Cargando…
Surviving Sepsis Guideline–Directed Fluid Resuscitation: An Assessment of Practice Patterns and Impact on Patient Outcomes
IMPORTANCE: Aggressive fluid resuscitation remains a cornerstone of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines, but there is growing controversy regarding the recommended 30 mL/kg IV fluid dosage. It is contended that, in selected patients, this volume confers an increased risk of volume overloa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35923594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000739 |
_version_ | 1784757860246224896 |
---|---|
author | Govero, Austin B. Yarrarapu, Siva Naga S. Harrison, Michael F. Baig, Hassan Z. Guru, Pramod Moreno Franco, Pablo Caples, Sean M. Grek, Ami A. Vizzini, Michael R. Ball, Colleen T. Khan, Syed A. Heise, Katherine J. Sekiguchi, Hiroshi Cantrell, Warren L. Sanghavi, Devang K. |
author_facet | Govero, Austin B. Yarrarapu, Siva Naga S. Harrison, Michael F. Baig, Hassan Z. Guru, Pramod Moreno Franco, Pablo Caples, Sean M. Grek, Ami A. Vizzini, Michael R. Ball, Colleen T. Khan, Syed A. Heise, Katherine J. Sekiguchi, Hiroshi Cantrell, Warren L. Sanghavi, Devang K. |
author_sort | Govero, Austin B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Aggressive fluid resuscitation remains a cornerstone of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines, but there is growing controversy regarding the recommended 30 mL/kg IV fluid dosage. It is contended that, in selected patients, this volume confers an increased risk of volume overload without either concomitant benefit or strong evidence in support of the recommended IV fluid dosage. OBJECTIVES: Assessment of practice patterns and their impact on patient outcomes following the surviving sepsis guidelines for fluid resuscitation. DESIGN: Large, multisite retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The retrospective study included all adult patients who presented to the emergency department at one of 19 different Mayo Clinic sites throughout the Midwest, Southeast, and Southwest from August 2018 to November 2020 with suspected sepsis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Eight-thousand four-hundred fourteen patients suspected to have sepsis were assessed regarding fluid resuscitation and outcomes among patients receiving 30 mL/kg IV fluid dosing compared with patients who did not. Patient demographics and clinical information were collected via electronic health records. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who received 0–29.9 mL/kg of IV fluid and those who received 30.0+ mL/kg of IV fluid. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of fluid dose on in-hospital death, 30-day mortality, ICU admission after diagnosis, dialysis initiation after diagnosis, ventilator use, vasopressor use, as well as ICU and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: We observed lower in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality risk in the 30+ mL/kg dosing group. Increased fluid dosage did, however, carry a much greater chance of ICU admission. Most patients (72% after propensity score weighting) in our population received less than 30 mL/kg fluid (based on ideal body weight). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: IV fluid dosing for sepsis resuscitation greater than 30 mL/kg was associated with decreased risk of in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and reduced risk of requiring mechanical ventilation. Our data does ultimately seem to support the SSC recommendation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9329079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93290792022-08-02 Surviving Sepsis Guideline–Directed Fluid Resuscitation: An Assessment of Practice Patterns and Impact on Patient Outcomes Govero, Austin B. Yarrarapu, Siva Naga S. Harrison, Michael F. Baig, Hassan Z. Guru, Pramod Moreno Franco, Pablo Caples, Sean M. Grek, Ami A. Vizzini, Michael R. Ball, Colleen T. Khan, Syed A. Heise, Katherine J. Sekiguchi, Hiroshi Cantrell, Warren L. Sanghavi, Devang K. Crit Care Explor Observational Study IMPORTANCE: Aggressive fluid resuscitation remains a cornerstone of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines, but there is growing controversy regarding the recommended 30 mL/kg IV fluid dosage. It is contended that, in selected patients, this volume confers an increased risk of volume overload without either concomitant benefit or strong evidence in support of the recommended IV fluid dosage. OBJECTIVES: Assessment of practice patterns and their impact on patient outcomes following the surviving sepsis guidelines for fluid resuscitation. DESIGN: Large, multisite retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The retrospective study included all adult patients who presented to the emergency department at one of 19 different Mayo Clinic sites throughout the Midwest, Southeast, and Southwest from August 2018 to November 2020 with suspected sepsis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Eight-thousand four-hundred fourteen patients suspected to have sepsis were assessed regarding fluid resuscitation and outcomes among patients receiving 30 mL/kg IV fluid dosing compared with patients who did not. Patient demographics and clinical information were collected via electronic health records. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who received 0–29.9 mL/kg of IV fluid and those who received 30.0+ mL/kg of IV fluid. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of fluid dose on in-hospital death, 30-day mortality, ICU admission after diagnosis, dialysis initiation after diagnosis, ventilator use, vasopressor use, as well as ICU and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: We observed lower in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality risk in the 30+ mL/kg dosing group. Increased fluid dosage did, however, carry a much greater chance of ICU admission. Most patients (72% after propensity score weighting) in our population received less than 30 mL/kg fluid (based on ideal body weight). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: IV fluid dosing for sepsis resuscitation greater than 30 mL/kg was associated with decreased risk of in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and reduced risk of requiring mechanical ventilation. Our data does ultimately seem to support the SSC recommendation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9329079/ /pubmed/35923594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000739 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Govero, Austin B. Yarrarapu, Siva Naga S. Harrison, Michael F. Baig, Hassan Z. Guru, Pramod Moreno Franco, Pablo Caples, Sean M. Grek, Ami A. Vizzini, Michael R. Ball, Colleen T. Khan, Syed A. Heise, Katherine J. Sekiguchi, Hiroshi Cantrell, Warren L. Sanghavi, Devang K. Surviving Sepsis Guideline–Directed Fluid Resuscitation: An Assessment of Practice Patterns and Impact on Patient Outcomes |
title | Surviving Sepsis Guideline–Directed Fluid Resuscitation: An Assessment of Practice Patterns and Impact on Patient Outcomes |
title_full | Surviving Sepsis Guideline–Directed Fluid Resuscitation: An Assessment of Practice Patterns and Impact on Patient Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Surviving Sepsis Guideline–Directed Fluid Resuscitation: An Assessment of Practice Patterns and Impact on Patient Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Surviving Sepsis Guideline–Directed Fluid Resuscitation: An Assessment of Practice Patterns and Impact on Patient Outcomes |
title_short | Surviving Sepsis Guideline–Directed Fluid Resuscitation: An Assessment of Practice Patterns and Impact on Patient Outcomes |
title_sort | surviving sepsis guideline–directed fluid resuscitation: an assessment of practice patterns and impact on patient outcomes |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35923594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goveroaustinb survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT yarrarapusivanagas survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT harrisonmichaelf survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT baighassanz survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT gurupramod survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT morenofrancopablo survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT caplesseanm survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT grekamia survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT vizzinimichaelr survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT ballcolleent survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT khansyeda survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT heisekatherinej survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT sekiguchihiroshi survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT cantrellwarrenl survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT sanghavidevangk survivingsepsisguidelinedirectedfluidresuscitationanassessmentofpracticepatternsandimpactonpatientoutcomes |