Cargando…

Management of pharyngeal collapse in patients affected by moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

OBJECTIVE: This study reports our experience in a selected cohort of patients affected by mild-moderate OSAS, without tonsillar obstruction, and treated with pharyngoplasty. METHODS: In a case-control retrospective study, we compared modified expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (MESP) to modified bar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorusso, Francesco, Dispenza, Francesco, Sireci, Federico, Immordino, Angelo, Immordino, Palmira, Gallina, Salvatore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore Srl 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35880367
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1871
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study reports our experience in a selected cohort of patients affected by mild-moderate OSAS, without tonsillar obstruction, and treated with pharyngoplasty. METHODS: In a case-control retrospective study, we compared modified expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (MESP) to modified barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (MBRP) in adult patients with oropharyngeal transversal collapse with a BMI ≤ 30 kg/m(2), and mild-moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). A clinical evaluation, including collection of anthropometric data and sleep endoscopy, was performed. Six months after surgery, symptoms recording, clinical evaluation and polysomnography (PSG) were repeated. RESULTS: We enrolled 20 patients: 10 treated with MESP and 10 treated with MBRP. Mean apnoea-hypoapnoea index (AHI) was 22.8 (± 5.63). We observed in both groups a significant reduction of AHI and oropharyngeal obstruction (p = 0.01), with a success rate, according with Sher’s criteria, of 90% for MESP and 80% for MBRP, respectively. Post-surgical pain and snoring reduction were significantly lower with MBRP. CONCLUSIONS: We recorded similar success rates for both techniques. MBRP may be considered better than MESP due to less surgical time, no potential mucosal damage, absence of knots, and faster recovery with less pain.