Cargando…

Combined training is not superior to strength and aerobic training to mitigate cardiovascular risk in adult healthy men

Although the beneficial effects of aerobic training on cardiovascular risk factors are evident, the potential beneficial effect of strength and combined training on these risk factors is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of aerobic and strength training programmes, performed alo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonçalves, Reginaldo, Motta-Santos, Daisy, Szmuchrowski, Leszek, Couto, Bruno, Soares, Ytalo M., Damasceno, Vinícius de O., Pedrosa, Gustavo F., Drummond, Marcos D. M., Lima, Fernando V., Silva, Alexandre S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959329
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.107483
_version_ 1784758380651347968
author Gonçalves, Reginaldo
Motta-Santos, Daisy
Szmuchrowski, Leszek
Couto, Bruno
Soares, Ytalo M.
Damasceno, Vinícius de O.
Pedrosa, Gustavo F.
Drummond, Marcos D. M.
Lima, Fernando V.
Silva, Alexandre S.
author_facet Gonçalves, Reginaldo
Motta-Santos, Daisy
Szmuchrowski, Leszek
Couto, Bruno
Soares, Ytalo M.
Damasceno, Vinícius de O.
Pedrosa, Gustavo F.
Drummond, Marcos D. M.
Lima, Fernando V.
Silva, Alexandre S.
author_sort Gonçalves, Reginaldo
collection PubMed
description Although the beneficial effects of aerobic training on cardiovascular risk factors are evident, the potential beneficial effect of strength and combined training on these risk factors is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of aerobic and strength training programmes, performed alone or in combination, on cardiovascular risk factors in sedentary, apparently healthy and non-obese adult men. The study was conducted with 37 subjects who were randomly divided into the following groups: aerobic (AG), combined (ASG), strength (SG) and control (CG). The exercise programmes were performed three times a week and lasted approximately 50 minutes. Dietary intake, anthropometry, blood pressure, muscular strength, aerobic capacity, lipid profile and glycaemic control were assessed before and after 12 weeks of the intervention. One-way analysis of variation (ANOVA) for baseline, and ANOVA for repeated measures were used to assess differences between the initial and final time points of the four groups. Changes in blood pressure and glycaemic control were not significant in any of the groups. No differences were observed in LDL-C between training groups. HDL-C increased significantly only in the AG. In conclusion, if minimal changes in the lipid profile are needed, an aerobic training programme can provide possible benefits for HDL-C in apparently healthy and non-obese adult men.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9331351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93313512022-09-01 Combined training is not superior to strength and aerobic training to mitigate cardiovascular risk in adult healthy men Gonçalves, Reginaldo Motta-Santos, Daisy Szmuchrowski, Leszek Couto, Bruno Soares, Ytalo M. Damasceno, Vinícius de O. Pedrosa, Gustavo F. Drummond, Marcos D. M. Lima, Fernando V. Silva, Alexandre S. Biol Sport Original Paper Although the beneficial effects of aerobic training on cardiovascular risk factors are evident, the potential beneficial effect of strength and combined training on these risk factors is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of aerobic and strength training programmes, performed alone or in combination, on cardiovascular risk factors in sedentary, apparently healthy and non-obese adult men. The study was conducted with 37 subjects who were randomly divided into the following groups: aerobic (AG), combined (ASG), strength (SG) and control (CG). The exercise programmes were performed three times a week and lasted approximately 50 minutes. Dietary intake, anthropometry, blood pressure, muscular strength, aerobic capacity, lipid profile and glycaemic control were assessed before and after 12 weeks of the intervention. One-way analysis of variation (ANOVA) for baseline, and ANOVA for repeated measures were used to assess differences between the initial and final time points of the four groups. Changes in blood pressure and glycaemic control were not significant in any of the groups. No differences were observed in LDL-C between training groups. HDL-C increased significantly only in the AG. In conclusion, if minimal changes in the lipid profile are needed, an aerobic training programme can provide possible benefits for HDL-C in apparently healthy and non-obese adult men. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2021-08-30 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9331351/ /pubmed/35959329 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.107483 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gonçalves, Reginaldo
Motta-Santos, Daisy
Szmuchrowski, Leszek
Couto, Bruno
Soares, Ytalo M.
Damasceno, Vinícius de O.
Pedrosa, Gustavo F.
Drummond, Marcos D. M.
Lima, Fernando V.
Silva, Alexandre S.
Combined training is not superior to strength and aerobic training to mitigate cardiovascular risk in adult healthy men
title Combined training is not superior to strength and aerobic training to mitigate cardiovascular risk in adult healthy men
title_full Combined training is not superior to strength and aerobic training to mitigate cardiovascular risk in adult healthy men
title_fullStr Combined training is not superior to strength and aerobic training to mitigate cardiovascular risk in adult healthy men
title_full_unstemmed Combined training is not superior to strength and aerobic training to mitigate cardiovascular risk in adult healthy men
title_short Combined training is not superior to strength and aerobic training to mitigate cardiovascular risk in adult healthy men
title_sort combined training is not superior to strength and aerobic training to mitigate cardiovascular risk in adult healthy men
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959329
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.107483
work_keys_str_mv AT goncalvesreginaldo combinedtrainingisnotsuperiortostrengthandaerobictrainingtomitigatecardiovascularriskinadulthealthymen
AT mottasantosdaisy combinedtrainingisnotsuperiortostrengthandaerobictrainingtomitigatecardiovascularriskinadulthealthymen
AT szmuchrowskileszek combinedtrainingisnotsuperiortostrengthandaerobictrainingtomitigatecardiovascularriskinadulthealthymen
AT coutobruno combinedtrainingisnotsuperiortostrengthandaerobictrainingtomitigatecardiovascularriskinadulthealthymen
AT soaresytalom combinedtrainingisnotsuperiortostrengthandaerobictrainingtomitigatecardiovascularriskinadulthealthymen
AT damascenoviniciusdeo combinedtrainingisnotsuperiortostrengthandaerobictrainingtomitigatecardiovascularriskinadulthealthymen
AT pedrosagustavof combinedtrainingisnotsuperiortostrengthandaerobictrainingtomitigatecardiovascularriskinadulthealthymen
AT drummondmarcosdm combinedtrainingisnotsuperiortostrengthandaerobictrainingtomitigatecardiovascularriskinadulthealthymen
AT limafernandov combinedtrainingisnotsuperiortostrengthandaerobictrainingtomitigatecardiovascularriskinadulthealthymen
AT silvaalexandres combinedtrainingisnotsuperiortostrengthandaerobictrainingtomitigatecardiovascularriskinadulthealthymen