Cargando…

Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Minimally invasive surgery can be used for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients with ovarian cancer initial disease unresectable by laparotomy without compromising survival. The main benefit of minimally invasive surgery for primary and interval debu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Augusto, Magrina, Javier F., Magtibay, Paul M., Neto, Joao Siufi, Siufi, Daniela F. S., Chang, Yu-Hui H., Perez-Medina, Tirso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892837
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153579
_version_ 1784758371781443584
author Pereira, Augusto
Magrina, Javier F.
Magtibay, Paul M.
Neto, Joao Siufi
Siufi, Daniela F. S.
Chang, Yu-Hui H.
Perez-Medina, Tirso
author_facet Pereira, Augusto
Magrina, Javier F.
Magtibay, Paul M.
Neto, Joao Siufi
Siufi, Daniela F. S.
Chang, Yu-Hui H.
Perez-Medina, Tirso
author_sort Pereira, Augusto
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Minimally invasive surgery can be used for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients with ovarian cancer initial disease unresectable by laparotomy without compromising survival. The main benefit of minimally invasive surgery for primary and interval debulking is a shorter hospital stay. There are fewer intestinal resections at interval debulking compared with primary debulking. ABSTRACT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy allows a minimally invasive approach for interval debulking in patients with ovarian cancer considered unresectable to no residual disease by laparotomy at diagnosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the type of surgical approach at interval debulking (ID) after three courses of carboplatin and taxol in patients with unresectable ovarian cancer at diagnosis compared with the type of surgical approach at primary debulking (PD). A secondary objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes of MIS vs. laparotomy at ID. A retrospective review of the type of surgical approach at ID following three courses of carboplatin and taxol was compared with the surgical approach at PD, and a review of the perioperative outcomes of MIS vs. open at ID was performed during the period from 21 January 2012, through 21 February 2013, for stage IIIC > 2 cm or IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) unresectable at diagnosis and the surgical approach at PD. During the study period, 127 patients with stage IIIC or IV EOC met the inclusion criteria. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), laparoscopic or robotic, was used in 21.6% of patients at ID and in 23.3% of patients at PD. At ID, MIS patients had a shorter hospital stay as compared to laparotomy (2 vs. 8 days; p < 0.001). At 5 year follow-up, 31.5% of EOC patients were alive (ID MIS: 47.5% vs. ID open: 30%; PD MIS: 41% vs. PD open: 28%), while 24.4% had no evidence of disease (ID MIS: 39% vs. ID open: 19.5%; PD MIS: 32% vs. PD open: 22%). Among living patients, 22% had evidence of disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a form of chemo-debulking and allows a minimally invasive approach at interval debulking in about one-fifth of the patients, with initial disease deemed unresectable to no residual tumor at initial diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9331315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93313152022-07-29 Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer? Pereira, Augusto Magrina, Javier F. Magtibay, Paul M. Neto, Joao Siufi Siufi, Daniela F. S. Chang, Yu-Hui H. Perez-Medina, Tirso Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Minimally invasive surgery can be used for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients with ovarian cancer initial disease unresectable by laparotomy without compromising survival. The main benefit of minimally invasive surgery for primary and interval debulking is a shorter hospital stay. There are fewer intestinal resections at interval debulking compared with primary debulking. ABSTRACT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy allows a minimally invasive approach for interval debulking in patients with ovarian cancer considered unresectable to no residual disease by laparotomy at diagnosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the type of surgical approach at interval debulking (ID) after three courses of carboplatin and taxol in patients with unresectable ovarian cancer at diagnosis compared with the type of surgical approach at primary debulking (PD). A secondary objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes of MIS vs. laparotomy at ID. A retrospective review of the type of surgical approach at ID following three courses of carboplatin and taxol was compared with the surgical approach at PD, and a review of the perioperative outcomes of MIS vs. open at ID was performed during the period from 21 January 2012, through 21 February 2013, for stage IIIC > 2 cm or IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) unresectable at diagnosis and the surgical approach at PD. During the study period, 127 patients with stage IIIC or IV EOC met the inclusion criteria. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), laparoscopic or robotic, was used in 21.6% of patients at ID and in 23.3% of patients at PD. At ID, MIS patients had a shorter hospital stay as compared to laparotomy (2 vs. 8 days; p < 0.001). At 5 year follow-up, 31.5% of EOC patients were alive (ID MIS: 47.5% vs. ID open: 30%; PD MIS: 41% vs. PD open: 28%), while 24.4% had no evidence of disease (ID MIS: 39% vs. ID open: 19.5%; PD MIS: 32% vs. PD open: 22%). Among living patients, 22% had evidence of disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a form of chemo-debulking and allows a minimally invasive approach at interval debulking in about one-fifth of the patients, with initial disease deemed unresectable to no residual tumor at initial diagnosis. MDPI 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9331315/ /pubmed/35892837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153579 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pereira, Augusto
Magrina, Javier F.
Magtibay, Paul M.
Neto, Joao Siufi
Siufi, Daniela F. S.
Chang, Yu-Hui H.
Perez-Medina, Tirso
Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?
title Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?
title_full Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?
title_fullStr Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?
title_short Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?
title_sort does mis play a role in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892837
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153579
work_keys_str_mv AT pereiraaugusto doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer
AT magrinajavierf doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer
AT magtibaypaulm doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer
AT netojoaosiufi doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer
AT siufidanielafs doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer
AT changyuhuih doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer
AT perezmedinatirso doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer