Cargando…
Systematic Review of COVID-19-Related Physical Activity-Based Rehabilitations: Benefits to Be Confirmed by More Robust Methodological Approaches
The first emergency was to receive and treat COVID-19 patients in their acute phase; today, there is a clear need to propose appropriate post-acute rehabilitation programs. The aim of this research was to systematically review the effects of physical activity programs in the recovery of post-COVID-1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159025 |
_version_ | 1784758304526827520 |
---|---|
author | Bailly, Mélina Pélissier, Léna Coudeyre, Emmanuel Evrard, Bertrand Bingula, Rea Rochette, Corinne Mériade, Laurent Blavignac, Christelle Fournier, Anne-Cécile Bignon, Yves-Jean Rannou, Fabrice Dutheil, Frédéric Thivel, David Duclos, Martine |
author_facet | Bailly, Mélina Pélissier, Léna Coudeyre, Emmanuel Evrard, Bertrand Bingula, Rea Rochette, Corinne Mériade, Laurent Blavignac, Christelle Fournier, Anne-Cécile Bignon, Yves-Jean Rannou, Fabrice Dutheil, Frédéric Thivel, David Duclos, Martine |
author_sort | Bailly, Mélina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The first emergency was to receive and treat COVID-19 patients in their acute phase; today, there is a clear need to propose appropriate post-acute rehabilitation programs. The aim of this research was to systematically review the effects of physical activity programs in the recovery of post-COVID-19 patients. The literature search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022289219), and was conducted between August and December 2021. A total of 35 studies out of the 1528 initially identified were finally included in the analysis. The systematic review clearly showed the health benefits of rehabilitation including physical activity in post-COVID-19 recovery, regardless of exercise modalities. These positive results were even observed using minor muscle re-mobilization for severe cases (i.e., postural changes, few steps—2 times/day) or using low volumes of exercise for mild-to-moderate cases (i.e., 120 min/week). A total of 97% of the 29 studies that performed statistical analyses demonstrated a significant increase in at least one parameter of functional capacity, and 96% of the 26 studies that statistically investigated the effects on the quality of life, mental health, and general state reported improvements. Yet, most of the studies were retrospective, uncontrolled, and enrolled aged people with comorbidities presented in severe forms of COVID-19. Physical activity programs, in addition to their high heterogeneity, remained poorly described in 83% of the studies and were part of a multidisciplinary program for 89% of the studies. Despite promising results, there is today a real need for prospective well-designed studies specifically assessing the effects of physical activity. In addition, it might appear relevant to propose standardized programs further considering the main characteristics of patients such as age, comorbidities, or the severity of COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9331032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93310322022-07-29 Systematic Review of COVID-19-Related Physical Activity-Based Rehabilitations: Benefits to Be Confirmed by More Robust Methodological Approaches Bailly, Mélina Pélissier, Léna Coudeyre, Emmanuel Evrard, Bertrand Bingula, Rea Rochette, Corinne Mériade, Laurent Blavignac, Christelle Fournier, Anne-Cécile Bignon, Yves-Jean Rannou, Fabrice Dutheil, Frédéric Thivel, David Duclos, Martine Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The first emergency was to receive and treat COVID-19 patients in their acute phase; today, there is a clear need to propose appropriate post-acute rehabilitation programs. The aim of this research was to systematically review the effects of physical activity programs in the recovery of post-COVID-19 patients. The literature search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022289219), and was conducted between August and December 2021. A total of 35 studies out of the 1528 initially identified were finally included in the analysis. The systematic review clearly showed the health benefits of rehabilitation including physical activity in post-COVID-19 recovery, regardless of exercise modalities. These positive results were even observed using minor muscle re-mobilization for severe cases (i.e., postural changes, few steps—2 times/day) or using low volumes of exercise for mild-to-moderate cases (i.e., 120 min/week). A total of 97% of the 29 studies that performed statistical analyses demonstrated a significant increase in at least one parameter of functional capacity, and 96% of the 26 studies that statistically investigated the effects on the quality of life, mental health, and general state reported improvements. Yet, most of the studies were retrospective, uncontrolled, and enrolled aged people with comorbidities presented in severe forms of COVID-19. Physical activity programs, in addition to their high heterogeneity, remained poorly described in 83% of the studies and were part of a multidisciplinary program for 89% of the studies. Despite promising results, there is today a real need for prospective well-designed studies specifically assessing the effects of physical activity. In addition, it might appear relevant to propose standardized programs further considering the main characteristics of patients such as age, comorbidities, or the severity of COVID-19. MDPI 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9331032/ /pubmed/35897400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159025 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Bailly, Mélina Pélissier, Léna Coudeyre, Emmanuel Evrard, Bertrand Bingula, Rea Rochette, Corinne Mériade, Laurent Blavignac, Christelle Fournier, Anne-Cécile Bignon, Yves-Jean Rannou, Fabrice Dutheil, Frédéric Thivel, David Duclos, Martine Systematic Review of COVID-19-Related Physical Activity-Based Rehabilitations: Benefits to Be Confirmed by More Robust Methodological Approaches |
title | Systematic Review of COVID-19-Related Physical Activity-Based Rehabilitations: Benefits to Be Confirmed by More Robust Methodological Approaches |
title_full | Systematic Review of COVID-19-Related Physical Activity-Based Rehabilitations: Benefits to Be Confirmed by More Robust Methodological Approaches |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review of COVID-19-Related Physical Activity-Based Rehabilitations: Benefits to Be Confirmed by More Robust Methodological Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review of COVID-19-Related Physical Activity-Based Rehabilitations: Benefits to Be Confirmed by More Robust Methodological Approaches |
title_short | Systematic Review of COVID-19-Related Physical Activity-Based Rehabilitations: Benefits to Be Confirmed by More Robust Methodological Approaches |
title_sort | systematic review of covid-19-related physical activity-based rehabilitations: benefits to be confirmed by more robust methodological approaches |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35897400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baillymelina systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT pelissierlena systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT coudeyreemmanuel systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT evrardbertrand systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT bingularea systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT rochettecorinne systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT meriadelaurent systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT blavignacchristelle systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT fournierannececile systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT bignonyvesjean systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT rannoufabrice systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT dutheilfrederic systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT thiveldavid systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches AT duclosmartine systematicreviewofcovid19relatedphysicalactivitybasedrehabilitationsbenefitstobeconfirmedbymorerobustmethodologicalapproaches |