Cargando…

Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The association between gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is well known. Previous randomized controlled studies demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) effectively treat cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). However, some DOACs a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee, Owattanapanich, Weerapat, Chinthammitr, Yingyong, Ruchutrakool, Theera, Suwanawiboon, Bundarika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7
_version_ 1784758220562104320
author Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee
Owattanapanich, Weerapat
Chinthammitr, Yingyong
Ruchutrakool, Theera
Suwanawiboon, Bundarika
author_facet Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee
Owattanapanich, Weerapat
Chinthammitr, Yingyong
Ruchutrakool, Theera
Suwanawiboon, Bundarika
author_sort Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The association between gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is well known. Previous randomized controlled studies demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) effectively treat cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). However, some DOACs appeared to increase the risk of bleeding, particularly in patients with GI malignancies. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs in GI cancer-associated thrombosis. METHODS: Two investigators individually reviewed all studies that compared DOACs and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in GI cancer-associated thrombosis and were published in MEDLINE and EMBASE before February 2022. The effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each eligible study were combined using the Mantel–Haenszel method. RESULTS: A total of 2226 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rates of major bleeding in the DOAC and LMWH groups were not significantly different (relative risk [RR]: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.84–2.04; P = 0.23; I(2) = 41%). However, the rate of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) was significantly higher in the DOAC group (RR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.24–2.52; P = 0.002; I(2) = 8%). The risks of recurrent VTE in the groups did not significantly differ (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.49–1.04; P = 0.08; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggest that treatment of GI cancer-associated thrombosis with DOACs significantly increases the risk of CRNMB. However, the risk of major bleeding was not significantly different. The efficacy of DOACs for preventing recurrent VTE in GI cancer was comparable to that of LMWHs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: INPLASY202180113. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9330678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93306782022-07-29 Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee Owattanapanich, Weerapat Chinthammitr, Yingyong Ruchutrakool, Theera Suwanawiboon, Bundarika Thromb J Research BACKGROUND: The association between gastrointestinal (GI) cancer and a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is well known. Previous randomized controlled studies demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) effectively treat cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). However, some DOACs appeared to increase the risk of bleeding, particularly in patients with GI malignancies. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs in GI cancer-associated thrombosis. METHODS: Two investigators individually reviewed all studies that compared DOACs and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in GI cancer-associated thrombosis and were published in MEDLINE and EMBASE before February 2022. The effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each eligible study were combined using the Mantel–Haenszel method. RESULTS: A total of 2226 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rates of major bleeding in the DOAC and LMWH groups were not significantly different (relative risk [RR]: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.84–2.04; P = 0.23; I(2) = 41%). However, the rate of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) was significantly higher in the DOAC group (RR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.24–2.52; P = 0.002; I(2) = 8%). The risks of recurrent VTE in the groups did not significantly differ (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.49–1.04; P = 0.08; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggest that treatment of GI cancer-associated thrombosis with DOACs significantly increases the risk of CRNMB. However, the risk of major bleeding was not significantly different. The efficacy of DOACs for preventing recurrent VTE in GI cancer was comparable to that of LMWHs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: INPLASY202180113. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7. BioMed Central 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9330678/ /pubmed/35902879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rungjirajittranon, Tarinee
Owattanapanich, Weerapat
Chinthammitr, Yingyong
Ruchutrakool, Theera
Suwanawiboon, Bundarika
Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35902879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rungjirajittranontarinee directoralanticoagulantsversuslowmolecularweightheparinsforthetreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolisminpatientswithgastrointestinalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT owattanapanichweerapat directoralanticoagulantsversuslowmolecularweightheparinsforthetreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolisminpatientswithgastrointestinalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chinthammitryingyong directoralanticoagulantsversuslowmolecularweightheparinsforthetreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolisminpatientswithgastrointestinalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ruchutrakooltheera directoralanticoagulantsversuslowmolecularweightheparinsforthetreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolisminpatientswithgastrointestinalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suwanawiboonbundarika directoralanticoagulantsversuslowmolecularweightheparinsforthetreatmentofacutevenousthromboembolisminpatientswithgastrointestinalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis