Cargando…
Creatine and creatinine quantification in olympic athletes: dried blood spot analysis pilot study
Capillary dried blood spot (DBS) samples facilitate field-based collection without venipuncture. This pilot study aims to evaluate the viability of creatine (Cr) and creatinine (Crt) quantification using fresh capillary serum (Cr(S)/Crt(S)) and DBS samples (Cr(DBS)/Crt(DBS)), using Flow Injection An...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Institute of Sport in Warsaw
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959322 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.108701 |
Sumario: | Capillary dried blood spot (DBS) samples facilitate field-based collection without venipuncture. This pilot study aims to evaluate the viability of creatine (Cr) and creatinine (Crt) quantification using fresh capillary serum (Cr(S)/Crt(S)) and DBS samples (Cr(DBS)/Crt(DBS)), using Flow Injection Analysis Mass Spectrometry (FIA – MS). Nine Olympic Athletes provided a capillary blood sample to assess Cr(S)/Crt(S) and Cr(DBS)/Crt(DBS) quantified by FIA – MS. No difference between Crt(S) (mean ± SD: 813.6 ± 102.4 μmol/L) and Crt(DBS) (812.4 ± 108.1 μmol/L) was observed with acceptable variance [SEM 88.7; CV 10.7%; ICC 0.57 (CI 95% 0.06 – 0.84)] and agreement [very strong (Spearman: r = 0.77; p < 0.01) or strong (Pearson: r = 0.56; p = 0.04); Bland Altman: lower (-193) and upper (+196) limits of agreement]. Cr(S) (mean ± SD: 691.8 ± 165.2 μmol/L) was significantly different to Cr(DBS) (2911 ± 571.4 μmol/L) with unacceptable variance [SEM 171.6; CV 27%; ICC 0.002 (CI 95% -0.02 – 0.07)] and ‘weak’ agreement [Spearman: r = 0.21, p = 0.47 and Pearson: r = 0.06, p = 0.84; Bland Altman lower (-3367) and upper (-1072) limits of agreement]. Crt quantification is viable using both Crt(S) and Crt(DBS) (but not for Cr and Cr(S)/Cr(DBS)), with the DBS tissue handling technique offering several methodological and practice facing advantages. Future work should expand upon the sample size, explore sport/discipline relevant analytes across a full competitive season, including key training, recovery and performance blocks of their periodized performance plan. |
---|