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This prospective, monocentric, double-masked, active-controlled crossover phase III study included 32 patients. After washout, patients were randomized to reference product (Trusopt®) or test product (dorzolamide 2% eye drops, Rompharm Company SRL) for a 4-week period. Subsequent washout and crossover were performed. Drops were applied t.i.d. The primary efficacy endpoint was the difference in mean diurnal IOP. Goldmann applanation tonometry was performed at 8 am, 12 pm, and 4 pm at each visit, and safety was assessed by documentation of adverse events (AEs). Therapy adherence was documented by self-reporting and eye drop bottle weighing. An ANOVA with treatment, sequence, study period, and patient within the sequence as effects was performed and an additional post hoc ANCOVA including the baseline IOP was also performed. RESULTS: 34 patients were randomized and analyzed in the safety population. The per-protocol population included 32 patients. According to the self-report, all patients were >80% compliant. Under the ANCOVA model, the 90% confidence interval for the average change of the IOP −0.27 mmHg (−1.17 mmHg–0.64 mmHg) is included by the acceptance range −1.5 mmHg to +1.5 mmHg after excluding 2 patients, which had falsely reported high therapy adherence. No clinically relevant difference was observed in frequency or severity of the AEs between both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the equivalence of the tested generic dorzolamide 2% eye drops solution to the reference product Trusopt® eye drops solution. Trial Registration. This trial is registered with (ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT00878917) on April 9, 2009). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9329021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93290212022-07-28 A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Crossover Phase III Equivalence Study of Generic Dorzolamide 2% versus Innovator Trusopt® Eye Drop Solution in Subjects with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Bell, Katharina Korb, Christina Butsch, Christina Giers, Bert Constantin Beck, Anna Strzalkowska, Alicja Ruckes, Christian Klingberg, Ulrike Pfeiffer, Norbert Lorenz, Katrin J Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the equivalence of generic dorzolamide 2% eye drops solution versus the innovator formulation (Trusopt® eye drops solution) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This prospective, monocentric, double-masked, active-controlled crossover phase III study included 32 patients. After washout, patients were randomized to reference product (Trusopt®) or test product (dorzolamide 2% eye drops, Rompharm Company SRL) for a 4-week period. Subsequent washout and crossover were performed. Drops were applied t.i.d. The primary efficacy endpoint was the difference in mean diurnal IOP. Goldmann applanation tonometry was performed at 8 am, 12 pm, and 4 pm at each visit, and safety was assessed by documentation of adverse events (AEs). Therapy adherence was documented by self-reporting and eye drop bottle weighing. An ANOVA with treatment, sequence, study period, and patient within the sequence as effects was performed and an additional post hoc ANCOVA including the baseline IOP was also performed. RESULTS: 34 patients were randomized and analyzed in the safety population. The per-protocol population included 32 patients. According to the self-report, all patients were >80% compliant. Under the ANCOVA model, the 90% confidence interval for the average change of the IOP −0.27 mmHg (−1.17 mmHg–0.64 mmHg) is included by the acceptance range −1.5 mmHg to +1.5 mmHg after excluding 2 patients, which had falsely reported high therapy adherence. No clinically relevant difference was observed in frequency or severity of the AEs between both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the equivalence of the tested generic dorzolamide 2% eye drops solution to the reference product Trusopt® eye drops solution. Trial Registration. This trial is registered with (ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT00878917) on April 9, 2009). Hindawi 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9329021/ /pubmed/35909461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5249922 Text en Copyright © 2022 Katharina Bell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bell, Katharina Korb, Christina Butsch, Christina Giers, Bert Constantin Beck, Anna Strzalkowska, Alicja Ruckes, Christian Klingberg, Ulrike Pfeiffer, Norbert Lorenz, Katrin A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Crossover Phase III Equivalence Study of Generic Dorzolamide 2% versus Innovator Trusopt® Eye Drop Solution in Subjects with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension |
title | A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Crossover Phase III Equivalence Study of Generic Dorzolamide 2% versus Innovator Trusopt® Eye Drop Solution in Subjects with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension |
title_full | A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Crossover Phase III Equivalence Study of Generic Dorzolamide 2% versus Innovator Trusopt® Eye Drop Solution in Subjects with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension |
title_fullStr | A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Crossover Phase III Equivalence Study of Generic Dorzolamide 2% versus Innovator Trusopt® Eye Drop Solution in Subjects with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Crossover Phase III Equivalence Study of Generic Dorzolamide 2% versus Innovator Trusopt® Eye Drop Solution in Subjects with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension |
title_short | A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Crossover Phase III Equivalence Study of Generic Dorzolamide 2% versus Innovator Trusopt® Eye Drop Solution in Subjects with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension |
title_sort | randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, crossover phase iii equivalence study of generic dorzolamide 2% versus innovator trusopt® eye drop solution in subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5249922 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bellkatharina arandomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT korbchristina arandomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT butschchristina arandomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT giersbertconstantin arandomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT beckanna arandomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT strzalkowskaalicja arandomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT ruckeschristian arandomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT klingbergulrike arandomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT pfeiffernorbert arandomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT lorenzkatrin arandomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT bellkatharina randomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT korbchristina randomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT butschchristina randomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT giersbertconstantin randomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT beckanna randomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT strzalkowskaalicja randomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT ruckeschristian randomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT klingbergulrike randomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT pfeiffernorbert randomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension AT lorenzkatrin randomizeddoublemaskedactivecontrolledcrossoverphaseiiiequivalencestudyofgenericdorzolamide2versusinnovatortrusopteyedropsolutioninsubjectswithopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension |