Cargando…

The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach

In this paper, we propose to account for the blame addressed to vaccine skeptics and “anti-vax” (VS and AV) by considering their attitude as the result of the psychological mechanism of denial, understood in a psychodynamic manner. To that effect, we draw on a secondary account of our clinical exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putois, Olivier, Helms, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35910972
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886368
_version_ 1784758095363178496
author Putois, Olivier
Helms, Julie
author_facet Putois, Olivier
Helms, Julie
author_sort Putois, Olivier
collection PubMed
description In this paper, we propose to account for the blame addressed to vaccine skeptics and “anti-vax” (VS and AV) by considering their attitude as the result of the psychological mechanism of denial, understood in a psychodynamic manner. To that effect, we draw on a secondary account of our clinical experience in two hospital units (psychiatry and intensive care unit), and on openly available media material. First, we lay out how VS and AV can be understood as the result from fetishist risk denial, a specific psychological transaction with an object by which VS and AV people feel intimately protected; this object is viewed as so powerful that its protection makes the vaccine appear irrelevant. Second, we show how this mechanism can explain the specific content of the blame frequently addressed to VS and AV, who are reproached with being selfish by vaccinated people and caregivers. We contend that, contrary to common belief, they are thus blamed because they force others (and especially caregivers) to compensate their lack of self-protection and preservation, which derives from their exclusive relation to an almighty object. While such a relation accounts for the unwillingness to consider vaccination, it also explains the harshness of the blame voiced by caregivers, who feel helpless in most situations as they cannot effectively force VS and AV to take care of themselves and others.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9330159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93301592022-07-29 The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach Putois, Olivier Helms, Julie Front Psychol Psychology In this paper, we propose to account for the blame addressed to vaccine skeptics and “anti-vax” (VS and AV) by considering their attitude as the result of the psychological mechanism of denial, understood in a psychodynamic manner. To that effect, we draw on a secondary account of our clinical experience in two hospital units (psychiatry and intensive care unit), and on openly available media material. First, we lay out how VS and AV can be understood as the result from fetishist risk denial, a specific psychological transaction with an object by which VS and AV people feel intimately protected; this object is viewed as so powerful that its protection makes the vaccine appear irrelevant. Second, we show how this mechanism can explain the specific content of the blame frequently addressed to VS and AV, who are reproached with being selfish by vaccinated people and caregivers. We contend that, contrary to common belief, they are thus blamed because they force others (and especially caregivers) to compensate their lack of self-protection and preservation, which derives from their exclusive relation to an almighty object. While such a relation accounts for the unwillingness to consider vaccination, it also explains the harshness of the blame voiced by caregivers, who feel helpless in most situations as they cannot effectively force VS and AV to take care of themselves and others. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9330159/ /pubmed/35910972 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886368 Text en Copyright © 2022 Putois and Helms. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Putois, Olivier
Helms, Julie
The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach
title The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach
title_full The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach
title_fullStr The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach
title_short The Role of Denial in Vaccine Skeptics and “Anti-vax” Blame: A Psychodynamic Approach
title_sort role of denial in vaccine skeptics and “anti-vax” blame: a psychodynamic approach
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35910972
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886368
work_keys_str_mv AT putoisolivier theroleofdenialinvaccineskepticsandantivaxblameapsychodynamicapproach
AT helmsjulie theroleofdenialinvaccineskepticsandantivaxblameapsychodynamicapproach
AT putoisolivier roleofdenialinvaccineskepticsandantivaxblameapsychodynamicapproach
AT helmsjulie roleofdenialinvaccineskepticsandantivaxblameapsychodynamicapproach