Cargando…
Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?
Recently, research on rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased during the last few decades. Rectal NETs measuring <10 mm without atypical features and confined to the submucosal layer have only 1% risk of metastasis, and the long-term survival probability of patients without metastasis a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811403 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.115 |
_version_ | 1784757963433443328 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Seung Min Baek, Dong Hoon |
author_facet | Hong, Seung Min Baek, Dong Hoon |
author_sort | Hong, Seung Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, research on rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased during the last few decades. Rectal NETs measuring <10 mm without atypical features and confined to the submucosal layer have only 1% risk of metastasis, and the long-term survival probability of patients without metastasis at the time of diagnosis is approximately 100%. Therefore, the current guidelines suggest endoscopic resection of rectal NETs of <10 mm is regarded as a safe therapeutic option. However, there are currently no clear recommendations for technique selection for endoscopic resection. The choice of treatment modality for rectal NETs should be based on the lesion size, endoscopic characteristics, grade of differentiation, depth of vertical involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and risk of metastasis. Moreover, the complete resection rate, complications, and experience at the center should be considered. Modified endoscopic mucosal resection is the most suitable resection method for rectal NETs of <10 mm, because it is an effective and safe technique that is relatively simple and less time-consuming compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection should be considered when the tumor size is >10 mm, suctioning is not possible due to fibrosis in the lesion, or when the snaring for modified endoscopic mucosal resection does not work well. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9329644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93296442022-08-01 Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better? Hong, Seung Min Baek, Dong Hoon Clin Endosc Review Recently, research on rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased during the last few decades. Rectal NETs measuring <10 mm without atypical features and confined to the submucosal layer have only 1% risk of metastasis, and the long-term survival probability of patients without metastasis at the time of diagnosis is approximately 100%. Therefore, the current guidelines suggest endoscopic resection of rectal NETs of <10 mm is regarded as a safe therapeutic option. However, there are currently no clear recommendations for technique selection for endoscopic resection. The choice of treatment modality for rectal NETs should be based on the lesion size, endoscopic characteristics, grade of differentiation, depth of vertical involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and risk of metastasis. Moreover, the complete resection rate, complications, and experience at the center should be considered. Modified endoscopic mucosal resection is the most suitable resection method for rectal NETs of <10 mm, because it is an effective and safe technique that is relatively simple and less time-consuming compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection should be considered when the tumor size is >10 mm, suctioning is not possible due to fibrosis in the lesion, or when the snaring for modified endoscopic mucosal resection does not work well. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-07 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9329644/ /pubmed/35811403 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.115 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Hong, Seung Min Baek, Dong Hoon Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better? |
title | Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better? |
title_full | Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better? |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better? |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better? |
title_short | Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better? |
title_sort | endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811403 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongseungmin endoscopictreatmentforrectalneuroendocrinetumorwhichmethodisbetter AT baekdonghoon endoscopictreatmentforrectalneuroendocrinetumorwhichmethodisbetter |