Cargando…
Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The association between gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is well known. Previous randomized controlled studies demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) effectively treat cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). However, some DOACs a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7 |
_version_ | 1784758220562104320 |
---|---|
author | Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee Owattanapanich, Weerapat Chinthammitr, Yingyong Ruchutrakool, Theera Suwanawiboon, Bundarika |
author_facet | Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee Owattanapanich, Weerapat Chinthammitr, Yingyong Ruchutrakool, Theera Suwanawiboon, Bundarika |
author_sort | Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The association between gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is well known. Previous randomized controlled studies demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) effectively treat cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). However, some DOACs appeared to increase the risk of bleeding, particularly in patients with GI malignancies. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs in GI cancer-associated thrombosis. METHODS: Two investigators individually reviewed all studies that compared DOACs and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in GI cancer-associated thrombosis and were published in MEDLINE and EMBASE before February 2022. The effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each eligible study were combined using the Mantel–Haenszel method. RESULTS: A total of 2226 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rates of major bleeding in the DOAC and LMWH groups were not significantly different (relative risk [RR]: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.84–2.04; P = 0.23; I(2) = 41%). However, the rate of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) was significantly higher in the DOAC group (RR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.24–2.52; P = 0.002; I(2) = 8%). The risks of recurrent VTE in the groups did not significantly differ (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.49–1.04; P = 0.08; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggest that treatment of GI cancer-associated thrombosis with DOACs significantly increases the risk of CRNMB. However, the risk of major bleeding was not significantly different. The efficacy of DOACs for preventing recurrent VTE in GI cancer was comparable to that of LMWHs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: INPLASY202180113. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9330678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93306782022-07-29 Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee Owattanapanich, Weerapat Chinthammitr, Yingyong Ruchutrakool, Theera Suwanawiboon, Bundarika Thromb J Research BACKGROUND: The association between gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is well known. Previous randomized controlled studies demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) effectively treat cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). However, some DOACs appeared to increase the risk of bleeding, particularly in patients with GI malignancies. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs in GI cancer-associated thrombosis. METHODS: Two investigators individually reviewed all studies that compared DOACs and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in GI cancer-associated thrombosis and were published in MEDLINE and EMBASE before February 2022. The effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each eligible study were combined using the Mantel–Haenszel method. RESULTS: A total of 2226 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rates of major bleeding in the DOAC and LMWH groups were not significantly different (relative risk [RR]: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.84–2.04; P = 0.23; I(2) = 41%). However, the rate of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) was significantly higher in the DOAC group (RR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.24–2.52; P = 0.002; I(2) = 8%). The risks of recurrent VTE in the groups did not significantly differ (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.49–1.04; P = 0.08; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggest that treatment of GI cancer-associated thrombosis with DOACs significantly increases the risk of CRNMB. However, the risk of major bleeding was not significantly different. The efficacy of DOACs for preventing recurrent VTE in GI cancer was comparable to that of LMWHs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: INPLASY202180113. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7. BioMed Central 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9330678/ /pubmed/35902879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee Owattanapanich, Weerapat Chinthammitr, Yingyong Ruchutrakool, Theera Suwanawiboon, Bundarika Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rungjirajittranontarinee directoralanticoagulantsversuslowmolecularweightheparinsforthetreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolisminpatientswithgastrointestinalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT owattanapanichweerapat directoralanticoagulantsversuslowmolecularweightheparinsforthetreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolisminpatientswithgastrointestinalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chinthammitryingyong directoralanticoagulantsversuslowmolecularweightheparinsforthetreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolisminpatientswithgastrointestinalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ruchutrakooltheera directoralanticoagulantsversuslowmolecularweightheparinsforthetreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolisminpatientswithgastrointestinalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT suwanawiboonbundarika directoralanticoagulantsversuslowmolecularweightheparinsforthetreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolisminpatientswithgastrointestinalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |