Cargando…

Improving the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of 16S rRNA Nanopore Metagenomics in Culture-Negative Samples

While 16S rRNA PCR-Sanger sequencing has paved the way for the diagnosis of culture-negative bacterial infections, it does not provide the composition of polymicrobial infections. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Nanopore-based 16S rRNA metagenomic approach, using both partial and full-le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouchiat, Coralie, Ginevra, Christophe, Benito, Yvonne, Gaillard, Tiphaine, Salord, Hélène, Dauwalder, Olivier, Laurent, Frédéric, Vandenesch, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35910644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.943441
_version_ 1784757861668093952
author Bouchiat, Coralie
Ginevra, Christophe
Benito, Yvonne
Gaillard, Tiphaine
Salord, Hélène
Dauwalder, Olivier
Laurent, Frédéric
Vandenesch, François
author_facet Bouchiat, Coralie
Ginevra, Christophe
Benito, Yvonne
Gaillard, Tiphaine
Salord, Hélène
Dauwalder, Olivier
Laurent, Frédéric
Vandenesch, François
author_sort Bouchiat, Coralie
collection PubMed
description While 16S rRNA PCR-Sanger sequencing has paved the way for the diagnosis of culture-negative bacterial infections, it does not provide the composition of polymicrobial infections. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Nanopore-based 16S rRNA metagenomic approach, using both partial and full-length amplification of the gene, and to explore its feasibility and suitability as a routine diagnostic tool for bacterial infections in a clinical laboratory. Thirty-one culture-negative clinical samples from mono- and polymicrobial infections based on Sanger-sequencing results were sequenced on MinION using both the in-house partial amplification and the Nanopore dedicated kit for the full-length amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. Contamination, background noise definition, bacterial identification, and time-effectiveness issues were addressed. Cost optimization was also investigated with the miniaturized version of the flow cell (Flongle). The partial 16S approach had a greater sensitivity compared to the full-length kit that detected bacterial DNA in only 24/31 (77.4%) samples. Setting a threshold of 1% of total reads overcame the background noise issue and eased the interpretation of clinical samples. Results were obtained within 1 day, discriminated polymicrobial samples, and gave accurate bacterial identifications compared to Sanger-based results. We also found that multiplexing and using Flongle flow cells was a cost-effective option. The results confirm that Nanopore technology is user-friendly as well as cost- and time-effective. They also indicate that 16S rRNA targeted metagenomics is a suitable approach to be implemented for the routine diagnosis of culture-negative samples in clinical laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9329087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93290872022-07-29 Improving the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of 16S rRNA Nanopore Metagenomics in Culture-Negative Samples Bouchiat, Coralie Ginevra, Christophe Benito, Yvonne Gaillard, Tiphaine Salord, Hélène Dauwalder, Olivier Laurent, Frédéric Vandenesch, François Front Microbiol Microbiology While 16S rRNA PCR-Sanger sequencing has paved the way for the diagnosis of culture-negative bacterial infections, it does not provide the composition of polymicrobial infections. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Nanopore-based 16S rRNA metagenomic approach, using both partial and full-length amplification of the gene, and to explore its feasibility and suitability as a routine diagnostic tool for bacterial infections in a clinical laboratory. Thirty-one culture-negative clinical samples from mono- and polymicrobial infections based on Sanger-sequencing results were sequenced on MinION using both the in-house partial amplification and the Nanopore dedicated kit for the full-length amplification of the 16S rRNA gene. Contamination, background noise definition, bacterial identification, and time-effectiveness issues were addressed. Cost optimization was also investigated with the miniaturized version of the flow cell (Flongle). The partial 16S approach had a greater sensitivity compared to the full-length kit that detected bacterial DNA in only 24/31 (77.4%) samples. Setting a threshold of 1% of total reads overcame the background noise issue and eased the interpretation of clinical samples. Results were obtained within 1 day, discriminated polymicrobial samples, and gave accurate bacterial identifications compared to Sanger-based results. We also found that multiplexing and using Flongle flow cells was a cost-effective option. The results confirm that Nanopore technology is user-friendly as well as cost- and time-effective. They also indicate that 16S rRNA targeted metagenomics is a suitable approach to be implemented for the routine diagnosis of culture-negative samples in clinical laboratories. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9329087/ /pubmed/35910644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.943441 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bouchiat, Ginevra, Benito, Gaillard, Salord, Dauwalder, Laurent and Vandenesch. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Bouchiat, Coralie
Ginevra, Christophe
Benito, Yvonne
Gaillard, Tiphaine
Salord, Hélène
Dauwalder, Olivier
Laurent, Frédéric
Vandenesch, François
Improving the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of 16S rRNA Nanopore Metagenomics in Culture-Negative Samples
title Improving the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of 16S rRNA Nanopore Metagenomics in Culture-Negative Samples
title_full Improving the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of 16S rRNA Nanopore Metagenomics in Culture-Negative Samples
title_fullStr Improving the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of 16S rRNA Nanopore Metagenomics in Culture-Negative Samples
title_full_unstemmed Improving the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of 16S rRNA Nanopore Metagenomics in Culture-Negative Samples
title_short Improving the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections: Evaluation of 16S rRNA Nanopore Metagenomics in Culture-Negative Samples
title_sort improving the diagnosis of bacterial infections: evaluation of 16s rrna nanopore metagenomics in culture-negative samples
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35910644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.943441
work_keys_str_mv AT bouchiatcoralie improvingthediagnosisofbacterialinfectionsevaluationof16srrnananoporemetagenomicsinculturenegativesamples
AT ginevrachristophe improvingthediagnosisofbacterialinfectionsevaluationof16srrnananoporemetagenomicsinculturenegativesamples
AT benitoyvonne improvingthediagnosisofbacterialinfectionsevaluationof16srrnananoporemetagenomicsinculturenegativesamples
AT gaillardtiphaine improvingthediagnosisofbacterialinfectionsevaluationof16srrnananoporemetagenomicsinculturenegativesamples
AT salordhelene improvingthediagnosisofbacterialinfectionsevaluationof16srrnananoporemetagenomicsinculturenegativesamples
AT dauwalderolivier improvingthediagnosisofbacterialinfectionsevaluationof16srrnananoporemetagenomicsinculturenegativesamples
AT laurentfrederic improvingthediagnosisofbacterialinfectionsevaluationof16srrnananoporemetagenomicsinculturenegativesamples
AT vandeneschfrancois improvingthediagnosisofbacterialinfectionsevaluationof16srrnananoporemetagenomicsinculturenegativesamples