Cargando…
The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach
In this paper, we propose to account for the blame addressed to vaccine skeptics and “anti-vax” (VS and AV) by considering their attitude as the result of the psychological mechanism of denial, understood in a psychodynamic manner. To that effect, we draw on a secondary account of our clinical exper...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35910972 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886368 |
_version_ | 1784758095363178496 |
---|---|
author | Putois, Olivier Helms, Julie |
author_facet | Putois, Olivier Helms, Julie |
author_sort | Putois, Olivier |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper, we propose to account for the blame addressed to vaccine skeptics and “anti-vax” (VS and AV) by considering their attitude as the result of the psychological mechanism of denial, understood in a psychodynamic manner. To that effect, we draw on a secondary account of our clinical experience in two hospital units (psychiatry and intensive care unit), and on openly available media material. First, we lay out how VS and AV can be understood as the result from fetishist risk denial, a specific psychological transaction with an object by which VS and AV people feel intimately protected; this object is viewed as so powerful that its protection makes the vaccine appear irrelevant. Second, we show how this mechanism can explain the specific content of the blame frequently addressed to VS and AV, who are reproached with being selfish by vaccinated people and caregivers. We contend that, contrary to common belief, they are thus blamed because they force others (and especially caregivers) to compensate their lack of self-protection and preservation, which derives from their exclusive relation to an almighty object. While such a relation accounts for the unwillingness to consider vaccination, it also explains the harshness of the blame voiced by caregivers, who feel helpless in most situations as they cannot effectively force VS and AV to take care of themselves and others. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9330159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93301592022-07-29 The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach Putois, Olivier Helms, Julie Front Psychol Psychology In this paper, we propose to account for the blame addressed to vaccine skeptics and “anti-vax” (VS and AV) by considering their attitude as the result of the psychological mechanism of denial, understood in a psychodynamic manner. To that effect, we draw on a secondary account of our clinical experience in two hospital units (psychiatry and intensive care unit), and on openly available media material. First, we lay out how VS and AV can be understood as the result from fetishist risk denial, a specific psychological transaction with an object by which VS and AV people feel intimately protected; this object is viewed as so powerful that its protection makes the vaccine appear irrelevant. Second, we show how this mechanism can explain the specific content of the blame frequently addressed to VS and AV, who are reproached with being selfish by vaccinated people and caregivers. We contend that, contrary to common belief, they are thus blamed because they force others (and especially caregivers) to compensate their lack of self-protection and preservation, which derives from their exclusive relation to an almighty object. While such a relation accounts for the unwillingness to consider vaccination, it also explains the harshness of the blame voiced by caregivers, who feel helpless in most situations as they cannot effectively force VS and AV to take care of themselves and others. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9330159/ /pubmed/35910972 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886368 Text en Copyright © 2022 Putois and Helms. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Putois, Olivier Helms, Julie The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach |
title | The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach |
title_full | The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach |
title_fullStr | The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach |
title_short | The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach |
title_sort | role of denial in vaccine skeptics and “anti-vax” blame: a psychodynamic approach |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35910972 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886368 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT putoisolivier theroleofdenialinvaccineskepticsandantivaxblameapsychodynamicapproach AT helmsjulie theroleofdenialinvaccineskepticsandantivaxblameapsychodynamicapproach AT putoisolivier roleofdenialinvaccineskepticsandantivaxblameapsychodynamicapproach AT helmsjulie roleofdenialinvaccineskepticsandantivaxblameapsychodynamicapproach |