Cargando…

Visual Perception in Expert Athletes: The Case of Rock Climbers

The purpose of the present study was to examine the visual perception system in expert climbers through a psychophysical optical test in a cross-sectional study. Twenty-seven male participants with an International Rock Climbing Research Association (IRCRA) best on-sight lead skill level ranging bet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcen-Cinca, Noel, Sanchez, Xavier, Otin, Sofia, Cimarras-Otal, Cristina, Bataller-Cervero, Ana Vanessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911052
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903518
_version_ 1784758082238152704
author Marcen-Cinca, Noel
Sanchez, Xavier
Otin, Sofia
Cimarras-Otal, Cristina
Bataller-Cervero, Ana Vanessa
author_facet Marcen-Cinca, Noel
Sanchez, Xavier
Otin, Sofia
Cimarras-Otal, Cristina
Bataller-Cervero, Ana Vanessa
author_sort Marcen-Cinca, Noel
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the present study was to examine the visual perception system in expert climbers through a psychophysical optical test in a cross-sectional study. Twenty-seven male participants with an International Rock Climbing Research Association (IRCRA) best on-sight lead skill level ranging between 18 and 27 and a best red-point level ranging between 18 and 29 completed a series of psychophysical optic tests assessing their visual field, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. Climbers were divided by their best red-pointed lead level, and, following IRCRA recommendations, two groups were created: an advanced group (IRCRA redpoint level between 18 and 23), and an elite-high elite group (IRCRA redpoint level between 24 and 29). The elite group presented more training days per week (5.25 ± 1.28), best on-sighted lead level (24.63 ± 1.92 IRCRA), and best red-pointed lead level (26.63 ± 2.56 IRCRA) than the advanced group (3.67 ± 0.91 training days per week, 19.50 ± 1.04 IRCRA on-sighted level and 20.67 ± 1.57 IRCRA red-pointed level). Better visual perception outputs were produced by the group of elite climbers in visual field tests; no differences were observed between the two groups for visual acuity and contrast sensitivity tests. Overall, findings indicate that best climbers performed better at the visual perception tasks that tested their visual field. Such better perception from best climbers is discussed given (1) the greater time they spend coercing the visual system during practicing climbing and (2) the specific complexity of the stimuli as they are confronted to harder routes where holds are less perceptible and the time to find best hold sequences is constrained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9330107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93301072022-07-29 Visual Perception in Expert Athletes: The Case of Rock Climbers Marcen-Cinca, Noel Sanchez, Xavier Otin, Sofia Cimarras-Otal, Cristina Bataller-Cervero, Ana Vanessa Front Psychol Psychology The purpose of the present study was to examine the visual perception system in expert climbers through a psychophysical optical test in a cross-sectional study. Twenty-seven male participants with an International Rock Climbing Research Association (IRCRA) best on-sight lead skill level ranging between 18 and 27 and a best red-point level ranging between 18 and 29 completed a series of psychophysical optic tests assessing their visual field, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. Climbers were divided by their best red-pointed lead level, and, following IRCRA recommendations, two groups were created: an advanced group (IRCRA redpoint level between 18 and 23), and an elite-high elite group (IRCRA redpoint level between 24 and 29). The elite group presented more training days per week (5.25 ± 1.28), best on-sighted lead level (24.63 ± 1.92 IRCRA), and best red-pointed lead level (26.63 ± 2.56 IRCRA) than the advanced group (3.67 ± 0.91 training days per week, 19.50 ± 1.04 IRCRA on-sighted level and 20.67 ± 1.57 IRCRA red-pointed level). Better visual perception outputs were produced by the group of elite climbers in visual field tests; no differences were observed between the two groups for visual acuity and contrast sensitivity tests. Overall, findings indicate that best climbers performed better at the visual perception tasks that tested their visual field. Such better perception from best climbers is discussed given (1) the greater time they spend coercing the visual system during practicing climbing and (2) the specific complexity of the stimuli as they are confronted to harder routes where holds are less perceptible and the time to find best hold sequences is constrained. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9330107/ /pubmed/35911052 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903518 Text en Copyright © 2022 Marcen-Cinca, Sanchez, Otin, Cimarras-Otal and Bataller-Cervero. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Marcen-Cinca, Noel
Sanchez, Xavier
Otin, Sofia
Cimarras-Otal, Cristina
Bataller-Cervero, Ana Vanessa
Visual Perception in Expert Athletes: The Case of Rock Climbers
title Visual Perception in Expert Athletes: The Case of Rock Climbers
title_full Visual Perception in Expert Athletes: The Case of Rock Climbers
title_fullStr Visual Perception in Expert Athletes: The Case of Rock Climbers
title_full_unstemmed Visual Perception in Expert Athletes: The Case of Rock Climbers
title_short Visual Perception in Expert Athletes: The Case of Rock Climbers
title_sort visual perception in expert athletes: the case of rock climbers
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35911052
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903518
work_keys_str_mv AT marcencincanoel visualperceptioninexpertathletesthecaseofrockclimbers
AT sanchezxavier visualperceptioninexpertathletesthecaseofrockclimbers
AT otinsofia visualperceptioninexpertathletesthecaseofrockclimbers
AT cimarrasotalcristina visualperceptioninexpertathletesthecaseofrockclimbers
AT batallercerveroanavanessa visualperceptioninexpertathletesthecaseofrockclimbers