Cargando…

PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study

Background: Opportunistic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening may reduce prostate cancer mortality risk but is associated with false positive results, biopsy complications and overdiagnosis. Although different organisations have emphasised the importance of shared decision making (SDM) to assi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lumbreras, Blanca, Parker, Lucy Anne, Alonso-Coello, Pablo, Mira-Bernabeu, Javier, Gómez-Pérez, Luis, Caballero-Romeu, Juan Pablo, Pertusa-Martínez, Salvador, Cebrián-Cuenca, Ana, Moral-Peláez, Irene, López-Garrigós, Maite, Canelo-Aybar, Carlos, Ronda, Elena, Guilabert, Mercedes, Prieto-González, Antonio, Hernández-Aguado, Ildefonso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19158904
_version_ 1784758274280652800
author Lumbreras, Blanca
Parker, Lucy Anne
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Mira-Bernabeu, Javier
Gómez-Pérez, Luis
Caballero-Romeu, Juan Pablo
Pertusa-Martínez, Salvador
Cebrián-Cuenca, Ana
Moral-Peláez, Irene
López-Garrigós, Maite
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
Ronda, Elena
Guilabert, Mercedes
Prieto-González, Antonio
Hernández-Aguado, Ildefonso
author_facet Lumbreras, Blanca
Parker, Lucy Anne
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Mira-Bernabeu, Javier
Gómez-Pérez, Luis
Caballero-Romeu, Juan Pablo
Pertusa-Martínez, Salvador
Cebrián-Cuenca, Ana
Moral-Peláez, Irene
López-Garrigós, Maite
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
Ronda, Elena
Guilabert, Mercedes
Prieto-González, Antonio
Hernández-Aguado, Ildefonso
author_sort Lumbreras, Blanca
collection PubMed
description Background: Opportunistic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening may reduce prostate cancer mortality risk but is associated with false positive results, biopsy complications and overdiagnosis. Although different organisations have emphasised the importance of shared decision making (SDM) to assist men in deciding whether to undergo prostate cancer screening, recent evaluations show that the available decision aids fail to facilitate SDM, mainly because they do not consider the patients’ perspective in their design. We aim to systematically develop and test a patient decision aid to promote SDM in prostate cancer screening, following the Knowledge to Action framework. Methods: (1) Feasibility study: a quantitative survey evaluating the population and clinician (urologists and general practitioners) knowledge of the benefits and risks derived from PSA determination and the awareness of the available recommendations. Focus groups to explore the challenges patients and clinicians face when discussing prostate cancer screening, the relevance of a decision aid and how best to integrate it into practice. (2) Patient decision aid development: Based on this data, an evidence-based multicomponent SDM patient decision aid will be developed. (3) User-testing: an assessment of the prototype of the initial patient decision aid through a user-testing design based on mix-methods (questionnaire and semi-structured review). The decision aid will be refined through several iterative cycles of feedback and redesign. (4) Validation: an evaluation of the patient decision aid through a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Discussion: The designed patient decision aid will provide balanced information on screening benefits and risks and should help patients to consider their personal preferences and to take a more active role in decision making. Conclusions: The well-designed patient decision aid (PDA) will provide balanced information on screening benefits and risks and help patients consider their personal preferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9330901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93309012022-07-29 PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study Lumbreras, Blanca Parker, Lucy Anne Alonso-Coello, Pablo Mira-Bernabeu, Javier Gómez-Pérez, Luis Caballero-Romeu, Juan Pablo Pertusa-Martínez, Salvador Cebrián-Cuenca, Ana Moral-Peláez, Irene López-Garrigós, Maite Canelo-Aybar, Carlos Ronda, Elena Guilabert, Mercedes Prieto-González, Antonio Hernández-Aguado, Ildefonso Int J Environ Res Public Health Study Protocol Background: Opportunistic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening may reduce prostate cancer mortality risk but is associated with false positive results, biopsy complications and overdiagnosis. Although different organisations have emphasised the importance of shared decision making (SDM) to assist men in deciding whether to undergo prostate cancer screening, recent evaluations show that the available decision aids fail to facilitate SDM, mainly because they do not consider the patients’ perspective in their design. We aim to systematically develop and test a patient decision aid to promote SDM in prostate cancer screening, following the Knowledge to Action framework. Methods: (1) Feasibility study: a quantitative survey evaluating the population and clinician (urologists and general practitioners) knowledge of the benefits and risks derived from PSA determination and the awareness of the available recommendations. Focus groups to explore the challenges patients and clinicians face when discussing prostate cancer screening, the relevance of a decision aid and how best to integrate it into practice. (2) Patient decision aid development: Based on this data, an evidence-based multicomponent SDM patient decision aid will be developed. (3) User-testing: an assessment of the prototype of the initial patient decision aid through a user-testing design based on mix-methods (questionnaire and semi-structured review). The decision aid will be refined through several iterative cycles of feedback and redesign. (4) Validation: an evaluation of the patient decision aid through a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Discussion: The designed patient decision aid will provide balanced information on screening benefits and risks and should help patients to consider their personal preferences and to take a more active role in decision making. Conclusions: The well-designed patient decision aid (PDA) will provide balanced information on screening benefits and risks and help patients consider their personal preferences. MDPI 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9330901/ /pubmed/35897274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19158904 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lumbreras, Blanca
Parker, Lucy Anne
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Mira-Bernabeu, Javier
Gómez-Pérez, Luis
Caballero-Romeu, Juan Pablo
Pertusa-Martínez, Salvador
Cebrián-Cuenca, Ana
Moral-Peláez, Irene
López-Garrigós, Maite
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
Ronda, Elena
Guilabert, Mercedes
Prieto-González, Antonio
Hernández-Aguado, Ildefonso
PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study
title PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study
title_full PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study
title_fullStr PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study
title_full_unstemmed PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study
title_short PROSHADE Protocol: Designing and Evaluating a Decision Aid for Promoting Shared Decision Making in Opportunistic Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Mix-Method Study
title_sort proshade protocol: designing and evaluating a decision aid for promoting shared decision making in opportunistic screening for prostate cancer: a mix-method study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9330901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19158904
work_keys_str_mv AT lumbrerasblanca proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT parkerlucyanne proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT alonsocoellopablo proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT mirabernabeujavier proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT gomezperezluis proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT caballeroromeujuanpablo proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT pertusamartinezsalvador proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT cebriancuencaana proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT moralpelaezirene proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT lopezgarrigosmaite proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT caneloaybarcarlos proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT rondaelena proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT guilabertmercedes proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT prietogonzalezantonio proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy
AT hernandezaguadoildefonso proshadeprotocoldesigningandevaluatingadecisionaidforpromotingshareddecisionmakinginopportunisticscreeningforprostatecanceramixmethodstudy