Cargando…
Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer?
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Minimally invasive surgery can be used for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients with ovarian cancer initial disease unresectable by laparotomy without compromising survival. The main benefit of minimally invasive surgery for primary and interval debu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153579 |
_version_ | 1784758371781443584 |
---|---|
author | Pereira, Augusto Magrina, Javier F. Magtibay, Paul M. Neto, Joao Siufi Siufi, Daniela F. S. Chang, Yu-Hui H. Perez-Medina, Tirso |
author_facet | Pereira, Augusto Magrina, Javier F. Magtibay, Paul M. Neto, Joao Siufi Siufi, Daniela F. S. Chang, Yu-Hui H. Perez-Medina, Tirso |
author_sort | Pereira, Augusto |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Minimally invasive surgery can be used for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients with ovarian cancer initial disease unresectable by laparotomy without compromising survival. The main benefit of minimally invasive surgery for primary and interval debulking is a shorter hospital stay. There are fewer intestinal resections at interval debulking compared with primary debulking. ABSTRACT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy allows a minimally invasive approach for interval debulking in patients with ovarian cancer considered unresectable to no residual disease by laparotomy at diagnosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the type of surgical approach at interval debulking (ID) after three courses of carboplatin and taxol in patients with unresectable ovarian cancer at diagnosis compared with the type of surgical approach at primary debulking (PD). A secondary objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes of MIS vs. laparotomy at ID. A retrospective review of the type of surgical approach at ID following three courses of carboplatin and taxol was compared with the surgical approach at PD, and a review of the perioperative outcomes of MIS vs. open at ID was performed during the period from 21 January 2012, through 21 February 2013, for stage IIIC > 2 cm or IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) unresectable at diagnosis and the surgical approach at PD. During the study period, 127 patients with stage IIIC or IV EOC met the inclusion criteria. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), laparoscopic or robotic, was used in 21.6% of patients at ID and in 23.3% of patients at PD. At ID, MIS patients had a shorter hospital stay as compared to laparotomy (2 vs. 8 days; p < 0.001). At 5 year follow-up, 31.5% of EOC patients were alive (ID MIS: 47.5% vs. ID open: 30%; PD MIS: 41% vs. PD open: 28%), while 24.4% had no evidence of disease (ID MIS: 39% vs. ID open: 19.5%; PD MIS: 32% vs. PD open: 22%). Among living patients, 22% had evidence of disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a form of chemo-debulking and allows a minimally invasive approach at interval debulking in about one-fifth of the patients, with initial disease deemed unresectable to no residual tumor at initial diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9331315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93313152022-07-29 Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer? Pereira, Augusto Magrina, Javier F. Magtibay, Paul M. Neto, Joao Siufi Siufi, Daniela F. S. Chang, Yu-Hui H. Perez-Medina, Tirso Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Minimally invasive surgery can be used for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients with ovarian cancer initial disease unresectable by laparotomy without compromising survival. The main benefit of minimally invasive surgery for primary and interval debulking is a shorter hospital stay. There are fewer intestinal resections at interval debulking compared with primary debulking. ABSTRACT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy allows a minimally invasive approach for interval debulking in patients with ovarian cancer considered unresectable to no residual disease by laparotomy at diagnosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the type of surgical approach at interval debulking (ID) after three courses of carboplatin and taxol in patients with unresectable ovarian cancer at diagnosis compared with the type of surgical approach at primary debulking (PD). A secondary objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes of MIS vs. laparotomy at ID. A retrospective review of the type of surgical approach at ID following three courses of carboplatin and taxol was compared with the surgical approach at PD, and a review of the perioperative outcomes of MIS vs. open at ID was performed during the period from 21 January 2012, through 21 February 2013, for stage IIIC > 2 cm or IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) unresectable at diagnosis and the surgical approach at PD. During the study period, 127 patients with stage IIIC or IV EOC met the inclusion criteria. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), laparoscopic or robotic, was used in 21.6% of patients at ID and in 23.3% of patients at PD. At ID, MIS patients had a shorter hospital stay as compared to laparotomy (2 vs. 8 days; p < 0.001). At 5 year follow-up, 31.5% of EOC patients were alive (ID MIS: 47.5% vs. ID open: 30%; PD MIS: 41% vs. PD open: 28%), while 24.4% had no evidence of disease (ID MIS: 39% vs. ID open: 19.5%; PD MIS: 32% vs. PD open: 22%). Among living patients, 22% had evidence of disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a form of chemo-debulking and allows a minimally invasive approach at interval debulking in about one-fifth of the patients, with initial disease deemed unresectable to no residual tumor at initial diagnosis. MDPI 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9331315/ /pubmed/35892837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153579 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pereira, Augusto Magrina, Javier F. Magtibay, Paul M. Neto, Joao Siufi Siufi, Daniela F. S. Chang, Yu-Hui H. Perez-Medina, Tirso Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer? |
title | Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer? |
title_full | Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer? |
title_fullStr | Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer? |
title_short | Does MIS Play a Role in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer? |
title_sort | does mis play a role in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35892837 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereiraaugusto doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer AT magrinajavierf doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer AT magtibaypaulm doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer AT netojoaosiufi doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer AT siufidanielafs doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer AT changyuhuih doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer AT perezmedinatirso doesmisplayaroleinthetreatmentofadvancedovariancancer |