Cargando…

Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center

Background: Organs at risk (OARs) delineation is a crucial step of radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning workflow. Time-consuming and inter-observer variability are main issues in manual OAR delineation, mainly in the head and neck (H & N) district. Deep-learning based auto-segmentation is a prom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Aviero, Andrea, Re, Alessia, Catucci, Francesco, Piccari, Danila, Votta, Claudio, Piro, Domenico, Piras, Antonio, Di Dio, Carmela, Iezzi, Martina, Preziosi, Francesco, Menna, Sebastiano, Quaranta, Flaviovincenzo, Boschetti, Althea, Marras, Marco, Miccichè, Francesco, Gallus, Roberto, Indovina, Luca, Bussu, Francesco, Valentini, Vincenzo, Cusumano, Davide, Mattiucci, Gian Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159057
_version_ 1784757986529378304
author D’Aviero, Andrea
Re, Alessia
Catucci, Francesco
Piccari, Danila
Votta, Claudio
Piro, Domenico
Piras, Antonio
Di Dio, Carmela
Iezzi, Martina
Preziosi, Francesco
Menna, Sebastiano
Quaranta, Flaviovincenzo
Boschetti, Althea
Marras, Marco
Miccichè, Francesco
Gallus, Roberto
Indovina, Luca
Bussu, Francesco
Valentini, Vincenzo
Cusumano, Davide
Mattiucci, Gian Carlo
author_facet D’Aviero, Andrea
Re, Alessia
Catucci, Francesco
Piccari, Danila
Votta, Claudio
Piro, Domenico
Piras, Antonio
Di Dio, Carmela
Iezzi, Martina
Preziosi, Francesco
Menna, Sebastiano
Quaranta, Flaviovincenzo
Boschetti, Althea
Marras, Marco
Miccichè, Francesco
Gallus, Roberto
Indovina, Luca
Bussu, Francesco
Valentini, Vincenzo
Cusumano, Davide
Mattiucci, Gian Carlo
author_sort D’Aviero, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Background: Organs at risk (OARs) delineation is a crucial step of radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning workflow. Time-consuming and inter-observer variability are main issues in manual OAR delineation, mainly in the head and neck (H & N) district. Deep-learning based auto-segmentation is a promising strategy to improve OARs contouring in radiotherapy departments. A comparison of deep-learning-generated auto-contours (AC) with manual contours (MC) was performed by three expert radiation oncologists from a single center. Methods: Planning computed tomography (CT) scans of patients undergoing RT treatments for H&N cancers were considered. CT scans were processed by Limbus Contour auto-segmentation software, a commercial deep-learning auto-segmentation based software to generate AC. H&N protocol was used to perform AC, with the structure set consisting of bilateral brachial plexus, brain, brainstem, bilateral cochlea, pharyngeal constrictors, eye globes, bilateral lens, mandible, optic chiasm, bilateral optic nerves, oral cavity, bilateral parotids, spinal cord, bilateral submandibular glands, lips and thyroid. Manual revision of OARs was performed according to international consensus guidelines. The AC and MC were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance transform (DT). Results: A total of 274 contours obtained by processing CT scans were included in the analysis. The highest values of DSC were obtained for the brain (DSC 1.00), left and right eye globes and the mandible (DSC 0.98). The structures with greater MC editing were optic chiasm, optic nerves and cochleae. Conclusions: In this preliminary analysis, deep-learning auto-segmentation seems to provide acceptable H&N OAR delineations. For less accurate organs, AC could be considered a starting point for review and manual adjustment. Our results suggest that AC could become a useful time-saving tool to optimize workload and resources in RT departments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9329735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93297352022-07-29 Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center D’Aviero, Andrea Re, Alessia Catucci, Francesco Piccari, Danila Votta, Claudio Piro, Domenico Piras, Antonio Di Dio, Carmela Iezzi, Martina Preziosi, Francesco Menna, Sebastiano Quaranta, Flaviovincenzo Boschetti, Althea Marras, Marco Miccichè, Francesco Gallus, Roberto Indovina, Luca Bussu, Francesco Valentini, Vincenzo Cusumano, Davide Mattiucci, Gian Carlo Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Organs at risk (OARs) delineation is a crucial step of radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning workflow. Time-consuming and inter-observer variability are main issues in manual OAR delineation, mainly in the head and neck (H & N) district. Deep-learning based auto-segmentation is a promising strategy to improve OARs contouring in radiotherapy departments. A comparison of deep-learning-generated auto-contours (AC) with manual contours (MC) was performed by three expert radiation oncologists from a single center. Methods: Planning computed tomography (CT) scans of patients undergoing RT treatments for H&N cancers were considered. CT scans were processed by Limbus Contour auto-segmentation software, a commercial deep-learning auto-segmentation based software to generate AC. H&N protocol was used to perform AC, with the structure set consisting of bilateral brachial plexus, brain, brainstem, bilateral cochlea, pharyngeal constrictors, eye globes, bilateral lens, mandible, optic chiasm, bilateral optic nerves, oral cavity, bilateral parotids, spinal cord, bilateral submandibular glands, lips and thyroid. Manual revision of OARs was performed according to international consensus guidelines. The AC and MC were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance transform (DT). Results: A total of 274 contours obtained by processing CT scans were included in the analysis. The highest values of DSC were obtained for the brain (DSC 1.00), left and right eye globes and the mandible (DSC 0.98). The structures with greater MC editing were optic chiasm, optic nerves and cochleae. Conclusions: In this preliminary analysis, deep-learning auto-segmentation seems to provide acceptable H&N OAR delineations. For less accurate organs, AC could be considered a starting point for review and manual adjustment. Our results suggest that AC could become a useful time-saving tool to optimize workload and resources in RT departments. MDPI 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9329735/ /pubmed/35897425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159057 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
D’Aviero, Andrea
Re, Alessia
Catucci, Francesco
Piccari, Danila
Votta, Claudio
Piro, Domenico
Piras, Antonio
Di Dio, Carmela
Iezzi, Martina
Preziosi, Francesco
Menna, Sebastiano
Quaranta, Flaviovincenzo
Boschetti, Althea
Marras, Marco
Miccichè, Francesco
Gallus, Roberto
Indovina, Luca
Bussu, Francesco
Valentini, Vincenzo
Cusumano, Davide
Mattiucci, Gian Carlo
Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center
title Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center
title_full Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center
title_fullStr Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center
title_short Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center
title_sort clinical validation of a deep-learning segmentation software in head and neck: an early analysis in a developing radiation oncology center
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9329735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159057
work_keys_str_mv AT davieroandrea clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT realessia clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT catuccifrancesco clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT piccaridanila clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT vottaclaudio clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT pirodomenico clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT pirasantonio clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT didiocarmela clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT iezzimartina clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT preziosifrancesco clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT mennasebastiano clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT quarantaflaviovincenzo clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT boschettialthea clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT marrasmarco clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT miccichefrancesco clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT gallusroberto clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT indovinaluca clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT bussufrancesco clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT valentinivincenzo clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT cusumanodavide clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter
AT mattiuccigiancarlo clinicalvalidationofadeeplearningsegmentationsoftwareinheadandneckanearlyanalysisinadevelopingradiationoncologycenter