Cargando…

Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements

To investigate the ability of the OMNI-RES (0–10) scale to estimate velocity and loading changes during sets to failure in the hang power clean (HPC) exercise. Eleven recreationally resistance-trained males (28.5 ± 3.5 years) with an average one-repetition maximum (1RM) value of 1.1 ± 0.07 kg body m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, Mark, Tomkins, Sam Damian, Triplett, Travis N, Larumbe-Zabala, Eneko, Naclerio, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959325
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.106156
_version_ 1784758378148397056
author Chapman, Mark
Tomkins, Sam Damian
Triplett, Travis N
Larumbe-Zabala, Eneko
Naclerio, Fernando
author_facet Chapman, Mark
Tomkins, Sam Damian
Triplett, Travis N
Larumbe-Zabala, Eneko
Naclerio, Fernando
author_sort Chapman, Mark
collection PubMed
description To investigate the ability of the OMNI-RES (0–10) scale to estimate velocity and loading changes during sets to failure in the hang power clean (HPC) exercise. Eleven recreationally resistance-trained males (28.5 ± 3.5 years) with an average one-repetition maximum (1RM) value of 1.1 ± 0.07 kg body mass(-1) in HPC, were assessed on five separate days with 48 hours of rest between sessions. After determining the 1RM value, participants performed four sets to self-determined failure with the following relative loading ranges: 60% < 70%, 70 < 80%, 80 < 90% and > 90%. The peak vertical velocity (PVV), and Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) were measured for every repetition of each set. The RPE expressed after the first repetition (RPE-1) and when the highest value of PVV was achieved during the set (RPE-max) were similar and significantly lower than the RPE associated with a 5% (RPE-5%) and 10% (RPE-10%) drop in PVV. In addition, the RPE produced at failure was similar to RPE-5% only for the heaviest range (≥ 90%). Furthermore, RPE-1 was useful to distinguish loading zones between the four assessed ranges (60 < 70%, vs. 70 < 80%, vs. 80 < 90%, vs. ≥ 90%). The RPE seems to be useful to identify PVV changes (maximal, 5% and 10% drop) during continuous sets to self-determined failure and to distinguish 10% loading zone increments, from 60 to 100% of 1RM in the HPC exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9331341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93313412022-09-01 Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements Chapman, Mark Tomkins, Sam Damian Triplett, Travis N Larumbe-Zabala, Eneko Naclerio, Fernando Biol Sport Original Paper To investigate the ability of the OMNI-RES (0–10) scale to estimate velocity and loading changes during sets to failure in the hang power clean (HPC) exercise. Eleven recreationally resistance-trained males (28.5 ± 3.5 years) with an average one-repetition maximum (1RM) value of 1.1 ± 0.07 kg body mass(-1) in HPC, were assessed on five separate days with 48 hours of rest between sessions. After determining the 1RM value, participants performed four sets to self-determined failure with the following relative loading ranges: 60% < 70%, 70 < 80%, 80 < 90% and > 90%. The peak vertical velocity (PVV), and Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) were measured for every repetition of each set. The RPE expressed after the first repetition (RPE-1) and when the highest value of PVV was achieved during the set (RPE-max) were similar and significantly lower than the RPE associated with a 5% (RPE-5%) and 10% (RPE-10%) drop in PVV. In addition, the RPE produced at failure was similar to RPE-5% only for the heaviest range (≥ 90%). Furthermore, RPE-1 was useful to distinguish loading zones between the four assessed ranges (60 < 70%, vs. 70 < 80%, vs. 80 < 90%, vs. ≥ 90%). The RPE seems to be useful to identify PVV changes (maximal, 5% and 10% drop) during continuous sets to self-determined failure and to distinguish 10% loading zone increments, from 60 to 100% of 1RM in the HPC exercise. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2021-08-27 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9331341/ /pubmed/35959325 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.106156 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Chapman, Mark
Tomkins, Sam Damian
Triplett, Travis N
Larumbe-Zabala, Eneko
Naclerio, Fernando
Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements
title Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements
title_full Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements
title_fullStr Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements
title_short Estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements
title_sort estimation of peak vertical velocity and relative load changes by subjective measures in weightlifting movements
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959325
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.106156
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmanmark estimationofpeakverticalvelocityandrelativeloadchangesbysubjectivemeasuresinweightliftingmovements
AT tomkinssamdamian estimationofpeakverticalvelocityandrelativeloadchangesbysubjectivemeasuresinweightliftingmovements
AT tripletttravisn estimationofpeakverticalvelocityandrelativeloadchangesbysubjectivemeasuresinweightliftingmovements
AT larumbezabalaeneko estimationofpeakverticalvelocityandrelativeloadchangesbysubjectivemeasuresinweightliftingmovements
AT nacleriofernando estimationofpeakverticalvelocityandrelativeloadchangesbysubjectivemeasuresinweightliftingmovements