Cargando…

Consent Builder: an innovative tool for creating research informed consent documents

OBJECTIVE: To describe process innovations related to research informed consent documents, and development and formative evaluation of Consent Builder, a platform for generating consent documents for multicenter studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of Institutional Review Board workflows and doc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sward, Katherine A, Enriquez, Rene, Burr, Jeri, Ozier, Julie, Roebuck, Megan, Elliott, Carrie, Dean, J Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac069
_version_ 1784757966949318656
author Sward, Katherine A
Enriquez, Rene
Burr, Jeri
Ozier, Julie
Roebuck, Megan
Elliott, Carrie
Dean, J Michael
author_facet Sward, Katherine A
Enriquez, Rene
Burr, Jeri
Ozier, Julie
Roebuck, Megan
Elliott, Carrie
Dean, J Michael
author_sort Sward, Katherine A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe process innovations related to research informed consent documents, and development and formative evaluation of Consent Builder, a platform for generating consent documents for multicenter studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of Institutional Review Board workflows and documents, followed by process redesign, document redesign, and software development. Locally developed software leverages REDCap and LaTeX. A small-scale usability study was conducted. RESULTS: Process innovations were combining document types, and conceptualizing 2-part informed consent documents: part 1 standardizing the study description and part 2 with local site verbiage. Consent Builder was implemented in the Trial Innovation Network. User survey scores were acceptable; but areas for improvement were noted. LaTeX coding was the biggest challenge for users. DISCUSSION: The process changes were generally well accepted. The software implementation uncovered un-accounted for assumptions, and variability in IRB review workflow across centers. Technical modifications may be needed before widespread implementation. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated proof-of-concept of an approach to generate research consent documents that are consistent across sites in study description, but which allow for customization of local site verbiage. The Consent Builder tool is an example of an operational innovation, helping meet a need that arose in part due to regulations around use of Single IRB for multicenter trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9329658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93296582022-07-29 Consent Builder: an innovative tool for creating research informed consent documents Sward, Katherine A Enriquez, Rene Burr, Jeri Ozier, Julie Roebuck, Megan Elliott, Carrie Dean, J Michael JAMIA Open Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: To describe process innovations related to research informed consent documents, and development and formative evaluation of Consent Builder, a platform for generating consent documents for multicenter studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of Institutional Review Board workflows and documents, followed by process redesign, document redesign, and software development. Locally developed software leverages REDCap and LaTeX. A small-scale usability study was conducted. RESULTS: Process innovations were combining document types, and conceptualizing 2-part informed consent documents: part 1 standardizing the study description and part 2 with local site verbiage. Consent Builder was implemented in the Trial Innovation Network. User survey scores were acceptable; but areas for improvement were noted. LaTeX coding was the biggest challenge for users. DISCUSSION: The process changes were generally well accepted. The software implementation uncovered un-accounted for assumptions, and variability in IRB review workflow across centers. Technical modifications may be needed before widespread implementation. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated proof-of-concept of an approach to generate research consent documents that are consistent across sites in study description, but which allow for customization of local site verbiage. The Consent Builder tool is an example of an operational innovation, helping meet a need that arose in part due to regulations around use of Single IRB for multicenter trials. Oxford University Press 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9329658/ /pubmed/35911667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac069 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research and Applications
Sward, Katherine A
Enriquez, Rene
Burr, Jeri
Ozier, Julie
Roebuck, Megan
Elliott, Carrie
Dean, J Michael
Consent Builder: an innovative tool for creating research informed consent documents
title Consent Builder: an innovative tool for creating research informed consent documents
title_full Consent Builder: an innovative tool for creating research informed consent documents
title_fullStr Consent Builder: an innovative tool for creating research informed consent documents
title_full_unstemmed Consent Builder: an innovative tool for creating research informed consent documents
title_short Consent Builder: an innovative tool for creating research informed consent documents
title_sort consent builder: an innovative tool for creating research informed consent documents
topic Research and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac069
work_keys_str_mv AT swardkatherinea consentbuilderaninnovativetoolforcreatingresearchinformedconsentdocuments
AT enriquezrene consentbuilderaninnovativetoolforcreatingresearchinformedconsentdocuments
AT burrjeri consentbuilderaninnovativetoolforcreatingresearchinformedconsentdocuments
AT ozierjulie consentbuilderaninnovativetoolforcreatingresearchinformedconsentdocuments
AT roebuckmegan consentbuilderaninnovativetoolforcreatingresearchinformedconsentdocuments
AT elliottcarrie consentbuilderaninnovativetoolforcreatingresearchinformedconsentdocuments
AT deanjmichael consentbuilderaninnovativetoolforcreatingresearchinformedconsentdocuments