Cargando…

Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?

Recently, research on rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased during the last few decades. Rectal NETs measuring <10 mm without atypical features and confined to the submucosal layer have only 1% risk of metastasis, and the long-term survival probability of patients without metastasis a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Seung Min, Baek, Dong Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811403
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.115
_version_ 1784757963433443328
author Hong, Seung Min
Baek, Dong Hoon
author_facet Hong, Seung Min
Baek, Dong Hoon
author_sort Hong, Seung Min
collection PubMed
description Recently, research on rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased during the last few decades. Rectal NETs measuring <10 mm without atypical features and confined to the submucosal layer have only 1% risk of metastasis, and the long-term survival probability of patients without metastasis at the time of diagnosis is approximately 100%. Therefore, the current guidelines suggest endoscopic resection of rectal NETs of <10 mm is regarded as a safe therapeutic option. However, there are currently no clear recommendations for technique selection for endoscopic resection. The choice of treatment modality for rectal NETs should be based on the lesion size, endoscopic characteristics, grade of differentiation, depth of vertical involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and risk of metastasis. Moreover, the complete resection rate, complications, and experience at the center should be considered. Modified endoscopic mucosal resection is the most suitable resection method for rectal NETs of <10 mm, because it is an effective and safe technique that is relatively simple and less time-consuming compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection should be considered when the tumor size is >10 mm, suctioning is not possible due to fibrosis in the lesion, or when the snaring for modified endoscopic mucosal resection does not work well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9329644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93296442022-08-01 Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better? Hong, Seung Min Baek, Dong Hoon Clin Endosc Review Recently, research on rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased during the last few decades. Rectal NETs measuring <10 mm without atypical features and confined to the submucosal layer have only 1% risk of metastasis, and the long-term survival probability of patients without metastasis at the time of diagnosis is approximately 100%. Therefore, the current guidelines suggest endoscopic resection of rectal NETs of <10 mm is regarded as a safe therapeutic option. However, there are currently no clear recommendations for technique selection for endoscopic resection. The choice of treatment modality for rectal NETs should be based on the lesion size, endoscopic characteristics, grade of differentiation, depth of vertical involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and risk of metastasis. Moreover, the complete resection rate, complications, and experience at the center should be considered. Modified endoscopic mucosal resection is the most suitable resection method for rectal NETs of <10 mm, because it is an effective and safe technique that is relatively simple and less time-consuming compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection should be considered when the tumor size is >10 mm, suctioning is not possible due to fibrosis in the lesion, or when the snaring for modified endoscopic mucosal resection does not work well. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-07 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9329644/ /pubmed/35811403 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.115 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Hong, Seung Min
Baek, Dong Hoon
Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?
title Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?
title_full Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?
title_fullStr Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?
title_short Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?
title_sort endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811403
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.115
work_keys_str_mv AT hongseungmin endoscopictreatmentforrectalneuroendocrinetumorwhichmethodisbetter
AT baekdonghoon endoscopictreatmentforrectalneuroendocrinetumorwhichmethodisbetter