Cargando…
A Personal Prospective on Testosterone Therapy in Women—What We Know in 2022
Hormone replacement therapy continues to be a controversial topic in medicine, with certain narratives regarding safety concerns that are not scientifically established in peer-reviewed literature. These negative narratives, specifically undermining the use of testosterone in women, have caused wome...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35893288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081194 |
_version_ | 1784758501364465664 |
---|---|
author | Donovitz, Gary S. |
author_facet | Donovitz, Gary S. |
author_sort | Donovitz, Gary S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hormone replacement therapy continues to be a controversial topic in medicine, with certain narratives regarding safety concerns that are not scientifically established in peer-reviewed literature. These negative narratives, specifically undermining the use of testosterone in women, have caused women to remain without any Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved testosterone therapies, while more than 30 FDA-approved testosterone therapies are available for men in the United States. This has resulted in millions of women suffering in silence with very common symptoms of perimenopause and menopause that could easily be addressed with the use of testosterone. There is growing evidence to support the use of physiologic doses of testosterone for sexual function, osteoporosis prevention, brain protection, and breast protection. The safety of testosterone use in women has been evaluated for the past 80 years. A recent publication on the complications of subcutaneous hormone-pellet therapy, looking at a large cohort of patients over 7 years, demonstrated long-term safety. In addition, there have been two large long-term peer-reviewed studies showing a significant reduction in the incidence of invasive breast cancer in women on testosterone therapy. Perhaps it is time for the FDA to consider approving products that would benefit testosterone-deficient women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9331845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93318452022-07-29 A Personal Prospective on Testosterone Therapy in Women—What We Know in 2022 Donovitz, Gary S. J Pers Med Commentary Hormone replacement therapy continues to be a controversial topic in medicine, with certain narratives regarding safety concerns that are not scientifically established in peer-reviewed literature. These negative narratives, specifically undermining the use of testosterone in women, have caused women to remain without any Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved testosterone therapies, while more than 30 FDA-approved testosterone therapies are available for men in the United States. This has resulted in millions of women suffering in silence with very common symptoms of perimenopause and menopause that could easily be addressed with the use of testosterone. There is growing evidence to support the use of physiologic doses of testosterone for sexual function, osteoporosis prevention, brain protection, and breast protection. The safety of testosterone use in women has been evaluated for the past 80 years. A recent publication on the complications of subcutaneous hormone-pellet therapy, looking at a large cohort of patients over 7 years, demonstrated long-term safety. In addition, there have been two large long-term peer-reviewed studies showing a significant reduction in the incidence of invasive breast cancer in women on testosterone therapy. Perhaps it is time for the FDA to consider approving products that would benefit testosterone-deficient women. MDPI 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9331845/ /pubmed/35893288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081194 Text en © 2022 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Commentary Donovitz, Gary S. A Personal Prospective on Testosterone Therapy in Women—What We Know in 2022 |
title | A Personal Prospective on Testosterone Therapy in Women—What We Know in 2022 |
title_full | A Personal Prospective on Testosterone Therapy in Women—What We Know in 2022 |
title_fullStr | A Personal Prospective on Testosterone Therapy in Women—What We Know in 2022 |
title_full_unstemmed | A Personal Prospective on Testosterone Therapy in Women—What We Know in 2022 |
title_short | A Personal Prospective on Testosterone Therapy in Women—What We Know in 2022 |
title_sort | personal prospective on testosterone therapy in women—what we know in 2022 |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35893288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donovitzgarys apersonalprospectiveontestosteronetherapyinwomenwhatweknowin2022 AT donovitzgarys personalprospectiveontestosteronetherapyinwomenwhatweknowin2022 |