Cargando…
Break-in Period ≤24 Hours as an Option for Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Diabetes
BACKGROUND: The optimal break-in period (BI) of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) initiation for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and diabetes is unclear. We aimed to explore the safety and applicability of a BI ≤24 h in patients with ESRD and diabetes. METHODS: We used a retrospec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.936573 |
_version_ | 1784757939403227136 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Xiaoqing Yang, Liming Sun, Zhanshan Zhang, Xiaoxuan Zhu, Xueyan Zhou, Wenhua Wen, Xi Liu, Shichen Cui, Wenpeng |
author_facet | Hu, Xiaoqing Yang, Liming Sun, Zhanshan Zhang, Xiaoxuan Zhu, Xueyan Zhou, Wenhua Wen, Xi Liu, Shichen Cui, Wenpeng |
author_sort | Hu, Xiaoqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal break-in period (BI) of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) initiation for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and diabetes is unclear. We aimed to explore the safety and applicability of a BI ≤24 h in patients with ESRD and diabetes. METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort design wherein we recruited patients with ESRD and diabetes who underwent USPD at five institutions in China between January 2013 and August 2020. The enrolled patients were grouped according to BI. The primary outcomes were mechanical and infectious complication occurrences, whereas the secondary outcome was technique survival. RESULTS: We enrolled 310 patients with diabetes, of whom 155 and 155 patients were in the BI ≤24 h and BI >24 h groups, respectively. The two groups showed a comparable incidence of infectious and mechanical complications within 6 months after catheter insertion (p>0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a BI ≤24 h was not an independent risk factor for mechanical or infectious complications. Kaplan–Meier estimates showed no statistically significant between-group differences in technique survival rates (p>0.05). Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that a BI ≤24 h was not an independent risk factor for technique failure. CONCLUSION: USPD initiation with a BI ≤24 h may be safe and feasible for patients with ESRD and diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9329536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93295362022-07-29 Break-in Period ≤24 Hours as an Option for Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Diabetes Hu, Xiaoqing Yang, Liming Sun, Zhanshan Zhang, Xiaoxuan Zhu, Xueyan Zhou, Wenhua Wen, Xi Liu, Shichen Cui, Wenpeng Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: The optimal break-in period (BI) of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) initiation for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and diabetes is unclear. We aimed to explore the safety and applicability of a BI ≤24 h in patients with ESRD and diabetes. METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort design wherein we recruited patients with ESRD and diabetes who underwent USPD at five institutions in China between January 2013 and August 2020. The enrolled patients were grouped according to BI. The primary outcomes were mechanical and infectious complication occurrences, whereas the secondary outcome was technique survival. RESULTS: We enrolled 310 patients with diabetes, of whom 155 and 155 patients were in the BI ≤24 h and BI >24 h groups, respectively. The two groups showed a comparable incidence of infectious and mechanical complications within 6 months after catheter insertion (p>0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a BI ≤24 h was not an independent risk factor for mechanical or infectious complications. Kaplan–Meier estimates showed no statistically significant between-group differences in technique survival rates (p>0.05). Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that a BI ≤24 h was not an independent risk factor for technique failure. CONCLUSION: USPD initiation with a BI ≤24 h may be safe and feasible for patients with ESRD and diabetes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9329536/ /pubmed/35909563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.936573 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hu, Yang, Sun, Zhang, Zhu, Zhou, Wen, Liu and Cui https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Hu, Xiaoqing Yang, Liming Sun, Zhanshan Zhang, Xiaoxuan Zhu, Xueyan Zhou, Wenhua Wen, Xi Liu, Shichen Cui, Wenpeng Break-in Period ≤24 Hours as an Option for Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Diabetes |
title | Break-in Period ≤24 Hours as an Option for Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Diabetes |
title_full | Break-in Period ≤24 Hours as an Option for Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Diabetes |
title_fullStr | Break-in Period ≤24 Hours as an Option for Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Break-in Period ≤24 Hours as an Option for Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Diabetes |
title_short | Break-in Period ≤24 Hours as an Option for Urgent-start Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With Diabetes |
title_sort | break-in period ≤24 hours as an option for urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with diabetes |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35909563 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.936573 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huxiaoqing breakinperiod24hoursasanoptionforurgentstartperitonealdialysisinpatientswithdiabetes AT yangliming breakinperiod24hoursasanoptionforurgentstartperitonealdialysisinpatientswithdiabetes AT sunzhanshan breakinperiod24hoursasanoptionforurgentstartperitonealdialysisinpatientswithdiabetes AT zhangxiaoxuan breakinperiod24hoursasanoptionforurgentstartperitonealdialysisinpatientswithdiabetes AT zhuxueyan breakinperiod24hoursasanoptionforurgentstartperitonealdialysisinpatientswithdiabetes AT zhouwenhua breakinperiod24hoursasanoptionforurgentstartperitonealdialysisinpatientswithdiabetes AT wenxi breakinperiod24hoursasanoptionforurgentstartperitonealdialysisinpatientswithdiabetes AT liushichen breakinperiod24hoursasanoptionforurgentstartperitonealdialysisinpatientswithdiabetes AT cuiwenpeng breakinperiod24hoursasanoptionforurgentstartperitonealdialysisinpatientswithdiabetes |