Cargando…

Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses

Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate the causal effect of a risk factor on an outcome. A collider is a variable influenced by two or more other variables. Naive calculation of MR estimates in strata of the population defined by a collider, such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coscia, Claudia, Gill, Dipender, Benítez, Raquel, Pérez, Teresa, Malats, Núria, Burgess, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00879-0
_version_ 1784757912440143872
author Coscia, Claudia
Gill, Dipender
Benítez, Raquel
Pérez, Teresa
Malats, Núria
Burgess, Stephen
author_facet Coscia, Claudia
Gill, Dipender
Benítez, Raquel
Pérez, Teresa
Malats, Núria
Burgess, Stephen
author_sort Coscia, Claudia
collection PubMed
description Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate the causal effect of a risk factor on an outcome. A collider is a variable influenced by two or more other variables. Naive calculation of MR estimates in strata of the population defined by a collider, such as a variable affected by the risk factor, can result in collider bias. We propose an approach that allows MR estimation in strata of the population while avoiding collider bias. This approach constructs a new variable, the residual collider, as the residual from regression of the collider on the genetic instrument, and then calculates causal estimates in strata defined by quantiles of the residual collider. Estimates stratified on the residual collider will typically have an equivalent interpretation to estimates stratified on the collider, but they are not subject to collider bias. We apply the approach in several simulation scenarios considering different characteristics of the collider variable and strengths of the instrument. We then apply the proposed approach to investigate the causal effect of smoking on bladder cancer in strata of the population defined by bodyweight. The new approach generated unbiased estimates in all the simulation settings. In the applied example, we observed a trend in the stratum-specific MR estimates at different bodyweight levels that suggested stronger effects of smoking on bladder cancer among individuals with lower bodyweight. The proposed approach can be used to perform MR studying heterogeneity among subgroups of the population while avoiding collider bias. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10654-022-00879-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9329404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93294042022-07-29 Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses Coscia, Claudia Gill, Dipender Benítez, Raquel Pérez, Teresa Malats, Núria Burgess, Stephen Eur J Epidemiol Methods Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate the causal effect of a risk factor on an outcome. A collider is a variable influenced by two or more other variables. Naive calculation of MR estimates in strata of the population defined by a collider, such as a variable affected by the risk factor, can result in collider bias. We propose an approach that allows MR estimation in strata of the population while avoiding collider bias. This approach constructs a new variable, the residual collider, as the residual from regression of the collider on the genetic instrument, and then calculates causal estimates in strata defined by quantiles of the residual collider. Estimates stratified on the residual collider will typically have an equivalent interpretation to estimates stratified on the collider, but they are not subject to collider bias. We apply the approach in several simulation scenarios considering different characteristics of the collider variable and strengths of the instrument. We then apply the proposed approach to investigate the causal effect of smoking on bladder cancer in strata of the population defined by bodyweight. The new approach generated unbiased estimates in all the simulation settings. In the applied example, we observed a trend in the stratum-specific MR estimates at different bodyweight levels that suggested stronger effects of smoking on bladder cancer among individuals with lower bodyweight. The proposed approach can be used to perform MR studying heterogeneity among subgroups of the population while avoiding collider bias. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10654-022-00879-0. Springer Netherlands 2022-05-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9329404/ /pubmed/35639294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00879-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Methods
Coscia, Claudia
Gill, Dipender
Benítez, Raquel
Pérez, Teresa
Malats, Núria
Burgess, Stephen
Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses
title Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses
title_full Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses
title_fullStr Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses
title_full_unstemmed Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses
title_short Avoiding collider bias in Mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses
title_sort avoiding collider bias in mendelian randomization when performing stratified analyses
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00879-0
work_keys_str_mv AT cosciaclaudia avoidingcolliderbiasinmendelianrandomizationwhenperformingstratifiedanalyses
AT gilldipender avoidingcolliderbiasinmendelianrandomizationwhenperformingstratifiedanalyses
AT benitezraquel avoidingcolliderbiasinmendelianrandomizationwhenperformingstratifiedanalyses
AT perezteresa avoidingcolliderbiasinmendelianrandomizationwhenperformingstratifiedanalyses
AT malatsnuria avoidingcolliderbiasinmendelianrandomizationwhenperformingstratifiedanalyses
AT burgessstephen avoidingcolliderbiasinmendelianrandomizationwhenperformingstratifiedanalyses